Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 04/01/2007 View Sat 03/31/2007 View Fri 03/30/2007 View Thu 03/29/2007 View Wed 03/28/2007 View Tue 03/27/2007 View Mon 03/26/2007
1
2007-04-01 Home Front: Politix
Iraq war funding in limbo on Hill
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dave D. 2007-04-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 he should call them back to special session - just to f*ck with them and put a bigger spotlight on their overseas junketing/politicking while they ignore the troops' funding and pack the bill with unnecessary bribes and pork. Let them bitch and whine about it - their approval rating should end up in single digits
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-04-01 10:31||   2007-04-01 10:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid balked at the deadline yesterday and cited a congressional report that showed war funds will not expire until July.

Typical Dem BS. Yes, all the money won't be gone until July, but between then and now every other program or activity will be sucked dry of every uncommitted dollar. Development programs will be delayed or cancelled. Procurement programs will be delayed or cancelled. Spares will not be bought. Training will cease. These despicable bastards will gut the US military and it will take years to undo the damage done. The FCC prevents me from saying what I think about these disingenuous, dissembling traitors.
Posted by RWV 2007-04-01 12:11||   2007-04-01 12:11|| Front Page Top

#3 RWV, the administration, will, of course, fail to mount an aggressive public affairs campaign based on what you describe. Why, that would only be educating the public on a vital national mattter while rightly rebuking and humiliating an irresponsible (sometimes insane) opposition party. Can't have that during war-time.
Posted by Verlaine 2007-04-01 13:23||   2007-04-01 13:23|| Front Page Top

#4 Sorry, but having seen up close and personal the long slow bleed caused by the Dems trying to cash in the "peace dividend" associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union, I know what's coming and it won't be pleasant. The services are, on average, 40% smaller now than they were in 1989. That said, when there is money for spares, fuel, ammunition, and training no other country or group of countries can stand against the US. Which is why, I guess, the Dems feel it necessary to insure that there won't be money for spares, fuel, ammunition and training, or for anything else for that matter.
Posted by RWV 2007-04-01 14:07||   2007-04-01 14:07|| Front Page Top

17:11 Old Patriot
23:28 Old Patriot
23:22 Old Patriot
23:14 RD
23:05 RD
23:05 Grumenk Philalzabod0723
22:59 Grumenk Philalzabod0723
22:56 RD
22:51 trailing wife
22:50 Asymmetrical T
22:45 Grumenk Philalzabod0723
22:41 twobyfour
22:36 Grumenk Philalzabod0723
22:33 Zenster
22:33 Barbara Skolaut
22:28 tu3031
22:26 Zenster
22:25 Grumenk Philalzabod0723
22:23 Theamble Forkbeard2343
22:18 Zenster
22:12 tu3031
22:07 sinse
22:07 tu3031
22:01 sinse









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com