Archived material Access restricted Article

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 06/10/2019 View Sun 06/09/2019 View Sat 06/08/2019 View Fri 06/07/2019 View Thu 06/06/2019 View Wed 06/05/2019 View Tue 06/04/2019
2019-06-10 -Land of the Free
Justice Ginsburg Hints At Outcome Of Supreme Court’s Biggest Cases
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2019-06-10 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [415 views ]  Top

#1 They are NOT Citizens, Damnit. What kind of Bench are you sitting at?
You are the Worst Justice since Hugo Black.
This is leftist Pavlom - Lawless to it's core.
Posted by newc 2019-06-10 01:53||   2019-06-10 01:53|| Front Page Top

#2 A 'deeply divided' court - assisted by statements made by a sitting Justice.
Posted by Raj 2019-06-10 07:41||   2019-06-10 07:41|| Front Page Top

#3 ..deeply divided between those who believe they are the law and those who believe that which is written in the Constitution is the law.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-06-10 07:50||   2019-06-10 07:50|| Front Page Top

#4 I can't wait until she keels over.
Posted by DarthVader 2019-06-10 08:42||   2019-06-10 08:42|| Front Page Top

#5  stretch deference beyond the breaking point

Just do your fucking job, Hag. Yours is not to analyze or control whom the truth favors in the end.
Posted by Dron66046 2019-06-10 08:55||   2019-06-10 08:55|| Front Page Top

#6 Electoral votes are apportioned based on voters, not simply people living in a district. This is a no-brainer.
Posted by rjschwarz 2019-06-10 09:39||   2019-06-10 09:39|| Front Page Top

#7 RJ, is that right? For a long time slaves couldn't vote but their numbers (well, 60% of them) were counted in determining the number of Representatives, and thus the Electoral College representation.
Posted by Glenmore 2019-06-10 10:59||   2019-06-10 10:59|| Front Page Top

#8 A coalition of civil rights groups and Democratic state governments sued to stop the question’s inclusion, saying it will depress minority participation in the census.

Not including the census question on citizensip seems like it would defeat the purpose of the census, that is counting the population. The census is also necessary to determine the numbers in the House and the number of Electors from each State and how Federal funds are to be allocated.
Posted by JohnQC 2019-06-10 12:02||   2019-06-10 12:02|| Front Page Top

#9 Glenmore, now I'm doubting myself. Were women counted as part of the census before they were allowed to vote?
Posted by rjschwarz 2019-06-10 15:34||   2019-06-10 15:34|| Front Page Top

#10 Women were counted.
Posted by rjschwarz 2019-06-10 15:35||   2019-06-10 15:35|| Front Page Top

#11 re #8: JohnQC, your last sentence explains exactly why Democrat-run states want the citizenship question banned. If the census doesn't count the non-citizens, their population is less, so they don't get as many representatives in the House, and they get less Federal money to spend.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2019-06-10 16:19||   2019-06-10 16:19|| Front Page Top

#12 ...its more than that. If the preliminary numbers are available NLT October 2020, it will be 'interesting' when far more votes are cast the next month in a district/state than there are adult citizens.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-06-10 16:55||   2019-06-10 16:55|| Front Page Top

23:05 Rob Crawford
22:00 Skidmark
21:34 Procopius2k
21:32 Procopius2k
21:30 Procopius2k
21:29 Procopius2k
20:43 Varmint Splat1454
20:36 Skidmark
20:30 Varmint Splat1454
20:10 Skidmark
20:05 Silentbrick
20:03 KBK
20:02 KBK
19:59 jpal
19:59 Airandee
19:44 Elmomomble Crusosing2364
19:23 Bobby
19:05 Dale
18:38 Glitle Slurong9613
18:28 SteveS
18:09 Thrise Shomble3667
18:08 Glitle Slurong9613
17:54 NoMoreBS
17:49 DarthVader

Search WWW Search