Article

2016-07-14 Home Front: Politix

Ruth Bader Ginsburg regrets "ill-advised" criticism of Donald Trump

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-07-14 10:31|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 The batty lady needs to retire.

Posted by DarthVader 2016-07-14 11:21|| 2016-07-14 11:21|| Front Page Top

#2 Ill advised?
Is she saying somebody, like an interviewer, suggested she broach the subject, and our illustrious Supreme Court Judge did not have the wherewithal to dismiss and/or reject the suggestion?

Is she that mentally pliable, or just dishonest?

Earlier this week I agreed with Assad, now I think Trump threw a triple-20 first throw...too early for a red-beer?

*Actually, her comments were so foul, she would have been called for traveling in the WNBA. Certain stations in life have an obligation to not flap their drink holes, and I think that has a lot to do with the NYTs editorial the other day, where if something to do with the election ends up in the Supreme Court she must recluse herself and that knocks out a shoe in vote for The Clinton Foundation.

Posted by swksvolFF 2016-07-14 11:30|| 2016-07-14 11:30|| Front Page Top

#3 This seemed like a sorry/not sorry apology to me. Besides, the damage is already done.

Posted by Spinesing Gray3122 2016-07-14 11:41|| 2016-07-14 11:41|| Front Page Top

#4 Yup; like a goofy toddler repeatedly sticking her finger in an electrical outlet, then blaming the outlet for blisters on her finger. And she was the one who took the child safety off of the outlet.

Posted by swksvolFF 2016-07-14 11:49|| 2016-07-14 11:49|| Front Page Top

#5 How would you have felt if the JCS had said that publicly about your 'Lightbringer'?

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-07-14 12:03|| 2016-07-14 12:03|| Front Page Top

#6 "I'm sorry some of you people are too stupid/dishonest to understand what I said."?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-07-14 13:47|| 2016-07-14 13:47|| Front Page Top

#7 Missing the subtle nuances.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-07-14 15:24|| 2016-07-14 15:24|| Front Page Top

#8 Ruth should also apologize for her ILL-advised Supreme Court decisions.

Posted by airandeee 2016-07-14 20:40|| 2016-07-14 20:40|| Front Page Top

23:55 Skidmark
22:36 Barbara
22:34 swksvolFF
22:34 Rob Crawford
22:34 Blossom Unains5562
22:32 Rob Crawford
22:28 Blossom Unains5562
22:21 phil_b
22:21 Blossom Unains5562
22:06 Charles
21:40 Glenmore
21:03 phil_b
20:53 Silentbrick
20:40 airandeee
20:39 Skidmark
20:16 Frank G
20:12 Claising Flavimble5530
20:04 JohnQC
20:01 Procopius2k
20:00 European Conservative
19:57 Regular joe
19:45 JohnQC
19:42 swksvolFF
19:40 European Conservative