Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 06/03/2004 View Wed 06/02/2004 View Tue 06/01/2004 View Mon 05/31/2004 View Sun 05/30/2004 View Sat 05/29/2004 View Fri 05/28/2004
1
2004-06-03 Iraq-Jordan
’Fallujah Battalion’ Nabs More Than 6 Tons of Weapons
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Chuck Simmins 2004-06-03 2:56:00 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 :O

Color me very surprised and skeptical.
It's wonderful if it's true.
Hell, it's fucking amazing if it's true.

I WANT TO BELIEVE.
Posted by Anonymous4021 2004-06-03 3:10:23 PM||   2004-06-03 3:10:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 note, this seems to be the ICDC, NOT the Fallujah Protective Army.
Posted by Liberalhawk 2004-06-03 3:21:57 PM||   2004-06-03 3:21:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 It's the group that refused to go to Fallujah after being attacked during transport in Baghdad. Not ICDC, but Iraqi Army. The protective services in Iraq consist of the Iraqi Army, the Iraqi Police Service, the Border Police, Iraqi Civil Defense Corps and the Facilities Protection Service.
Posted by Chuck Simmins  2004-06-03 3:46:52 PM|| [http://blog.simmins.org]  2004-06-03 3:46:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 thanks. What i meant was that this is NOT the group of local ex-soldiers who were recruited in April.
Posted by Liberalhawk 2004-06-03 4:19:28 PM||   2004-06-03 4:19:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Chuck is correct -- but I think an on-site USMC witness wrote recently that the Fallujah bug-out was misreported, and that while several army units did not perform in Fallujah, one in fact did so. I believe this was an Iraqi Army unit. Also recall that the recruits to the new army were specifically told they would NOT be used for fighting other Iraqis -- given the history, that was not a minor issue, and puts the bug-out in some perspective (though it doesn't change the need for capable and reliable Iraqi security forces).
Posted by Verlaine 2004-06-03 4:22:01 PM||   2004-06-03 4:22:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Chuck, do you know of a "guide for the perplexed" to the current Iraqi forces? Like which ones have "integrated" units, which are more regional in nature, etc.?
Posted by Phil Fraering 2004-06-03 5:43:08 PM|| [http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com]  2004-06-03 5:43:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Chuck, several marines have sent emails to various milblogs to state that the unit in question actually did not bug out. They were severely delayed by fighting on the way (where they appearently did well).
Posted by David 2004-06-03 6:53:57 PM||   2004-06-03 6:53:57 PM|| Front Page Top

13:16 Liberalhawk
13:01 Anonymous5228
08:35 Aris Katsaris
07:38 Raptor
04:55 Super Hose
04:41 Traveller
02:51 Mike Sylwester
02:11 Guest
01:36 Mike Sylwester
01:02 Super Hose
00:27 Anonymous2U
00:07 Darth VAda
23:39 Scooter McGruder
23:34 Super Hose
23:31 Aris Katsaris
23:29 Super Hose
23:22 CrazyFool
23:21 Super Hose
23:16 Barbara Skolaut
23:12 Halfass Pete
23:00 Barbara Skolaut
22:57 RWV
22:56 Lucky
22:48 Zpaz









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com