Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 03/20/2005 View Sat 03/19/2005 View Fri 03/18/2005 View Thu 03/17/2005 View Wed 03/16/2005 View Tue 03/15/2005 View Mon 03/14/2005
1
2005-03-20 China-Japan-Koreas
Japanese official calls for N. Korea deadline: Kyodo
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2005-03-20 12:03:53 AM|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 The last time something like this went to the Security Council, didn't France get Iraq invaded? This feels like a big stick to me.

The only problem is, right now we're a bit busy with Syria and Iran. France stalling a bit isn't necessarily a bad thing; let them expend diplomatic capital stalling the wrong battle.
Posted by trailing wife 2005-03-20 6:31:21 AM||   2005-03-20 6:31:21 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 I'd asy it's China that's getting the pressure, not France. It will be interesting to watch East Asian reaction to this statement.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-03-20 7:14:36 AM||   2005-03-20 7:14:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 TW - other than our Air Force, recon and intel capability, and logistical resupply of some materials, I suspect the S.Koreans could pretty much handle the job on their own. BTW, as the third largest contingent in Iraq, I'm sure their Army is getting some real valuable hands on experience in civil affairs and infrastructure rebuilding that they might see in the near future.
Posted by Spavimble Hupeart2664 2005-03-20 9:34:17 AM||   2005-03-20 9:34:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 The last time something like this went to the Security Council, didn't France get Iraq invaded?

Amb. Bolton ought to make sure that fact gets pointed out :-)
Posted by Steve White  2005-03-20 10:41:26 AM||   2005-03-20 10:41:26 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 The widely celebrated Six-Way Talks have and will do absolutely nothing. The quickest way to solve the North Korea problem is to have the Nork government fall, followed by a massive relief operation. In that way, the most North Koreans will be saved.

If the Chicoms want to enable the Norks by giving aid, fuel, etc, then let them be the sugar daddies and bear the cost. That cost will not only include a cash drain, but nuclar armed Japan and possibliy Taiwan.

The Six-Way Talks are just a way for Kimmie to get attention and intimidate his neighbors with the "Sea O' Fire" thing.
Posted by Al-Aska Saul  2005-03-20 11:15:32 AM||   2005-03-20 11:15:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Woops. Monikor left over from yesterday.
Posted by Alaska Paul  2005-03-20 11:16:39 AM||   2005-03-20 11:16:39 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 I'll trust to your expertise on the military stuff, Spavimble ;-) but everything I've seen out of South Korea says they have absolutely no enthusiasm for using violence to end Kim's regime. (I'm not sure they actually want Kim to fall -- they've seen the cost borne by W.Germany post-unification.) I realize my imagination is limited by my ignorance, but I don't see how a UNSC resolution would change their attitude.
Posted by trailing wife 2005-03-20 11:54:24 AM||   2005-03-20 11:54:24 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 The US might have made a deal with China that once it's been mulled over by the UNSC, the other powers will give China permission for a regime change, as long as they do it quick and clean, without letting it spread. Everyone who likes the status quo will be happy, the Norks will still be a buffer between the South and the US and China, yet will start on the path to development and away from the whole Stalinist thing. Everybody wins something.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-03-20 3:26:18 PM||   2005-03-20 3:26:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Since the US and EU love to give money away, we could together cover the cost of reunification of Korea if it came to that. Or at least share the cost. The Norks need to go. They are a menace to everyone, especially their own people.
Posted by Alaska Paul  2005-03-20 7:08:36 PM||   2005-03-20 7:08:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Spavimble - I believe that you may be overly optimistic on the ROK Army's acquiring significant hands-on experience. The Seoul regime is so reluctant to suffer any casualties that they have, essentially, restricted themselves to their own base. The Korean newspapers have reported VERY little on their activities. The only article I saw recently (and I read five Korean [English language] Korean newspapers every day) discussed the possibility of the ROK Army installing bidots in their latrines(!). A comment to a reporter by one of the locals in the town of Irbil said something to the effect that ROK Army personnel seemed to be really nice people and that the locals might get to like them even more ... if they were to ever actually get out into the town.
Posted by Michael Sheehan  2005-03-20 9:17:52 PM||   2005-03-20 9:17:52 PM|| Front Page Top

03:45 stickyour democracyinyourarses
23:57 Bobby
23:32 Anonymoose
23:27 Anonymoose
23:27 phil_b
23:19 Sock Puppet O’ Doom
23:12 Bomb-a-rama
22:56 Bomb-a-rama
22:50 Bomb-a-rama
22:46 .com
22:39 AzCat
22:35 Robert Crawford
22:33 Robert Crawford
22:33 Pappy
22:26 AzCat
22:17 Bomb-a-rama
22:14 Bomb-a-rama
21:35 Barbara Skolaut
21:29 JosephMendiola
21:17 Michael Sheehan
21:11 .com
21:04 .com
20:57 .com
20:55 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com