Article

2008-02-23 Iraq

Catastrophe Averted, 5000 lb. Truck Bomb Uncovered

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Glenmore 2008-02-23 16:15|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top

#1 I'm sure this will be a lead news item at the NY Times and Al-Jazeera

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2008-02-23 16:25|| 2008-02-23 16:25|| Front Page Top

#2 Isn't using relief trucks as weapons some kind of war crime?

Not if you're a terr-er-militant. Then it's simply "resistance" or "activism."

Posted by xbalanke 2008-02-23 16:45|| 2008-02-23 16:45|| Front Page Top

#3 Well, the thing is that the rules of war were designed to create an economic barrier of entry into warfare so as to keep the riffraff out of it. In order to fight within the rules of war, one needs some significant financial backing and training and leadership not generally found in the lower classes. The purpose is to reserve war fighting for the upper classes as far as the conduct of it is concerned. Rabble can't afford uniforms and don't really care about rules. The British thought as much about us not playing by the rules in the Revolution. Imagine, us hiding behind rocks rather than standing in neat lines and facing our enemy!

Posted by crosspatch 2008-02-23 16:58|| 2008-02-23 16:58|| Front Page Top

#4 I'm sure this will be a lead news item at the NY Times

Indeed - well, perhaps not lead. More four lines on page B-110.

Posted by DMFD 2008-02-23 17:10|| 2008-02-23 17:10|| Front Page Top

#5 sad thing is that it's not just the NY Times but you will prob never hear about this in any other media outlet

Posted by sinse 2008-02-23 18:01|| 2008-02-23 18:01|| Front Page Top

#6 George Washington and the Continental Army didn't slaughter civilians with kegs of gunpowder.

The rules of war were created to try and keep disputes between governments as much as possible, and provide a bare minimum of protection. Rabble could wear uniforms if they wanted, but they don't want to, because wearing one makes you a huge target anywhere you go - that's the entire purpose of a uniform, to distinguish between civilians and soldiers.

I remember crosspatch; he's the one who called us brutal fascists because we don't agree with his worldview. Unlike others, I can have a difference of opinion with someone else, and it doesn't mean that they're unfeeling racists. But then again, I'm not closedminded.

Posted by gromky 2008-02-23 18:29|| 2008-02-23 18:29|| Front Page Top

#7 Isn't using relief trucks as weapons some kind of war crime?

The Red Crescent is the internationally recognized symbol for "contains weapons and/or irregular combatants".

Posted by SteveS 2008-02-23 18:45|| 2008-02-23 18:45|| Front Page Top

#8 I guess I'm a brutal fascist then because this sort of attack is aimed primarily at civilians and that is a war crime. It was when Timothy McVeigh did it in OKC and it would have been here as well.

Terrorists are war criminals. They deserve the penalty for non-uniformed combatants spelled out by the Geneva Convention, to be shot out of hand on the battlefield.

PS. Don't try to tell me that Dresden, Tokyo, and the Hiroshima/Nagasaki attacks were war crimes as well - those were legitimate economic targets, if nothing else, during a long, brutal war and without those attacks thousands, possibly millions more would have died and the war would have gone on for perhaps a decade more.

Posted by FOTSGreg">FOTSGreg 2008-02-23 18:47|| 2008-02-23 18:47|| Front Page Top

#9 The 'Rules of War' were a creation of the late 19th Century finding a home in the Hague and Geneva Conventions more than over a 100 years after our experience in the War of Independence where the British thought nothing of letting the natives loose to butcher along the frontier. Just like AQ in Iraq, that disregard of and targeting of civilians drove fence sitters and even those who were up to that time Crown loyalist Tories to throw in with the Continental Congress.

Posted by Procopius2k 2008-02-23 18:54|| 2008-02-23 18:54|| Front Page Top

#10 Isn't using relief trucks as weapons some kind of war crime?

Turd Worlders aren't required to follow the laws of war.

Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford 2008-02-23 19:08|| 2008-02-23 19:08|| Front Page Top

23:34 Frank G
23:12 Vortigern Glealing9111
23:03 Fred
23:01 crosspatch
22:59 SR-71
22:57 SR-71
22:53 Pappy
22:52 3dc
22:51 Barbara Skolaut
22:43 Barbara Skolaut
22:43 Beau
22:36 Barbara Skolaut
22:35 Frank G
22:26 Skunky Glins5285
22:13 CrazyFool
22:11 Abdominal Snowman
22:07 JerseyMike
22:04 Procopius2k
21:50 john frum
21:36 trailing wife
21:36 rjschwarz
21:33 rjschwarz
21:27 Atomic Conspiracy
21:18 Skunky Glins5285