Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/26/2007 View Wed 04/25/2007 View Tue 04/24/2007 View Mon 04/23/2007 View Sun 04/22/2007 View Sat 04/21/2007 View Fri 04/20/2007
1
2007-04-26 Iraq
U.S. soldier accused of aiding the enemy
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2007-04-26 07:35|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 U.S. soldier accused of aiding the enemy

Is he a member of Congress?
Posted by Excalibur 2007-04-26 08:59||   2007-04-26 08:59|| Front Page Top

#2 Can't be a Congresscritter cause you're not suppose to hold two federal offices at the same time [though Senator Goldwater somehow got a waiver no one contested a while back].
Posted by Procopius2k 2007-04-26 09:04||   2007-04-26 09:04|| Front Page Top

#3 Will they have the guts to prosecute on these charges? Will the evidence hold up?

Or, will he be allowed to resign his commission?
Posted by Chuck Simmins">Chuck Simmins  2007-04-26 09:40|| http://northshorejournal.org]">[http://northshorejournal.org]  2007-04-26 09:40|| Front Page Top

#4 Kinda surprising. TF-134 ran a very tight ship, in my experience, so this is quite a disappointment. Law of averages, I suppose.
Posted by Verlaine 2007-04-26 11:37||   2007-04-26 11:37|| Front Page Top

#5 Hmmm sounds like a great candidate for an open Donkocrat state or congressional seat. During his campaign he can clam he was HOUNDED by the Bushitlers for his outspoken stance against the war.
Posted by Cyber Sarge 2007-04-26 11:50||   2007-04-26 11:50|| Front Page Top

#6 Then-SecDef Cheney was also a USNR A-6 B/N, FWIW.
Posted by USN. Ret. 2007-04-26 14:39||   2007-04-26 14:39|| Front Page Top

#7 "Soldier"? This guy's no soldier, he's a Lt. Col!
Posted by Parabellum 2007-04-26 17:55||   2007-04-26 17:55|| Front Page Top

#8 providing an unmonitored cell phone to detainees.

Kewl, that way all the apprehended suspects could be identified to the enemy in case they got turned.

He'll have a lot of time to think about it in Kansas

"I say we give him ten years in Leavenworth!"

"How about eleven years in Twelveworth?"

"What about five and ten at Woolworth's?"

[/Marx Brothers]
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-04-26 21:47||   2007-04-26 21:47|| Front Page Top

#9 Doesn't directly aiding the enemy like that fall under the classification of actual Treason. Forget nuances like Laval Reid; would this be an open-and-shut case?
Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2007-04-26 22:25|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2007-04-26 22:25|| Front Page Top

23:53 JosephMendiola
23:41 FOTSGreg
23:34 badanov
23:22 Dave S
23:09 Zenster
23:08 Barbara Skolaut
23:06 Mac
23:03 Zenster
23:01 Mac
22:55 trailing wife
22:48 Jackal
22:47 DMFD
22:45 Jackal
22:45 trailing wife
22:43 Jackal
22:40 xbalanke
22:36 Jackal
22:30 Jackal
22:29 Jules
22:29 Huffington Pout
22:27 trailing wife
22:25 Jackal
22:22 trailing wife
22:21 Jackal









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com