Article

2003-03-25 Iraq

Syrian Missle Accident Theory a la Debka

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by ----------<<<<-- 2003-03-25 11:09 am|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Debka is usually best flavored with a lot of salt, but this one rings true

Posted by Frank G 2003-03-25 11:16:58|| 2003-03-25 11:16:58|| Front Page Top

#2 I like it...but let the media keep trumpeting the "Great Satan hosed a bus full of parapalegic nuns" story, anything to reduce desert traffic. Our airborne intel assets seem a little overtaxed as it is.

Posted by matt 2003-03-25 11:32:43|| 2003-03-25 11:32:43|| Front Page Top

#3 "Our airborne intel assets seem a little overtaxed as it is."

One of my old bosses is running part of this. I hear from him now and then. The biggest problem for airborne intel assets is the traffic. We have more than enough assets, just having a hard time getting them where they can do some good because of all the other aircraft in the way.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-03-25 12:19:08|| 2003-03-25 12:19:08|| Front Page Top

#4 As I told my spouse, why would anyone want to cross the border? The US army has been coming for 6 months, should have left a while ago.

Posted by Anonymous 2003-03-25 12:38:35|| 2003-03-25 12:38:35|| Front Page Top

#5 Absolutely no disrespect intended, Old Patriot. On NRO, Jed Babbin reported that the Apaches on the raid hadn't been connected to JSTARS, and I (mistakenly) assumed that they just hadn't made priority, so there must be too much going on. I shouldn't assume such things.

So now that I'm done chewing on my own ankle, a question: what will it take for airborne intel to be 'where they can do some good'? Is it primarily logistical, airbase sortie schedules, refueling, those sorts of issues?

Posted by matt 2003-03-25 13:21:40|| 2003-03-25 13:21:40|| Front Page Top

#6 It's coordinating airspace. Intel doesn't have the same priority as tactical or strategic assets, which don't have the Predator's loiter capability. Predators, on the other hand, don't handle explosions nearby very well - tends to upset the guidance. With a sandstorm in progress, and high winds, most of the Predators are probably grounded. We're relying on high-fliers and satellites, which have a rough time seeing through sandstorms. It's not impossible - we have a few tricks we can use - but it's not CAVU conditions, and the intel will be limited. As soon as things start to settle down, Predator will be up again, looking for tracks in all that fresh sand. Bad time to be in Baghdad.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-03-25 14:02:51|| 2003-03-25 14:02:51|| Front Page Top

10:11 raptor
08:38 raptor
01:28 R. McLeod
01:13 R. McLeod
00:54 R. McLeod
00:46 R. McLeod
00:44 R. McLeod
00:20 Bill
00:07 (lowercase) matt
23:45 OldSpook
23:29 tu3031
23:29 tu3031
23:20 tu3031
23:12 tu3031
23:08 tu3031
21:59 (lowercase) matt
21:50 eric
21:44 (lowercase) matt
21:39 eric
21:13 Dar Steckelberg
21:10 Dar Steckelberg
21:09 RW
21:07 Alaska Paul
21:02 Brew