Article

2006-03-14 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2006-03-14 15:45|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Can some lawyer explain to me if this is SOP? I thought that once you filed charges, the prosecuter had all the "evidence" needed to get a conviction. If this is SOP you could indict anyone and dig until you gound something.

Posted by Cyber Sarge 2006-03-14 17:32|| 2006-03-14 17:32|| Front Page Top

#2 I think the prosecutor only needs to get enough evidence for an indictment. Once discovery begins, though, they can keep asking for as much as they want.

Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford 2006-03-14 18:56|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2006-03-14 18:56|| Front Page Top

#3 I read about this today and it seems that since the CONSPIRACY charge was thrown out and the case was on hold on appeal, Earle kept on issuing subpeonas when it is comsidered improper to do so and is almost Prosecutorial Misconduct in Texas.

Posted by Brett 2006-03-14 19:26|| 2006-03-14 19:26|| Front Page Top

#4 Sounds like the mess is getting fuzzier.

Then again this is Texas. Anyone remember when the Texas state rep Democracs when into hiding over the board, 1998?

Posted by Icerigger 2006-03-14 19:31|| 2006-03-14 19:31|| Front Page Top

10:50 mmurray821
23:59 Snuns Thromp1484
23:58 JosephMendiola
23:49 phil_b
23:44 Snuns Thromp1484
23:41 DMFD
23:36 trailing wife
23:30 lotp
23:28 DMFD
23:27 Angump Slomosing6697
23:19 Formerly Dan
23:16 3dc
23:11 Inspector Clueso
22:49 JosephMendiola
22:34 BH
22:26 Frank G
22:25 JosephMendiola
22:24 Frank G
22:18 Frank G
22:13 Frank G
22:13 Frank G
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:54 Ulaigum Ebbereck6419
21:51 JosephMendiola