Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 10/24/2004 View Sat 10/23/2004 View Fri 10/22/2004 View Thu 10/21/2004 View Wed 10/20/2004 View Tue 10/19/2004 View Mon 10/18/2004
1
2004-10-24 Iraq-Jordan
CIA Secretly Removes Detainees From Iraq
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2004-10-24 12:29:48 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Guess there needs to be a definition of terrorists rights.I'll start off:Dead.
Posted by crazyhorse  2004-10-24 1:01:36 PM||   2004-10-24 1:01:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 The detainees were removed without
notification to the International Red Cross, congressional oversight committees, the Defense Department or CIA investigators, the newspaper said in Sunday editions, citing unidentified government officials.


The 'right' prisoners are being taken out of country or into that good night to be emptied of information, which is what should have happened with many of the Abu Ghraib prisoners.

Good for the spooks.

The most troubling part of this story is it is by unnamed sources. More shoddy journalism by the WaPo.
Posted by badanov  2004-10-24 1:11:50 PM|| [http://www.rkka.org]  2004-10-24 1:11:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 hmmmmm - Clinton CIA bureaucrats?
Posted by Frank G  2004-10-24 1:24:13 PM||   2004-10-24 1:24:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 I saw this one coming a while back. Someone said "There are only a hundred or so foreign fighters being kept in Iraq"; to which the response was, "Aha, so that means it's the Iraqis that are rising up against the US!, NOT foreign fighters!"
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-10-24 1:24:23 PM||   2004-10-24 1:24:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Secretly?
Posted by Shipman 2004-10-24 7:50:52 PM||   2004-10-24 7:50:52 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Is this another Hersch story? Sounds like it.
Posted by Cyber Sarge  2004-10-24 8:45:35 PM||   2004-10-24 8:45:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Say it aint so, Sarge. I was hoping it was true.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-10-24 8:47:20 PM||   2004-10-24 8:47:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Lots of noise is made over the US violationg Geneva protocols is has never even signed on to. Is this one of them? Many Europeans and Americans are under the impression the USA is under all those agreements The US has not adopted all of them. Since when do the Geneva accords apply to multi national terroists and criminals anyway?

If you are fighting a nation that has violated the the accords or isn't even governed by the same political system that originally signed are we supposed to just ignore that? Well I guess we are. Thats just plain stupid.
Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom  2004-10-24 9:32:53 PM|| [http://www.slhess.com]  2004-10-24 9:32:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Once again, jihadi terrorists do NOT come under the definition of "protected persons" under the GC. But thanks for askin'...
Posted by mojo  2004-10-24 10:20:47 PM||   2004-10-24 10:20:47 PM|| Front Page Top

04:17 George Bush6334
14:48 Mrs. Davis
09:21 raptor
05:23 Bulldog
00:49 Sock Puppet of Doom
00:31 Senator Carl Levin
00:16 Moishe Sylvester
00:06 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:59 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:54 trailing wife
23:42 trailing wife
23:40 trailing wife
23:33 Mike Sylwester
23:31 anonymous2u
23:31 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:31 Mike Sylwester
23:17 Mike Sylwester
23:06 A Jackson
23:00 Mike Sylwester
22:51 Anonymoose
22:38 Bomb-a-rama
22:24 Bomb-a-rama
22:20 mojo
22:17 plainslow









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com