Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 03/02/2010 View Mon 03/01/2010 View Sun 02/28/2010 View Sat 02/27/2010 View Fri 02/26/2010 View Thu 02/25/2010 View Wed 02/24/2010
1
2010-03-02 Home Front: Politix
Pelosi: Lawmakers Should Sacrifice Their Jobs for Health Care
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Delphi 2010-03-02 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 You first...

-- Love, Democrats
Posted by badanov 2010-03-02 00:01|| http://www.freefirezone.org  2010-03-02 00:01|| Front Page Top

#2 The Volcano Gods must be angry and are withholding jobs until they get a worthy sacrifice.
Posted by gorb 2010-03-02 02:10||   2010-03-02 02:10|| Front Page Top

#3 Just saw "Shrek" with the little guy....and one line from Lord Farquaar exhorting the people of Duloc to go rescue Princess Fiona while he safely sits on his butt at home seems to sum up Madame Pelosi's views:

Some of you may die, but.....it's a price I'm willing to pay.
Posted by Cornsilk Blondie 2010-03-02 04:45||   2010-03-02 04:45|| Front Page Top

#4 Pictures of Steve Jobs being sacrificed on a Maya altar to Huizpilotchli Health Care.
Posted by JFM  2010-03-02 06:29||   2010-03-02 06:29|| Front Page Top

#5 Can't Get Enough by Bad Company

Posted by Glinemble Turkeyneck3080 2010-03-02 07:03||   2010-03-02 07:03|| Front Page Top

#6 That comment will go over well in California where they have 12% unemployment and rising.
Posted by DarthVader 2010-03-02 08:18||   2010-03-02 08:18|| Front Page Top

#7 Pelosi: Lawmakers Should Sacrifice Jobs the Constitution for Health Care

Let's be clear about this. It's about power. There is no longer consent.

Posted by Procopius2k 2010-03-02 08:27||   2010-03-02 08:27|| Front Page Top

#8 Some Republican should take her up on her offer and promise (before a lots of cameras) to vote for the bill if Pelosi resigns immediately.
Posted by ed 2010-03-02 08:30||   2010-03-02 08:30|| Front Page Top

#9 Hell, he should even offer to charter a private plane back to San Francisco out of his own funds so that Pelosi would no longer be a leech on the American taxpayers' backside.
Posted by ed 2010-03-02 08:34||   2010-03-02 08:34|| Front Page Top

#10 Pelosi is up for re-election in 2010. Her approval ratings in most of the country are very low. Any chance her district will stop smoking weed and sniffing glue and do the rest of the country a great service by dumping her?
Posted by JohnQC 2010-03-02 10:31||   2010-03-02 10:31|| Front Page Top

#11 Any chance her district will stop smoking weed and sniffing glue and do the rest of the country a great service by dumping her?

No. She is an accurate representation of her constituency, and, there are some that feel she is too conservative.
Posted by Gleasing Oppressor of the Platypi1858 2010-03-02 10:37||   2010-03-02 10:37|| Front Page Top

#12 Well, it's not like they'd be giving up their *pensions*


Posted by Elmoluper Lumplump4024 2010-03-02 10:42||   2010-03-02 10:42|| Front Page Top

#13 #11 Any chance her district will stop smoking weed and sniffing glue and do the rest of the country a great service by dumping her?

No. She is an accurate representation of her constituency, and, there are some that feel she is too conservative.


How scary is that? Still, SF is a beautiful place in spite of the loonies.
Posted by NCMike 2010-03-02 10:50||   2010-03-02 10:50|| Front Page Top

#14 There are small islands of beauty in SF, but mostly is a urine soaked dump, which is the natural outcome of the entrenched liberal politics of the city. Mix in a little George Romero, what with all the drugged zombies and mentally unstable roaming the streets and then you have the true picture of SF.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2010-03-02 10:57||   2010-03-02 10:57|| Front Page Top

#15 #12 Well, it's not like they'd be giving up their *pensions*

Posted by: Elmoluper Lumplump4024 2010-03-02 10:42

And, let's not forget their "Cadillac" health plans.
Posted by WolfDog 2010-03-02 10:58||   2010-03-02 10:58|| Front Page Top

#16 Voting this morning at my precinct in the Texas Primary this morning was very interesting. At 7AM this morning when the polls opened, there was no one voting in the Democratic Primary booth area, but there were 6 of us lined up at the Republican Promary booth area at that Precinct. The 6 people who were lined up to vote were white, black, hispanic and one (wild?) Indian. The winners of the political parties today will run against each other come November...
Posted by Alistaire Angique6243 2010-03-02 11:17||   2010-03-02 11:17|| Front Page Top

#17 And you all snickered when Cindy Sheehan ran against this witch in the last election. But the truth is you would have been better off if Sheehan had won. You should have contributed all the money you could afford to Sheehan's campaign.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-03-02 12:35||   2010-03-02 12:35|| Front Page Top

#18 That's right. I wrote "witch" with a "w" and not a "b". Just look at the picture and you can see why. All she needs is a pointy, black hat and a broom.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-03-02 12:37||   2010-03-02 12:37|| Front Page Top

#19 Consent of the governed isn't a requirement in a system of rule.

Fred, in the long run the consent of the governed IS a requirement. Coerced at the point of a gun, but still consent. Historically any people that is pushed too far ceases to consent and either overthrows the government or is killed trying.
Posted by Glenmore 2010-03-02 13:14||   2010-03-02 13:14|| Front Page Top

#20 Historically any people that is pushed too far ceases to consent and either overthrows the government or is killed trying. No, that system is called "government by lack of resistance from those permitted to live."
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-03-02 13:32||   2010-03-02 13:32|| Front Page Top

#21 The basic requirement of a system of rule is that some people give the orders & others agree to take those orders. Just how to choose the ones who give the orders is the crucial difference.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2010-03-02 13:36||   2010-03-02 13:36|| Front Page Top

23:58 OldSpook
23:58 Procopius2k
23:54 OldSpook
23:43 OldSpook
23:10 Hotspur666
23:02 Redneck Jim
22:53 Procopius2k
22:53 Redneck Jim
22:47 badanov
22:35 GirlThursday
22:24 Hotspur666
22:23 GirlThursday
22:19 GirlThursday
21:52 Thing From Snowy Mountain
21:41 Thing From Snowy Mountain
21:36 Procopius2k
21:24 European Conservative
20:52 Broadhead6
20:24 Frank G
20:23 DMFD
20:11 trailing wife
20:07 newc
20:07 trailing wife
19:54 tu3031









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com