Article

2004-04-13 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Iran Disputes USAâs Definitions of the Words "Human" and "Rights"

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-04-13 5:57:50 PM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 He said the United States is not qualified to comment on human rights issues because its actions in Palestine, Iraq,

you may want to add iran to the list! raghead

Posted by Dan 2004-04-13 6:15:15 PM|| 2004-04-13 6:15:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Don't be too hard on the Iranians, guys. They're free to dispute our definition of "human" just as much as we're free to dispute their definition of "holy land" when the ground around the mullahs consists largely of smoking craters . . .

Posted by The Doctor 2004-04-13 7:35:40 PM|| 2004-04-13 7:35:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Well, he's right. Silly Americans think "human" means a member of the species homo sapien, when everyone else clearly recognizes that term means "one who is a Muslim extremist or a supporter". IE. Rachel Corrie, that guy going nuts in Fallujah, and that Hamas leader that the Jews got last month are human. Jews, anyone with critical thought processes and people they flat out don't like aren't human.
"Rights" mean "the right to worship as we tell you to".
It's all very easy to understand once you stick your head up your ass.....

Posted by Desert Blondie 2004-04-13 8:26:08 PM|| 2004-04-13 8:26:08 PM|| Front Page Top

10:03 B
10:02 B
09:23 muck4doo
01:44 B
01:42 B
01:35 BigEdLB
01:35 OldSpook
00:31 Super Hose
00:24 Super Hose
00:20 Super Hose
00:15 RWV
00:06 Long Hair Republican
23:58 OldeForce
23:55 Frank Martin
23:38 Anonymous4156
23:35 ruprecht
23:27 Gromky
23:23 tu3031
23:18 Barbara Skolaut
23:18 Raj
23:16 Gromky
23:10 JAB
23:07 Barbara Skolaut
23:05 whitecollar redneck