Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 02/04/2003 View Mon 02/03/2003 View Sun 02/02/2003 View Sat 02/01/2003 View Fri 01/31/2003 View Thu 01/30/2003 View Wed 01/29/2003
1
2003-02-04 Home Front
Australia’s Weasel Opposition: Simon Crean undermines US ally
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymous 2003-02-04 04:20 am|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 In a parliamentary system,the no-confidence motion has meaning only when the ruling party or coalition is breaking apart and a new goverment needs to be formed.It's not like the Congress in the USA voting on an issue because members of the ruling party would,in this case,be voting themselves out of power.In other words,Mr. Bean,I mean Crean, is just making a gesture of opposition.
Posted by El Id  2003-02-04 06:10:41||   2003-02-04 06:10:41|| Front Page Top

#2 Simon Crean? Not to be disrespectful of our Australian allies, but the name brings to mind Uriah Heep...
Posted by Fred  2003-02-04 10:03:23||   2003-02-04 10:03:23|| Front Page Top

#3 El Id, the article says Crean is the Leader of the Opposition. If he believes he can bring down the government, run on the issue, and make gains in the next election, he will. This is more than a gesture - if his reading of the public is correct, it could represent a chance to take power himself.

Of course, if Crean succeeded in the middle of the fight, the consequences for Australia would be dramatic and severe. Basically, he'd be the newest inductee of the Gerhard Schroder club.
Posted by Joe Katzman 2003-02-04 11:20:31|| [www.windsofchange.net]  2003-02-04 11:20:31|| Front Page Top

#4 Well, I'm not an expert on this, but if I recall correctly, Australia doesn't have a coalition---the Liberal Party (Howard's party) has an outright majority. If Crean can get a number of Liberals to vote with him, he can force a new election, but if not he's just blowing smoke.

This article

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/02/04/1044318595263.html

says that Australians are the most pro-war of all countries surveyed, including the US. That's only with UN approval, though.

Bring back Kim Beazly!

The Sydney Morning Herald is like a Guardian produced by teenagers.

(Still can't work those links. Your Link button doesn't work for me, and putting them in by hand sticks a "http://rantburg.com" in front, rendering the link useless.)
Posted by Angie Schultz 2003-02-04 13:32:32|| [darkblogules.blogspot.com]  2003-02-04 13:32:32|| Front Page Top

#5 I'm still trying to coax the Javascript into speaking Netscape. It works on IE...
Posted by Fred  2003-02-04 14:07:37||   2003-02-04 14:07:37|| Front Page Top

#6 Australia is ruled by a coalition of the Liberal Party and the Nationals which is a small conservative rural based party that has no say in pretty much anything of importance in Australia.
Posted by Paul 2003-02-04 21:48:26||   2003-02-04 21:48:26|| Front Page Top

08:17 liberalhawk
08:15 Ptah
07:29 Chuck
07:08 Murat
01:10 Michael Lonie
00:34 John Anderson
00:19 John Anderson
23:51 John Anderson
21:54 Anonymous
21:48 Paul
21:32 11A5S
20:58 Anonymous
20:49 Anonymous
20:42 Anonymous
20:42 Alaska Paul
20:40 Bman
20:15 paj
20:11 flash91
19:42 john
19:20 john
19:09 Ptah
18:59 Rw
18:59 Frank G
17:56 Alaska Paul









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com