Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 01/31/2004 View Fri 01/30/2004 View Thu 01/29/2004 View Wed 01/28/2004 View Tue 01/27/2004 View Mon 01/26/2004 View Sun 01/25/2004
1
2004-01-31 Home Front
No evidence CIA slanted Iraq data
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-01-31 1:18:46 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 How they missed the mark is actually quite easy to explain. If Kay is right, then most of Saddam's weapons programs were frauds perpetrated on Saddam by the scientists, who did their best to hide the fact it was a fraud, to keep from being killed.

So, if Saddam's own people are lying to him, it is not surprising that the CIA (As well as MI6, French, German, Russian and every other western intel service) got fooled as well.
Posted by Ben  2004-1-31 4:41:30 AM||   2004-1-31 4:41:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 if you ask me a load of scuds and shit are in syria while the rest of it got bulldozed under the desert in the 9 odd months of U.N wrangling/appeasing before hand.I do howerver believe they will turn up.
Posted by Jon Shep U.K 2004-1-31 4:51:10 AM||   2004-1-31 4:51:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Ben, this also explains why the UNMOVIC Inspections never found anything. In retrospect, there was nothing to find, but the scientists did such a good job hiding nothing that even Saddam was fooled.

We should keep in mind that while Kay found no actual chemical, biological, and nuclear material, the Iraqis did have an active rocket program, and the UN sanction process was clearly unreliable. The sanctions and the "no-fly" zones were not designed as a permanent solution.

The UN resolutions were designed for Saddam to show he had destroyed his weapons programs, not for the US to prove he had or had not. Even if we now know our intelligence was flawed, it was really Saddam's obligation to demonstrate that fact to our satisfaction. Guilty until proven innocent. Even Col. Khadafi figured that out.
Posted by john  2004-1-31 8:22:00 AM||   2004-1-31 8:22:00 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 I think john has stated almost everything we need to know in a nutshell, however, this thing will be political trouble for dubya. This subject will be harped on ad nauseum up until the day of the elections, even though all of the Dem candidates thought Saddam had WMDs, too.
Posted by Les Nessman  2004-1-31 9:33:31 AM||   2004-1-31 9:33:31 AM|| Front Page Top

22:11 Kingfish
17:00 David Foster
13:57 Daniel King
09:22 Raptor
00:23 Mike Sylwester
23:58 Mike Sylwester
23:57 Phil Fraering
23:34 Alaska Paul
23:20 Alaska Paul
23:13 Alaska Paul
23:05 whitecollar redneck
23:03 Bomb-a-rama
22:42 Lucky
22:33 Old Patriot
22:28 whitecollar redneck
22:21 Lucky
22:21 mhw
22:20 Robert Crawford
22:13 mhw
22:07 Highlander
22:04 Lucky
21:57 Lucky
21:49 TS
21:49 Lucky









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com