Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 06/03/2004 View Wed 06/02/2004 View Tue 06/01/2004 View Mon 05/31/2004 View Sun 05/30/2004 View Sat 05/29/2004 View Fri 05/28/2004
1
2004-06-03 China-Japan-Koreas
Shock waves in Seoul as U.S. to shift 12,000 more troops to Iraq
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymous2U 2004-06-03 1:18:49 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 [Mr. Burns] Exxxcellent. [/Mr. Burns]
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-06-03 1:24:52 AM||   2004-06-03 1:24:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 So many young, extremely affluent young South Koreans, have been calling for this for quite some time. They have NO idea what their parents went through. In many ways, they're more pampered than OUR kids.

Now reality sets in. You don't like us. We'll leave. Cover your own asses.
Posted by RMcLeod  2004-06-03 2:23:07 AM||   2004-06-03 2:23:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Good for Rumsfeld. Having troops in SK as the "buffer" to a nutbar always seemed very unfair to our guys. Take them all out. Let SK be upclose to their extended family and see if they still feel anti-American at that point. Also, it might come as a shock to SK as to how expensive it is to maintain a military.
Posted by rex 2004-06-03 2:42:27 AM||   2004-06-03 2:42:27 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Maybe they should have sent their own troops to Iraq, eh?
Posted by someone 2004-06-03 3:06:38 AM||   2004-06-03 3:06:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 The ingratitude of the younger generation South Koreans has been astonishing. This slap round the head is a good start.
Posted by Bulldog  2004-06-03 5:37:49 AM||   2004-06-03 5:37:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Here's an editorial on the subject in an english language Korean newspaper.

http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2004/06/04/200406040012.asp

This is a classic: Yes we don't like you and you are keeping us from the peacefull reunification with our norther brothers but.. don't leave.
Posted by Canaveral Dan 2004-06-03 6:55:34 AM||   2004-06-03 6:55:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Extra-ordinarily smart move. I am really impressed. The Norks are no real threat. Imagine the Norks coming across the border and finding the skors are gasp! rich! tall, well fed! have all kinds of goodies!
Posted by Phil B  2004-06-03 7:10:44 AM||   2004-06-03 7:10:44 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 "We express our full solidarity with the South Korean people, and encourage them to visit our new condominium sales office."

The Vieques Island Chamber of Commerce
Posted by snellenr  2004-06-03 9:17:24 AM||   2004-06-03 9:17:24 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 RML - if those pampered pups have no idea what their parents and grandparents went thru, shame on the older generations for not explaining it to them in detail.

After all, their culture honors the elderly. They should give the elderly the benefit of the doubt that they do know what they're talking about.
Posted by Anonymous2U 2004-06-03 10:24:50 AM||   2004-06-03 10:24:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Way funny SneelenR
Posted by Shipman 2004-06-03 10:39:52 AM||   2004-06-03 10:39:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 moral of the story - shouldn't mix politics with national security..
Posted by Dan 2004-06-03 11:54:40 AM||   2004-06-03 11:54:40 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 the Old Norks will be loving this news. In my opinion troops on the ground there are only asking for death anyway with so many of Kimmies artilary peices pointing there way,we need to rule the skys with airpower in that war and controll the seas to cut his supplys not fight it out with rifles when outnumbered 1000 to 1 by Norks.
Posted by Shep UK 2004-06-03 12:03:05 PM||   2004-06-03 12:03:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Faster, please.
Posted by docob 2004-06-03 1:10:11 PM||   2004-06-03 1:10:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 â€œthe Old Norks will be loving this news.”

Removing US soldiers will just feed their paranoia. The Norks will claim the US is removing troops in preparation for a nuclear strike.

Sometimes a paranoid is right, someone is out to get ‘em. Hehe.
Posted by Anonymous5032 2004-06-03 1:38:56 PM||   2004-06-03 1:38:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 heh it's not "american" it's "american republican"

socialist 'democrats' sold their souls a long time ago
Posted by dcreeper 2004-06-03 1:45:06 PM||   2004-06-03 1:45:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 HAHAHAHAHAHA Don't sweat it, you've got all that "Sunshine" you've been spreading up north. Let the Dear Leader freakin have 'em.
Posted by Anonymous5116 2004-06-03 2:56:11 PM||   2004-06-03 2:56:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#17 I don't think is that big a surprise, unless the South Koreans chose to ignore the signals from the US. There has been talk, for a while, of moving 2 brigades out of SK. The 12,000 troop withdrawl was proposed last year.

SK has twice the population and 40 times the wealth of NK. Withdraw the rest of the troops and let them defend themselves.
Posted by ed 2004-06-03 3:56:47 PM||   2004-06-03 3:56:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#18  As pleasant as it might be to totally withdraw from Korea,I have to admit part of me likes the idea of having airbases near China,and a friendly govt. to protect them.
Posted by Stephen 2004-06-03 4:03:36 PM||   2004-06-03 4:03:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#19 Stephen, while I understand what you're saying, I would in a half-jocular, half-serious vein respond "Okinawa," "Japan," "Nimitz-class," and (B-2) "Oklahoma." In any case, seems to me we should reduce our presence to airpower, anyway, while SK shoulders the rest of the burden. Long over-due. More to your point, I find it hard to imagine the circumstances under which SK would enable a US operation against China, in defense of Taiwan or whatever. Meanwhile, I second the kudos so snellenr -- hilarious!
Posted by Verlaine 2004-06-03 4:11:29 PM||   2004-06-03 4:11:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#20 Verlaine,I would point out that carrier aviation is short-ranged and while S.Korea prob.wouldn't allow strike missions from Korea,she would allow aerial-refueling and Awacs missions,which would be priceless.But,I would not like US servicemen to be stationed anywhere they are not welcome,or at least tolerated.
Posted by Stephen 2004-06-03 5:12:15 PM||   2004-06-03 5:12:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#21 ROFL, snellenr!

You're the winner of this thread.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2004-06-03 5:14:35 PM||   2004-06-03 5:14:35 PM|| Front Page Top

13:16 Liberalhawk
13:01 Anonymous5228
08:35 Aris Katsaris
07:38 Raptor
04:55 Super Hose
04:41 Traveller
02:51 Mike Sylwester
02:11 Guest
01:36 Mike Sylwester
01:02 Super Hose
00:27 Anonymous2U
00:07 Darth VAda
23:39 Scooter McGruder
23:34 Super Hose
23:31 Aris Katsaris
23:29 Super Hose
23:22 CrazyFool
23:21 Super Hose
23:16 Barbara Skolaut
23:12 Halfass Pete
23:00 Barbara Skolaut
22:57 RWV
22:56 Lucky
22:48 Zpaz









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com