Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 11/10/2005 View Wed 11/09/2005 View Tue 11/08/2005 View Mon 11/07/2005 View Sun 11/06/2005 View Sat 11/05/2005 View Fri 11/04/2005
1
2005-11-10 Home Front: WoT
Ongoing Terrorist Operations in the U.S.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-11-10 09:30|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Wouldn't the DC snipers qualify as Islamist extremists?
Posted by ET 2005-11-10 09:58||   2005-11-10 09:58|| Front Page Top

#2 Shhhh! You're not supposed to notice them, ET.
Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford  2005-11-10 10:02|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-11-10 10:02|| Front Page Top

#3 I wonder how many of those "800 extremist groups" in the US have never done anything criminal, excepting "thought crimes"? In that a number have been around since the 1950s, and *still* haven't done anything illegal, they are hardly worth including in the list for purposes other than to puff it.

The second big boffo that is usually tried is to equate non-violent groups with violent groups of the opposite extreme. Like equating the John Birch Society, a non-violent right-wing anti-communist organization with the Weathermen, a violent left-wing anti-government organization.

The third trick is to muddle similar groups together, say Greenpeace, PETA and ALF. Greenpeace rarely engages in illegal activity, but when it does, it is usually non-violent. PETA does both, but their violence is indirect. ALF is usually violent, destructive, and now in Britain, human life-threatening with intent to be so.

That being said, Greenpeace is a generally legal annoyance; PETA may or may not be considered a corrupt organization; but ALF is clearly a threat and a criminal organization. Greenpeace should be ignored for the most part, PETA should be dealt with in civil law, but ALF should be criminally prosecuted.

This is a good outline for how that group of 800 should be objectively analyzed. Perhaps 15-20 of them fit into the last catagory.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-11-10 10:33||   2005-11-10 10:33|| Front Page Top

#4 PETA is the fundraising political front, EFL / ALF is their militant wing. PETA got caught in the past sending them money.
Posted by Steve">Steve  2005-11-10 12:29||   2005-11-10 12:29|| Front Page Top

23:44 ex-lib
23:43 Bardo
23:36 DMFD
23:35 ex-lib
23:31 C-Low
23:24 CrazyFool
23:17 ex-lib
23:09 The Happy Fliegerabwehrkanonen
23:07 ex-lib
23:01 Bardo
22:48 Captain America
22:46 Barbara Skolaut
22:30 trailing wife
22:28 Bardo
22:17 Bardo
22:15 C-Low
22:12 trailing wife
22:11 Bobby
22:05 trailing wife
22:05 Bobby
22:01 trailing wife
22:00 Asymmetrical Triangulation
21:59 Bobby
21:55 Bright Pebbles









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com