Article

2020-07-09 Home Front: Politix

New York Times columnist: Biden should agree to debate Trump only if two conditions met

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Frank G 2020-07-09 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11134 views ] Top

#1 I don't guess Trump should have any terms though , right?

Posted by Chris 2020-07-09 01:05|| 2020-07-09 01:05|| Front Page Top

#2 lol, negotiating from a position of weakness, how's that working for you?

Posted by Bob Grorong1136 2020-07-09 06:50|| 2020-07-09 06:50|| Front Page Top

Perhaps Plugs could use Thamsanqa Jantjie style sign language during the debates and Soetoro could provide the audio translation ?

Posted by Besoeker 2020-07-09 06:54|| 2020-07-09 06:54|| Front Page Top

#4 lol, negotiating from a position of weakness, how's that working for you?

As well as negotiating against Trump, which means it ain't working well at all.

Posted by Raj 2020-07-09 07:50|| 2020-07-09 07:50|| Front Page Top

#5 Financial transparency? from Biden?? I thought Friedman couldn't sink any lower than his slimy groveling before the none too bright Emperor Xi. Perhaps proof that for the socialist there simply is no igneous level, they just keep going down.

Posted by Cesare 2020-07-09 07:52|| 2020-07-09 07:52|| Front Page Top

#6 Trump’s two conditions must be for a Biden to 1) identify Hunter’s Ukraine Intelligence handler, 2) identify Hunter’s Chinese Intelligence handler.

Posted by Jack Salami 2020-07-09 08:51|| 2020-07-09 08:51|| Front Page Top

#7 I think Hunters tax records would be much more interesting.

Posted by CrazyFool 2020-07-09 09:16|| 2020-07-09 09:16|| Front Page Top

#8 Let's re-open the rape investigation against Biden.

Posted by AlmostAnonymous5839 2020-07-09 10:12|| 2020-07-09 10:12|| Front Page Top

#9 Hiding works for Biden.
This is just a gambit to allow him to hide with a fig leaf of coverage. If Trump gives in they 'hope' they'll have something to bash him on, but knowing Trump I think he might have very clean tax records, in fact he might have even paid a bit more than required and is just waiting the right time to pounce.

Posted by rjschwarz 2020-07-09 10:46|| 2020-07-09 10:46|| Front Page Top

#10 IRS has had Trump's tax returns all this time and never said boo. What do these people expect to find?

Posted by Abu Uluque 2020-07-09 12:48|| 2020-07-09 12:48|| Front Page Top

#11 What do these people expect to find?

Nothing. They expect to find nothing. They expect to create a temporary, just before elections, public impression of quite a bit of something.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-07-09 12:51|| 2020-07-09 12:51|| Front Page Top

#12 Yeah, and Trump should demand at least one live, in-depth debate lasting at least 3-4 hours with honest unbiased questioners and honest fact-checkers too.

In lieu of not being able to find honest questioners and fact checkers, have at least one 3-4 hour live debate and let it rip. Voters will sort it out for themselves.

Posted by JohnQC 2020-07-09 13:57|| 2020-07-09 13:57|| Front Page Top

#13 Trump should require Rush Limbaugh as the moderator for one of the "debates". Biden can keep his supporters, er, "journalists", for the other two.

Posted by Rob Crawford 2020-07-09 17:37|| 2020-07-09 17:37|| Front Page Top

23:58 Injun Shuque2147
23:23 Solomon Henbane9032
23:14 Shusock Bumble3141
22:46 JohnQC
22:40 JohnQC
22:40 trailing wife
22:37 ECOnhzna
22:22 trailing wife
22:20 rjschwarz
22:02 trailing wife
21:58 trailing wife
21:42 Thing From Snowy Mountain
21:41 Thing From Snowy Mountain
21:36 Skidmark
20:58 Ho Chi de Medici7372
20:36 Clem
20:35 Clem
20:28 Jay-Dubya
20:22 Clem
20:10 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:57 magpie
19:43 Frank G
19:40 Frank G
19:38 Frank G