Article

2024-11-11 Home Front: Politix

CNN pundit floats Harris as possible replacement for SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2024-11-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11149 views ] Top

#1 Sotomayor can at least speak in semi-coherent sentences.

Posted by Mullah Richard 2024-11-11 06:46|| 2024-11-11 06:46|| Front Page Top

I have a better idea.

Posted by Besoeker 2024-11-11 07:18|| 2024-11-11 07:18|| Front Page Top

#3 When Joe Rogan can outdraw CNN, they'd best get back to paying attention to their survival.

Posted by Procopius2k 2024-11-11 07:28|| 2024-11-11 07:28|| Front Page Top

#4
CNN Reporter Applies For Babylon Bee Position.

Posted by NN2N1 2024-11-11 08:19|| 2024-11-11 08:19|| Front Page Top

#5 SoTD^^^

Posted by Mercutio 2024-11-11 09:03|| 2024-11-11 09:03|| Front Page Top

#6 First, she has to resign, which she said she would not. Second, Harris would have to pass the Senate testimony, which would be public, brutal, and an embarrassment to the Dems. Even the dumbest Dem in office would not consider this level of stupidity.

Posted by 49 Pan 2024-11-11 10:39|| 2024-11-11 10:39|| Front Page Top

#7 Even the dumbest Dem in office would not consider this level of stupidity.

Did you speak to the squad?

Posted by Grom the Reflective 2024-11-11 10:54|| 2024-11-11 10:54|| Front Page Top

#8 #6 Even the dumbest Dem in office would not consider this level of stupidity.

Justice Ketanji 'what is a women' Jackson. I rest my case.

Posted by Procopius2k 2024-11-11 11:00|| 2024-11-11 11:00|| Front Page Top

#9 A pretty low bar: Maxine Waters, Hank, Swallwell, AOC,...

Posted by Frank G 2024-11-11 11:03|| 2024-11-11 11:03|| Front Page Top

#10 Dems would have to blow up the filibuster to get her in. That would be the most moronically timed political stupidity of all time.

Posted by Super Hose 2024-11-11 12:30|| 2024-11-11 12:30|| Front Page Top

#11 #8. That was/is a national tragedy. I hope some day history doesn't just gloss over that and instead has the courage to tell the truth about that episode ("the powers that be gave up on any illusion that they were striving for excellence and instead were all about rubbing the peoples' noses in right-think").

Posted by Crusader 2024-11-11 13:09|| 2024-11-11 13:09|| Front Page Top

#12 And just when you think you already had trouble understanding SCOTUS decisions, here's a chance to turn them into pure gibberish.

Posted by ed in texas 2024-11-11 14:44|| 2024-11-11 14:44|| Front Page Top

#13 She'd never do it. She would have to be on the record every time she made a decision and there's no way to cover that up.

Posted by Silentbrick 2024-11-11 17:55|| 2024-11-11 17:55|| Front Page Top

#14 We've got to stop awarding a prize to everyone who participates. That's how we got (along with an unhealthy amount of cheating and rigging) the most recent POTUS, who was totally incompetent.

Posted by JohnQC 2024-11-11 19:11|| 2024-11-11 19:11|| Front Page Top

23:08 Frank C
21:24 Frank G
21:22 Seraphinianu M
21:17 Seraphinianu M
21:16 Frank G
21:04 ACAPULCO ME ENCANTA
20:45 Frank G
20:43 Ferdinand k
20:43 Frank G
20:29 Ferdinand k
20:23 trailing wife
20:18 Lord Garth
19:46 JohnQC
19:28 JohnQC
19:23 JohnQC
19:15 JohnQC
19:11 JohnQC
19:09 KBK
19:08 Frank G
19:04 trailing wife
17:55 Silentbrick
17:54 3dc
17:51 Silentbrick
17:48 Frank G