Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 03/05/2006 View Sat 03/04/2006 View Fri 03/03/2006 View Thu 03/02/2006 View Wed 03/01/2006 View Tue 02/28/2006 View Mon 02/27/2006
2006-03-05 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran's nuclear agenda
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2006-03-05 04:14|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [267 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Building a red racer trigger?
Posted by 6 2006-03-05 09:32||   2006-03-05 09:32|| Front Page Top

#2 .... Jeeez.
Building a red racer fusion trigger?
Posted by 6 2006-03-05 09:33||   2006-03-05 09:33|| Front Page Top

#3 At least publicly, though, the Bush administration has followed a different strategy than it did with Iraq. After the failure to discover weapons of mass destruction there, President Bush has never argued that Iran poses an imminent threat, and his aides have called for diplomacy.

Ignoring the obvious lie here, why should he? The imminent threat isn't to the United States, it is to Europe and the Middle East. It is also to Russia, but they are too short-sighted to see that.
Posted by 2b 2006-03-05 09:37||   2006-03-05 09:37|| Front Page Top

#4 To date, the most comprehensive public estimate is by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, an arms analysis group in London. "If Iran threw caution to the wind," John Chipman, the institute's director, said, it might be able to make fuel for a single nuclear weapon by 2010.

lol! The New York Times. A group actively working towards their own demise.
Posted by 2b 2006-03-05 09:45||   2006-03-05 09:45|| Front Page Top

#5 Bush never called Saddam an imminent threat, either. He said we shouldn't wait till he became an imminent threat.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-03-05 10:24||   2006-03-05 10:24|| Front Page Top

#6 What no one seems to address in these kinds of articles is how soon Iran would have the wherewithal to produces truly ugly dirty bombs. Surely that would be adequate for their purpose, if not generating quite the testosterone thrill of a true nuclear weapon?
Posted by trailing wife 2006-03-05 13:33||   2006-03-05 13:33|| Front Page Top

23:55 JosephMendiola
23:45 JosephMendiola
23:36 C-Low
23:24 Sherry
23:17 Captain America
23:15 Captain America
23:13 2b
23:08 Frank G
23:06 JosephMendiola
23:06 C-Low
22:56 incarnate of lee atwater
22:55 JosephMendiola
22:53 C-Low
22:40 Frank G
22:38 Danking70
22:38 SteveS
22:38 Angineth Glaviper9578
22:34 anymouse
22:30 Angineth Glaviper9578
22:25 3dc
22:02 .com
22:00 .com
21:57 .com
21:56 SteveS

Search WWW Search