Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 12/03/2004 View Thu 12/02/2004 View Wed 12/01/2004 View Tue 11/30/2004 View Mon 11/29/2004 View Sun 11/28/2004 View Sat 11/27/2004
1
2004-12-03 Home Front: WoT
Dark side to US intelligence reform
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2004-12-03 2:59:53 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 A very important distiction needs to be made between the outcomes of intelligence gathering. For example, the CIA gathers intelligence to inform political leaders, then acts at a low level on their commands. An individual agent may receive direct command from the White House. The military, however, gathers intelligence to support pre-existing commands, and to optimize its effectiveness in carrying out those commands. To put this another way, the CIA acts and reacts; the military plans then executes. The distiction here is only subtle until you examine it, then it becomes obvious why the two modes of operation should be separate.
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-12-03 1:43:43 PM||   2004-12-03 1:43:43 PM|| Front Page Top

01:43 mojo
01:43 mojo
01:42 mojo
01:42 mojo
00:06 Sobiesky
00:01 mojo
23:56 Alaska Paul
23:45 Alaska Paul
23:42 Mike Kozlowski
23:35 Fred
23:29 Zenster
23:27 Zhang Fei
23:24 Zhang Fei
23:21 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:19 Matt
23:14 Robin Burk
23:13 Mark Espinola
23:11 Capt America
23:10 lex
23:06 Robin Burk
23:02 lex
22:47 mojo
22:41 JP
22:38 Zenster









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com