Article

2010-02-22 Home Front: Politix

George Will Challenges Donna Brazile's GOP 'Party of No' Nonsense

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2010-02-22 00:00|| || Front Page|| [3 views ] Top

#1 "But unfortunately, you have a Republican Party that has decided that by saying no, they can, you know, perhaps gain more at the polls this coming fall."

She is right. The Republicans need to say "HELL NO!" not just "no".

Posted by crosspatch 2010-02-22 12:14|| 2010-02-22 12:14|| Front Page Top

#2 Sometimes little children need to hear the word "no" so they learn where the boundaries of acceptable behavior are. Sometimes you have to slap their wrists or even spank their little butts.

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-02-22 12:31|| 2010-02-22 12:31|| Front Page Top

#3 spank their little butts.

Don't tell Barney Frank that. He'll see it as incentive

Posted by Frank G 2010-02-22 14:50|| 2010-02-22 14:50|| Front Page Top

#4 Hopefully the Party of "No Socialism"

Posted by HammerHead 2010-02-22 15:11|| 2010-02-22 15:11|| Front Page Top

#5 Saying NO to stupiod, incendiary or destructive ideas isn't obstructionism, it's maturity and sanity.
This idea that the best way is always the middle way, or that government has a role to play in every aspect of life, we just need to moderate what that role is, is nuts.

The best reatment for cancer isn't a slower growing tumor, it's no tumor! The cancer of government growth into every aspect of our lives is the cancer that will destroy America. Saying NO to it isn't wrong, it's life-saving! What kind of a moron doesn't get this simple fact?

Posted by NoMoreBS 2010-02-22 16:05|| 2010-02-22 16:05|| Front Page Top

#6 aaaargggggh. I miss spell check!

Posted by NoMoreBS 2010-02-22 16:06|| 2010-02-22 16:06|| Front Page Top

#7 Firefox has a built in spellcheck

Posted by Frank G 2010-02-22 19:02|| 2010-02-22 19:02|| Front Page Top

#8 If they are the party of NO, then the Dems must be the party of Duhhh. I mean, they had a big enough majority that they didn't need a single Repug vote (in theory) to pass whatever they wanted, and still couldn't manage to do it.

Posted by Cornsilk Blondie 2010-02-22 21:01|| 2010-02-22 21:01|| Front Page Top

23:46 ed
23:44 ed
23:43 ed
23:41 3dc
23:38 ed
23:36 rjschwarz
23:32 rjschwarz
23:27 rjschwarz
23:02 GirlThursday
22:56 JosephMendiola
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:43 JosephMendiola
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:29 ed
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:19 JosephMendiola
22:14 JosephMendiola
22:09 ed
21:59 Mike Hunt
21:58 Raj
21:54 ed
21:50 tu3031
21:49 ed
21:49 49 Pan