Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 01/14/2004 View Tue 01/13/2004 View Mon 01/12/2004 View Sun 01/11/2004 View Sat 01/10/2004 View Fri 01/09/2004 View Thu 01/08/2004
1
2004-01-14 
Transparent Move
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2004-01-14 9:36:04 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Cut to the chase...

A modern democracy is depedent upon a modern Republic Of Laws, where the rights of the individual, not groups nor government, are (supposedly, mainly when the Dems are out of power) held as the highest good.

Remember - the US is not a Democracy, it is, as Ben Franklin said "A Republic, if we can keep it".
Posted by OldSpook 2004-1-14 3:39:31 PM||   2004-1-14 3:39:31 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Right. Regular folks in the countries described above would prefer their countries political, economic, and social systems based on the rule of law. Today. Democracy in the elective/parliamentary system can come later. The way Hong Kong was run by the Brits for several generations is a good example. No democracy in the pure sense there, but individuals and businesses there knew that they could take grievances before an independent judiciary, at least. If only we could see development in countries like Badistan similar to that of colonial Hong Kong, I think the majority of citizens would be satisfied.
Posted by Michael 2004-1-14 3:44:15 PM||   2004-1-14 3:44:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Wolfowitz is often a proponent of encouraging democracy in countries that are ruled by despots. The Philipines islands under Marcos are an example of a country that Wolfowotz defines as ready for democracy.

Zimbabwe and the current domino effect going on in South America are examples of how a democratization policy can run amok. Chaos often results when democracy is implemented in societies that lack underlying cultural respect for property rights. In these countries the populus will tend to vote into office whichever candidates espouse the most socialist redistribution of property. Over time the result is that capital flees these countries, an effect which increases poverty in locations that are often richer in resources than more prosperous nations. Corruption at all levels accelerates disaster by siphoning off any positive results of the remaining economic activity. This negative economic deevolution is like watching a slow-motion train wreck.
Posted by Super Hose  2004-1-14 9:42:05 PM||   2004-1-14 9:42:05 PM|| Front Page Top

23:57 ed
00:28 Lucky
23:33 .com
23:25 Tibor
22:35 Lu Baihu
22:18 Super Hose
22:13 Super Hose
21:51 Anonymous2U
21:46 Anonymous2U
21:42 Super Hose
21:35 Frank G
21:32 tu3031
21:28 Bomb-a-rama
21:27 Frank G
21:27 Anonymous2U
21:10 IceCold
21:10 tu3031
21:03 tu3031
21:02 Ralph
20:57 tu3031
20:55 Val
20:51 tu3031
20:43 tu3031
20:41 CrazyFool









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com