Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 11/11/2005 View Thu 11/10/2005 View Wed 11/09/2005 View Tue 11/08/2005 View Mon 11/07/2005 View Sun 11/06/2005 View Sat 11/05/2005
1
2005-11-11 Home Front: WoT
Army, USAR and Army NG Exceed October Recruiting Goals
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 11A5S 2005-11-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Thanks for the comment, 11A5S, it was the only thing I wanted to know after I read the headline.

So I guess that puts the WaPo at the good end of a bad class.
Posted by Bobby 2005-11-11 08:00||   2005-11-11 08:00|| Front Page Top

#2 I did try to read the article, until I had to retch from the spin.
Posted by Bobby 2005-11-11 08:01||   2005-11-11 08:01|| Front Page Top

#3 It's because we all know the war is lost and it will be safe to join the Army again. No wait, it's because the worst economy in 50 years is driving young people into the legions of doom for food and shelter. No wait, it's because the minorities left homeless by hurricane halliburton have been forced by circumstance to join the man.

/pick one....
Posted by Shipman 2005-11-11 08:03||   2005-11-11 08:03|| Front Page Top

#4 We also know the Reserves and Guard will never go to war! Ha!

This really goes to show our nintendo youth are just as patriotic and honor bound as all other generations.
Posted by 49 pan">49 pan  2005-11-11 08:13||   2005-11-11 08:13|| Front Page Top

#5 The Nintendo generation doesn't read the NYT, WaPo or LAT. They do however play Xbox and PS2 where the services have been co-producing games which portray an environment without the hollyweird political correctness. Someone has figured how to jump the media divide.
Posted by Cheng Theating1514 2005-11-11 08:58||   2005-11-11 08:58|| Front Page Top

#6 Typical WaPo - 9 paragraphs in the article, 7 of them negative.
Posted by Raj 2005-11-11 09:46||   2005-11-11 09:46|| Front Page Top

#7 Maybe that's why the chose to publish - as opposed to the NYT and LAT - so they could add 7 paragraphs of negative spin.
Posted by Bobby 2005-11-11 11:24||   2005-11-11 11:24|| Front Page Top

00:23 JosephMendiola
23:59 Zenster
23:52 JosephMendiola
23:51 Zenster
23:42 Zenster
23:37 Unetch Flinetch3868
23:30 CrazyFool
23:24 CrazyFool
23:19 Zenster
22:50 Elmenter Snineque1852
22:42 gromgoru
22:38 john
22:37 Penguin
22:17 Bobby
22:06 Zenster
21:52 Zenster
21:44 ed
21:40 Zenster
21:37 ed
21:29 anymouse
21:27 ed
21:19 Pappy
21:18 Glenmore
21:15 ed









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com