Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 05/11/2020 View Sun 05/10/2020 View Sat 05/09/2020 View Fri 05/08/2020 View Thu 05/07/2020 View Wed 05/06/2020 View Tue 05/05/2020
1
2020-05-11 Home Front: Politix
Following Last Week's Release Attorney Clevenger Alleges Office of DNI Has Communications Between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks – Russia Collusion a Lie!
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Clem 2020-05-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [10 views ]  Top

#1 Actual Wikileaks source destroyed 10 July 2016. Kak disturbing, high profile pro-Brexit/pro-Scotland Independence Craig Murray receives very stern message.

No leads, no suspects, no interest. Anyone who brings up the topic is immediately labeled a conspiracy theorist. End of discussion.

Russian hacker narrative lives on. What are your questions ?
Posted by Besoeker 2020-05-11 00:48||   2020-05-11 00:48|| Front Page Top

#2 Related: Free Beacon - FLASHBACK: MSNBC, CNN Derided Flynn as Treacherous Russian Asset

In 2016 it was 'all hands on deck' with the Russian narrative.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-05-11 01:08||   2020-05-11 01:08|| Front Page Top

#3 It's just simply pathetic, isn't it?
Posted by Clem 2020-05-11 09:00||   2020-05-11 09:00|| Front Page Top

#4 From page 32 of 80 of Mr. Henry's testimony, representing Crowdstrike:

MR. SCHIFF: It provides in the report on 2016, April 22nd, data staged for exfiltration by the Fancy Bear actor.

MR.HENRY:Yes,sir. So that, again, staged for, which, I mean, there's not -- the analogy I used with Mr. Stewart earlier was we don't have video of it happening, but there are indicators that it happened. There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don't have the evidence that says it actually left.


[My emphasis) So the DNC data was set up to be stolen, but there were no indicators discovered that showed it had actually been stolen. That was the April, 2016 attack (page 27).

There was a subsequent September attack, which used different tools than the earlier attack, and was successful. (Page 28) I do not, at this time, understand the timing and significance of the second attack.

Henry's Transcript
Posted by Bobby 2020-05-11 10:22||   2020-05-11 10:22|| Front Page Top

#5 Unless, of course, the September 2016 hack has something to do with the Seth Richards/Wikileaks affair.
Posted by Bobby 2020-05-11 12:59||   2020-05-11 12:59|| Front Page Top

#6 Shortly after the murder I read somewhere a strange report about it I do not remember where.

It was reporting of an interview with the emergency room physician who treated Seth Rich when he arrived at the hospital.
That Doctor stated that he believed that Rich would recover from his wounds, and arranged for a bed for him in the hospital. In checking on rich later, he is said to have claimed that police, or people claiming to police had prevented access to Seth's room, even to doctors. And as a result, this doctor claimed, Seth had died, I guess from loss of blood, during the night.
This was such a peculiar story, which was published before I was aware that Seth worked for the DNC, that it did not seem to be politically motivated; just spooky. I wonder if there was any truth to it.
If so he was actually murdered in the hospital.
Posted by daniel  2020-05-11 15:32||   2020-05-11 15:32|| Front Page Top

#7 I remember something like that, too, daniel, you're right.

And then there is that g.d. f'in kurva Debbie Wasserman Schultz....
Posted by Clem 2020-05-11 15:32||   2020-05-11 15:32|| Front Page Top

#8 More on #4, from page 79 of 80 -

MR. HENRY: Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.

So no direct evidence, like the subsequent hack, but circumstantial evidence sufficient for CrowdStrike to conclude it was taken. Not exactly "no evidence" as the GP article states.
Posted by Bobby 2020-05-11 16:25||   2020-05-11 16:25|| Front Page Top

23:11 gorb
22:22 SteveS
21:48 Procopius2k
21:34 SteveS
20:49 swksvolFF
20:39 swksvolFF
20:38 swksvolFF
20:37 swksvolFF
19:26 Frank G
19:17 Frank G
18:56 ruprecht
18:47 magpie
18:43 Marilyn Tojo7566
18:42 charger
18:38 Whiskey Mike
18:32 Marilyn Tojo7566
18:30 JohnQC
18:07 Frank G
17:56 ranture
17:53 ranture
17:45 Dale
17:15 Mercutio
17:07 Spot
17:07 Matt









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com