Article

2006-03-01 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Senior Iran cleric sez whacking embassies ok

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2006-03-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Well sure it is! Geez, wotta dumb question. Anything, anything at all, that advances the interests of mullahs and imams is specifically and automatically okey-dokey. Just ask 'em and they'll tell you. Why, they'll even dig up some Sura or something and "interpret" it for ya. Silly fucking infidels.

Posted by .com 2006-03-01 00:16|| 2006-03-01 00:16|| Front Page Top

#2 If all countries having embassies in Tehran closed them for a week in protest of this outrageous pronouncement, do you think they might change their minds. Probably not. You have to possess one before it can be altered.

Posted by GK 2006-03-01 00:30|| 2006-03-01 00:30|| Front Page Top

#3 I wonder how the nations of the remaining embassies in Iran will rationalize keeping them open.

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-03-01 00:51|| 2006-03-01 00:51|| Front Page Top

#4 Well we don't have to worry about that. I think any Zeropian nation that keeps an Embassy open in Iran is stone cold stupid. Iran has a habit of grabbing up people and holding them hostage. I Thinbk the Zeropians forgot that. I hope they burn a few and take some hostages. It will force things.

It's better sooner than later.

Posted by SPoD 2006-03-01 01:06|| 2006-03-01 01:06|| Front Page Top

#5 Mosques are the embassies of the Islamists.

Let's take him at this word.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2006-03-01 11:23|| 2006-03-01 11:23|| Front Page Top

#6 Mosques are the embassies of the Islamists.

Brilliant, BP. It's time to outlaw Islam in all countries that practice freedom of religion.

Posted by Zenster 2006-03-01 12:11|| 2006-03-01 12:11|| Front Page Top

Senior Iran cleric sez whacking embassies ok

Cool!

Let's start with yours. :-D

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2006-03-01 19:05|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html] 2006-03-01 19:05|| Front Page Top

#8 Does this really surprise anybody???

Posted by bgrebel 2006-03-01 19:06|| 2006-03-01 19:06|| Front Page Top

#9 Lol, Barbara! :-)

Posted by .com 2006-03-01 19:09|| 2006-03-01 19:09|| Front Page Top

#10 Senior American computer geek says whacking mosques okay from now on.
Oh yeah, clerics too.

Posted by wxjames 2006-03-01 19:11|| 2006-03-01 19:11|| Front Page Top

#11 Attacks on embassies may and are normally considered de facto ACTS OF WAR, espec iff done with host nation/Govt approval. Iran, etal. can not give State andor Ideo-Faith-specific sanction to PC/PDeniable, individual acts of terror but then claim the State-Faith is NOT per se responsible. THE CLERIC > EITHER KILL US OR WE WILL KILL YOU, SURRENDER/CONCEDE AND WE MIGHT DECIDE TO SPARE YOU, .......ETC. AFTER ALL, CLINTONISM > FASCIST = LIMITED COMMIE LEFT/COMMIE-MAJORITY MAINSTREAM AMERIKANS WANT TO BE RULED BY ANYONE EXCEPT AN AMERICA, CORRECT!? MOTHERLY RADICAL ISLAM, ETAL. IS MERELY DOING WHAT AMERIKANS WANT ANYWAYS AND HELPING YOU DESTROY YOURSELVES AND YOUR COUNTRY FOR THE GOOD OF EVERYONE.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-03-01 21:43|| 2006-03-01 21:43|| Front Page Top

23:56 2b
23:53 3dc
23:50 2b
23:42 trailing wife
23:35 3dc
23:35 trailing wife
23:30 Barbara Skolaut
23:08 Barbara Skolaut
22:59 Remoteman
22:58 Frank G
22:55 RWV
22:50 Photle Graviger5976
22:47 JosephMendiola
22:45 Bobby
22:42 JosephMendiola
22:41 Bobby
22:40 RWV
22:38 DMFD
22:37 SR-71
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:35 DMFD
22:34 .com
22:34 trailing wife
22:32 trailing wife