Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 11/16/2005 View Tue 11/15/2005 View Mon 11/14/2005 View Sun 11/13/2005 View Sat 11/12/2005 View Fri 11/11/2005 View Thu 11/10/2005
1
2005-11-16 Iraq
JDAM Putting Artillery Out of Business
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2005-11-16 09:40|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 One shot kill with 100% fatality rate is always prefered. Artillery is going the smart route too, with GPS and laser guided shells. They are more expensive, but you need fewer of them and they don't break stuff you don't want broken, so the cost evens out in the long run.
Posted by mmurray821 2005-11-16 09:46||   2005-11-16 09:46|| Front Page Top

#2  enemy gunmen never seem to catch on to the fact that going into a building, simply brings down a smart bomb

How can they? The lesson itself wipes out the learner... Not that I'm complaining, you understand.
Posted by trailing wife 2005-11-16 11:07||   2005-11-16 11:07|| Front Page Top

#3 Damn, Ms. Wife, you're in a dry humor mood today, lol. Not that I'm complaining either.
Posted by anonymous5089 2005-11-16 12:16||   2005-11-16 12:16|| Front Page Top

#4 The smart cannons I've seen recently are out of sight, but for such a mobile war, the JDAM seems much preferred.

Plus, the smart artillery hasn't been deployed in Iraq yet has it?

EP

EP
Posted by ElvisHasLeftTheBuilding 2005-11-16 12:21||   2005-11-16 12:21|| Front Page Top

#5 I recall some MLRS salvos in Iraq.

It's a kind of war issue. In a conventional war, artillery is probably going to have a lower cost per boom because of the number of targets. High fixed cost, low variable cost. But in a guerilla war, which is essentially what we have now, the target density calls for a system that can respond to a lot of locations infrequently due to the target dispersion. So a low fixed cost high variable cost solution is actually cheaper.

Now if they had pgm mortar rounds...
Posted by Glolugum Thease1214 2005-11-16 12:41||   2005-11-16 12:41|| Front Page Top

#6 Fly boys have been putting artillery out of business for 70 years. However, let me go out on a limb with a prediction. In 20 years, a manned warplane will a thing of the past, whereas arti will still be going strong (hint: there are such a thing as non-PC wars against competent---AA wise, enemy).
Posted by gromgoru 2005-11-16 13:40||   2005-11-16 13:40|| Front Page Top

#7 I am very sceptical of the manned or UCAV putting the artillery out of business in the long run. As the range and accuracy of artillery increases the factors of reduced risk to air crew will eventually come into play. One thing I am surprised we have not seen in Iraq is the return of the firebase concept in some areas. This could be accomplished in a number of different ways from mobile batteries of 155mm SP guns to orbiting BUFFs in areas where ground troops are conducting operations. The smaller aircraft are limited in their ordance capacity and loiter time unless refueling is an option. As to smart mortar rounds I would think that GPS and laser guided should be possible but what would the cost be compared to a TOW????????

Just my $.02
Posted by Cheaderhead 2005-11-16 16:07||   2005-11-16 16:07|| Front Page Top

#8 "so your grandfather was a kamikaze pilot, huh?
Bet he has a lot of stories"
"nope"
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2005-11-16 17:01||   2005-11-16 17:01|| Front Page Top

#9 Let's just remember that artilley ahs a far shorter reaction time (tens of seconds, instead of tens of minutes) than aviation. If the ennemy is harrassing you with mortar fire and you have artillery (nowadays that means radar-controlled artillery) he will be able to shoot only once
Posted by JFM">JFM  2005-11-16 17:43||   2005-11-16 17:43|| Front Page Top

00:14 JosephMendiola
23:52 JosephMendiola
23:52 Frank G
23:49 JosephMendiola
23:46 JosephMendiola
23:36 Scott R.
23:34 rjschwarz
23:16 Zenster
23:07 C-Low
22:57 Zenster
22:53 Zenster
22:50 Frank G
22:45 trailing wife
22:38 Zenster
22:37 Spurt Shereter8116
22:32 Frank G
22:30 trailing wife
22:27 Zenster
22:27 2b
22:26 Alaska Paul
22:11 Zenster
22:07 Zenster
22:00 Witt
21:59 Whutch Threth6418









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com