| Submit your comments on this article |
| Israel-Palestine |
| Jerusalem Kindergarten Targeted in Rock Attack |
| 2004-04-26 |
| Arabs hurled rocks at a kindergarten in the northern Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Zeâev this morning. No injuries were reported. |
| Posted by:TS (vice girl) |
| #109 BMN you are so stupid I do not know where to start wherever did you get the idea that being against Zionism was the same as against Judaism? I and many Jews(yes thats right)are against the evil that has been in THE HOLY LAND , the heinous evil of Zionism that desecrates the land of Abraham(born in Iraq)Moses and Jesus Christ.It is very sad those little children at the Kindergarten have to live in and be indoctrinated in such an Entity. |
| Posted by: Antiwar 2004-04-26 1:08:50 PM |
| #108 Ex-lib you indeed deserve to die slowly maybe from a cancer that attacks all your bones and organs you are so filled with evil venom and hatred you probably will. |
| Posted by: Antiwar 2004-04-26 1:00:05 PM |
| #107 I have nothing against Judaism just Zionism. Btw did you look at the Alkhilafah website? |
| Posted by: Antiwar 2004-04-26 12:05:02 PM |
| #106 Odd duck indeed. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2004-04-27 7:57:46 AM |
| #105 Just like I said before There seems to be a lot of verbage going on. Tiresome reading. BOTTOM LINE COWARDS MAKE THIER POINT BY ATTACKING KIDS No other thing need be said |
| Posted by: Anonymous4052 2004-04-27 1:51:32 AM |
| #104 I wonder if indeed Fred has caught himself a live one here. |
| Posted by: B 2004-04-27 1:45:45 AM |
| #103 "War is never the solution" Yes, the best solution is to die quietly and honorably and hope they run out of bullets... and rocks... and big sticks. Antiwar--I love how you wish cancer on people who disgree with you and save your vitriol for people who toss their gum on the sidewalks. The world would be a better place today with you in charge--Saddam and his sons would still be running rape gangs, torture chambers, and prisons for children while people who toss their gum on the sidewalks would be shot. Yes, truly it would be Shangri La if GWB had his priorities in order! |
| Posted by: Dar 2004-04-26 11:40:53 PM |
| #102 War is never the solution Jen. Btw if you know so much about "God's chosen people" you will know of course that they are forbidden to form a State by Torah decree. Many Jews do NOT support the Zionist Entity and indeed protested at the white house whe Sharon visited. If you don't believe me go to Neturei Karta(www.nkusa.org) and see for yourself. People like you do Jews no favours indeed you add to their tribulations. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 11:23:48 PM |
| #101 Unlike you, Anti, I support the War on Islamist Terror whevever it raises its ugly head: Iraq, Afghanistan under the Taliban, and the "Palestinian" areas with the Intifada! America was attacked by IslamoNazis on 9/11 and 3,000 of our civilian citizens were killed in an hour and a half. Now, we're taking this war --THAT WE DIDN'T START--back to the terrorists! And if you're really Aussie (which we all doubt), they killed 200 people, including 80 Aussies, in Bali that were simply there to enjoy their holiday. Operation Iraqi Freedom is not a "war on Semites." It's part of the War on IslamoFascism, many of whom are Arabs. And Zionist Israel, which exists because Jews want it to, is one of our biggest allies! And given the level of Anti-Semitism in Europe during and after WWII and given the level RIGHT NOW, why shouldn't Jews want a land of their own? Yes, it was given to them, God's Chosen People, thousands of years ago. But they fought for it far and square--against the Arabs--and won it in 1947, in 1967 and in 1973 and they fight for it today, everyday in the Intifada, where the Arabs are trying to kill off the Jewish people one bomb at a time. Go suck on an Israeli bulldozer if you "think differently," you terrorist apologist! |
| Posted by: Jen 2004-04-26 11:06:58 PM |
| #100 Right I'M not the one who's antisemitic. Unlike most of you I do not support the occupation of Iraq. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 10:56:11 PM |
| #99 Hold on BMN! GKarp is not GK. I got here first. GKarp, find another handle so as not to confuse the discussion. |
| Posted by: GK 2004-04-26 10:54:07 PM |
| #98 GK-- "Anti"war believes in antisemitic conspiracy stories and she links jihadi websites and quotes every talking point from her white lefty Jew-hating middle-class associates, but she's just an "anti-Zionist." Surely you understand that. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 9:04:17 PM |
| #97 FWIW, this URL should have appeared on the Den Beste quote I posted above: http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2003/09/RadiationcontaminationinI.shtml |
| Posted by: GKarp 2004-04-26 9:02:57 PM |
| #95 dave D...I missed your comment when I posted mine. It's enlightening no? Too bad we don't have a resident psychologist to give us a better clue. I think it's dain bramage....but...she's too evil to be just retarded. |
| Posted by: B 2004-04-26 8:52:14 PM |
| #94 Raptor, check this out, s/he did respond to that point: #18 . . . It is very sad those little children at the Kindergarten have to live in and be indoctrinated in such an Entity. In other words, it was a good thing (in Antiwar's mind) for these kids to get terrorized. Some newfangled kind of education for toddlers, I guess. |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 8:33:51 PM |
| #93 As I said not one word of condemnation on these assholes throwing rocks at babbies.What's up with that Anti.Do you hate all babbies or just Jew babbies? |
| Posted by: raptor 2004-04-26 8:14:43 PM |
| #92 Saying one is "pro-Jews" but "against Zionists" is about as strange as saying that one "supports the troops" but is "against America" or "hates Bush." It's all schizophrenic, crazy bullshit and lies to boot. Antiwar is a Leftist Useful Idiot. What's interesting is that hook hand or no, her siding--and that of the entire Loony Left--with Islamist terrorism is virtually indistinguishable from the cant of the killers themselves. I think that Antiwar=Rachel "Pancake" Corrie type. |
| Posted by: Jen 2004-04-26 7:48:10 PM |
| #91 If "she"'s a mulla in disguise, then what's the over/under on "her" having a hook for at least one hand? |
| Posted by: Laurence of the Rats 2004-04-26 7:42:02 PM |
| #90 Semper Fi, exlib. Glad to have you aboard. You're right, the lefties are sick in the head. |
| Posted by: Sgt.DT 2004-04-26 7:41:02 PM |
| #89 Dave D. It sure was an eye-opener! She's (he's) a real bad guy! How about that. I had no idea, before today, how "Islamic" she is. When I first started on Rantburg, I thought she was just some misguided Aussie lib. Then my suspicions started to mount. Today the cursing, and the claim about her ownership of books (another Islamic style claim of "greatness"), were really amazingly strange. Hey--maybe she's really a mullah in "disguise." I think you've got something there--about the mental health issue stuff. Or maybe it's moral issues leading to mental health issues. Kind of hard to say which came first. In any case, Western liberalism reminds me a lot of the Arab culture of blame. Sick and immoral. At least her cover's been blown, her "minaret" toppled--just like in Iraq today, thanks to our Marines! |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2004-04-26 7:30:55 PM |
| #88 Christopher Scheer When times are tough, always go to the son of the North Korea apologist for support. *ack* Robert Scheer reproduced? |
| Posted by: eLarson 2004-04-26 7:16:59 PM |
| #87 BMN I read rather a lot I actually own 834 fiction books and 986 nonfiction books. This is one of many times that antiwar proudly tells us about her reading ability. It's jmho..but I think she is retarded. No really, I do. Why else do we get this..."I've got to read 6 books today" type crap. "She's" a retard..and an anti-semetic one at that. |
| Posted by: B 2004-04-26 7:03:43 PM |
| #86 ex-lib: Actually, today's outburst wasn't the first from our "Auntie"; she's indulged in a couple of them over the past few months. But to those who only saw today's performance, I imagine it was an eye-opener. For what it's worth, I no longer view extreme leftism as a political phenomenon. To me, it appears more as a mental health issue: there is something deeply, profoundly defective about these people (and, to be fair, whatever counterparts they may have at the opposite political extreme). I sometimes wonder whether these people, back in childhood, may have been potty-trained with cattle prods. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2004-04-26 6:42:47 PM |
| #85 Bulldog: I agree with your house of mirrors statement, but what is signifcant about today is that Antiwar revealed her true agenda--instead of the usual "oh, the poor downtrodden, misuderstood, oppressed (by the U.S.) hurt ones that we should all be caring about . . . " stuff. See, that's her usual style. (Wow. Did she miss a page, today or what?!) Now--things will never be the same for her again here. As an "operative," hoping to change (some) people's minds through reiteration of her message of "caring, " she's finished. Besides that, I still think she had help today. They should have stuck with their original format. People at least afforded her some credibility as a genuinely misled non-thinking liberal. Of course, I always knew she wasn't, 'cause I used to be a "genuinely misled non-thinking liberal." |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2004-04-26 6:07:43 PM |
| #84 If you mean the Jew-hating types, yes, she has plenty of friends. Yeah, but one of 'em's going to prison! |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 6:01:31 PM |
| #83 Thirdly, do you really think she has friends? If you mean the Jew-hating types, yes, she has plenty of friends. |
| Posted by: Rafael 2004-04-26 5:56:40 PM |
| #82 This debate is getting slightly silly Getting?! Any discussion with Antiwar's like a nip into a House of Mirrors. Argument doesn't get much stupider than a session with the moron-in-chief. ex-lib - I don't think there's more than one Antiwar out there. Firstly, I don't see why her posting language can't have changed with time (and experience!). Secondly, the quality of her posts remains at a level which would be hard to duplicate. Thirdly, do you really think she has friends? Fourthly, a reference to a precise number books is something of an Antiwar trait. A revealing peculairity. Wrestling with pigs, anyone?! |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2004-04-26 5:52:18 PM |
| #81 No, not silly, but rather telling about the mindset of liberals. The debate (?) about whether it was appropriate to have a Jerusalem Kindergarten Targeted in Rock Attack, got sidetracked by an interesting bit of self-disclosure on the part of one of the contributors. âAntiwar,â RBâs self-appointed judge of what is right about the islamofascists (and wrong about the West), digressed from her usual liberal humanistic rubbish and personally wished ill (see #13 above) on a contributor who challenged Antiwarâs preconceptions. The rest, as they say, is history . . . |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 5:49:31 PM |
| #80 This debate is getting slightly silly. |
| Posted by: chinditz 2004-04-26 5:24:50 PM |
| #79 To "Antiwar-Confronter" : An "Agent of Satan"? You honor me too much. They said the same of Jesus, the Crucified One, the Lord of Glory, Whom I (try to) serve. If I have offended you, you best take it up with Him. (And He's calling the shots on eternity, last I heard--not you. ) Now, regarding your new name change: No. No. No. No! I know I've been telling you that you should choose another name--been reminding you to do that for weeks now--but you CAN'T choose that name. Me--ex-lib--I'm the Antiwar confronter! See, I confront you. You just nanner and nanner dumb stuff. Besides, as a name, "Antiwar-Confronter" (tum-ta-da-dum!) sounds like some kind of wacky comic book name. I mean really, it does. Just doesn't have the same ring in English as it must have in your head (via translation from your native language). To my fellow (sane) Ranters: Many thanks to ALL of you, (especially to mucky my favorite ducky). I so much ( ! ) appreciated everyone's kind support regarding the weird Antiwar attack postings. (Nothing like a "front row seat" . . . and I thought they were all such nice people . . . ) No doubt this will make Antiwar's day--but my mom died of cancer just a few months ago, and I am also (genetically) at high risk and am presently trying to ward off a possible onset (which reminds me--I should probably stop sitting here and go and take a walk)--so Antiwar's bizzare little escapade hit a bit of a raw nerve . . . for about half a second, I think it was. Here's my take on today, for whatever it's worth: First: "Yawn" --to the vitriol spewed by the enemies of freedom. Second: I think Antiwar-Confronter is probably a "pal" of Antiwar. I bet they're working together at the same computer, bouncing back and forth. The old posts from Antiwar don't sound like these--different structuring, peculiar word choices and ordering, etc. "Antiwar Confronter" sounds like an infantile Islamic terrorist type who is perhaps trying to protect the original Antiwar or stand in for Antiwar--don't know for sure, but it's something like that. Anyway, writing is kind of like fingerprints--it's unique to the person--and this is all very suspicious . . . and disgusting to boot. I think B said it best: "Once again enlightening the American and European population that we are dealing with barbarians from centuries gone by. Thanks for the reminder guys." Yeah. Thanks Antiwar-Confronter! You, along with the kindergarten attackers, did us a big favor today by showing your true colors and strengthening our resolve to fight against all you stand for in every way possible. And you will lose. Promise. (start music) "It's gonna be a bright, bright, sunshiny day . . ." |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2004-04-26 5:13:57 PM |
| #78 i used to like antiwar but not if she is antisemetic. im not thinking those kids even know what zionism is. |
| Posted by: muck4doo 2004-04-26 3:35:27 PM |
| #77 11A5S-- She also likes the "I'm not antisemitic, I like Arabs" one too. Betcha you never heard THAT one before. Of course she wouldn't know who Wilhelm Marr is, though I'm sure she'd like him, too. She's a Jew-hater and historically illiterate. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 3:35:22 PM |
| #76 (Channelling Anti-War) Well, if it wasn't for the "occupation"(tm) of the Kindergarten, then there wouldn't be a problem. Not to mention that according to Hamas, these little kids will one day grow up to be soldiers. Therefore, they are legitamate targets. |
| Posted by: Daniel King 2004-04-26 3:33:24 PM |
| #75 Fred: I'm not sure who or what Antiwar is, but this is the second time that she has spread the "Khazar" libel here. For those who don't know what the Khazar libel is, it is the contention that the European Jews are not Semitic. This libel contends that all European Jews are descendents of the Khazars, a Medieval Turkish tribe that converted to Judaism. This libel is consistently used by anti-semites in the US to defame the Jews and has been picked up by the Pals and the Islamists to deny the Jewish right to live in Israel. I personally consider it to be second only to the "blood" libel in its scurrilousnees and seriousness. Antiwar has established her credentials as an antisemite. I respectfully ask that she be banned. Rantburg should not tolerate this sort of behavior. |
| Posted by: 11A5S 2004-04-26 3:32:14 PM |
| #74 "I actually own 834 fiction books and 986 nonfiction books" Know the exact number, do ya? Anybody got a copy of DSM-IV handy? There's got to be a diagnosis in there, somewhere. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2004-04-26 3:31:24 PM |
| #73 I have nothing against Judaism just Zionism. Same old mindless prattle of someone who doesn't comprehend the definition of "Zionism". |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2004-04-26 3:29:38 PM |
| #72 I read rather a lot I actually own 834 fiction books and 986 nonfiction books Yes, well, as we both know Jew-haters are VERY prolific writers. But don't despair, they mostly say the same thing over and over and over again, as is apparent from yuor own writing. Besides, do you really need ANOTHER new edition of Protocols of the Elders of Zion? The five or six you've already internalized are surely enough. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 3:21:52 PM |
| #71 yet still has not condemed the assholes who were throwing rocks at school full of babbies Why should she condemn it? She supports it. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 3:18:21 PM |
| #70 BMN I read rather a lot I actually own 834 fiction books and 986 nonfiction books. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 3:17:32 PM |
| #69 Robert-- All she reads is National Socialist/Islamofascist stuff, though it's obvious she's only semiliterate. al-Khalifah (=Caliphate), Scheer...obviously Chomsky (another person who can't tell us why al-Husseini spent the war in Berlin--so he doesn't even mention it in his work, and then there's the holocaust-denial book for which he wrote an introduction). |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 3:13:12 PM |
| #68 Did you guys notice that Antitwit,in all her Bovine Scatology,blames it all on those evil"Zionist"and yet still has not condemed the assholes who were throwing rocks at school full of babbies. Get a clue bitch these people are"Evil Incarnate". |
| Posted by: raptor 2004-04-26 3:11:53 PM |
| #67 ex-lib: Antiwar speaks just like an Isamofacist! Antiwar: If you do not you risk permanent annihilation and will not share in the Earthly Paradise He has planned for the righteous Set and match to ex-lib. Well played, ex-lib, well played! |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 3:09:19 PM |
| #66 who was it that say something about odd duck. |
| Posted by: muck4doo 2004-04-26 3:08:50 PM |
| #65 Robert stop watching Foxnews. What the hell does Foxnews have to do with anything? Or is this the latest "tactic" of the brainless to avoid evidence they don't like? Funny thing is, Foxnews wasn't around in 1990 and 1991, and I doubt I'm the only person who remembers "give sanctions a chance" being the rallying cry of the peacenuts. So she's (?) reading a pro-fascist apologist's screed to support her fantasies? What a surprise. |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 3:07:18 PM |
| #64 Ex-lib You are indeed an Agent of Satan. May you swallow your pride and ask for God's forgiveness. If you do not you risk permanent annihilation and will not share in the Earthly Paradise He has planned for the righteous |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 3:06:40 PM |
| #63 I have been coming to Rantburg for months now, and recently began commenting. I find it highly educational and informative site, one of my favorites on the web. What I'm leading up to here is a request to Fred that he do whatever it takes to ban the tiresome antiwar. She has been fouling threads here for far too long, wasting bandwidth with immature kneejerk responses. She adds nothing to to the conversation, and detracts MUCH. |
| Posted by: docob 2004-04-26 2:57:22 PM |
| #62 Christopher Scheer When times are tough, always go to the son of the North Korea apologist for support. Next, "Anti"war, you ought to read Rene Guenon, another fascist convert to Islam. There sure seemed to be a lot of those on the postwar European right, and I'm sure you'd feel right at home there. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 2:55:50 PM |
| #61 "Ex-lib you indeed deserve to die slowly maybe from a cancer that attacks all your bones and organs you are so filled with evil venom and hatred you probably will." Whoa, baby! Put the rock down! Antiwar speaks just like an Isamofacist! I guess she's been around these guys so long, now she's even starting to sound like one herself. Imagine that. Unless she is one of those guys . . . I wonder . . .) According to Anti Well, that's just silly. And according to her (him) I "deserve to die from cancer that attacks all my bones and organs." Wow! And she didn't even add "Have a nice day." No flower child, this one. All those who support the Islamos are this way deep down. Or, sometimes, not so deep down! At least now we all can see how very peaceful "Antiwar" really is. I knew if I just kept trying, I could bring out her (his) true character. (I think it was my supposition regarding Anti Antiwar--whatever your real name is: Your demonic curses and witchcraft against me, and any other person you attack here in like manner, are declared NULL and VOID + In the Name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Amen. + By the Sign of the likeness of His Cross. (Note: You attempt to send actual evil my way. Okay. That's your free choice. You get to decide which team you're gonna be playing for. But just so you know--I don't want that you should die of cancer or any other horrific malady. I would like, instead, that you be set free and come to the full knowledge of the Truth. That you would be filled with real peace and real love--perfect gifts coming down from the Father of Lights. I would like that you would turn around and begin living for the One Who truly loves you, despite all. That you would live according to a heartfelt, surrendered commitment to God Himself, through our Lord Jesus Christ, Who will judge the living and the dead upon His return, Who is the Author of your life and mine, and to Whom you will be required to give an account, along with the rest of us, when you do die--as we all must. Secondly, to clarify something that may be troubling you: When I say that "all Islamo psuedo-men need to die" as I have in other posts, I am speaking as, perhaps, a soldier might, especially in the context of war specifically. As human beings we can and must--as terrible a responsibility as it is--bring the sword against the kind of evil exemplified and carried out by the adherents of the kinds of nihilistic political social structures instituted and promoted by murdering oppressors--in this case Islamic oppressors, who have declared war on the West, and on decency and honor and freedom. So please don't feel like I'm threatening you per se. It's a necessary and right perspective for those of us who refuse the lie of liberal relativism.) Now that we're square on all that: What was that you were you saying about those cute little kindergarten kids? |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2004-04-26 2:51:53 PM |
| #60 Cingold if you support Dubya then you should be ashamed. I am going to go to bed now and will read The Five Biggest Lies Bush Told Us About Iraq by Christopher Scheer etc. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 2:51:28 PM |
| #59 Ah, Antiwar . . . So you have no philosophical basis for wishing ill on someone who does not agree with your liberal humanistic fascism? Then, you would be merely a bigot and an idiot. Is that the case? Or, on what basis do you wish ill on those who challenge your opinions? It is an apparent contradiction for someone claiming to be âantiwar,â isnât it? And, yes, I fully support President George W. Bush, but I don't call him "Dubya." Is it those kinds of nuances that allow you to say you're not a New Ager? |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 2:42:17 PM |
| #58 B. - no man no way I would hold my breath for this idiot. but she/he/it posts/spews bull.... and what is the aniwar-confronter??? sounds and smells like anti-war...nazi-zionist collaboration...spent too much time in arab texts.. and there it goes again with the dubya shit... more rants from an idiot - can't even bring thoughtfull responses to a debate... |
| Posted by: Dan 2004-04-26 2:40:42 PM |
| #57 Cingold I already said NO.Are you a Dubya supporter? |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 2:35:35 PM |
| #56 I repeat, again: Antiwar, let me make this simple. You are a New Ager, aren't you? Inquiring minds want to know, and BTW rules of evidence would indicate that your silence tends to prove you are a New Ager. |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 2:32:20 PM |
| #55 he Nazi-Zionist collaboration is true I did not make it up The Arab-Nazi collaboration is not only true, but ongoing, and "Anti"war is its lawyer. I did not make it up. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 2:32:13 PM |
| #54 Robert I would NEVER support sanctions.The Nazi-Zionist collaboration is true I did not make it up. Cingold NO. Are you a Dubya Supporter? |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 2:30:53 PM |
| #53 "Antiwar-Confronter": Calling into question the absolute, unvarying truth of the UNQUESTIONABLE WORD OF ALLAH is a real good way to get accused of heresy. |
| Posted by: mojo 2004-04-26 2:29:57 PM |
| #52 I am very much against the Nazis Oh, not very much. And indeed, the Arabs don't appear to be against them at all. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 2:29:12 PM |
| #51 Robert stop watching Foxnews.BMN you are beyond hope. TS(vice girl-really hahahaha do you get paid for it?)What the hell are you on about-tired from a hard nights work?I am very much against the Nazis there hope I set your mind at rest. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 2:26:38 PM |
| #50 I repeat: Antiwar, let me make this simple. You are a New Ager, aren't you? Inquiring minds want to know. |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 2:19:22 PM |
| #49 I would never support sanctions. Odd. The antiwar movement was all in favor of sanctions in 1990 and 1991. The whine I remember from them then was "give the sanctions a chance". BMN thE Zionists collaborated with the Nazis and learned their lesson well and practice it today. Well, as if we needed any more evidence that antiwar was a disgusting little beast. Do you really consider yourself a moral person? How? |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 2:17:01 PM |
| #48 Antiwar, let me make this simple. You are a New Ager, aren't you? |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 2:12:56 PM |
| #47 antiwar-You said MOST of the people you care for are menatlly disabled, not all. That is beside the point tho really, as someone who is a health care worker should not be a person who wishes bone cancer on someone who disagrees with their political views. You have no business providing healthcare for ANYONE. I can only hope that someone traces you, finds out who you are, and reports your comments to your employer. You talk so much about Nazi's, no wonder...maybe you admire that they actually did the things you are talking about to their opponents, medical experiements, giving people diseases, etc. |
| Posted by: TS (vice girl) 2004-04-26 2:12:54 PM |
| #46 e propaganda do you think Alkhilafah made up those photos and if so how? They collected every photo of a birth defect they could find in Iraq and put them in once place. They left out all the healthy births, and gave no indication of how common or uncommon the conditions are. They also excluded any explanation of those conditions except the ones they wanted you to believe -- ie, no mention of inbreeding, nutrional problems, or defects that just naturally pop up on occasion. Now do you understand how it can be propaganda? |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 2:11:27 PM |
| #45 There seems to be a lot of verbage going on. Tiresome reading. BOTTOM LINE COWARDS MAKE THIER POINT BY ATTACKING KIDS No other thing need be said |
| Posted by: Anonymous4052 2004-04-26 2:10:50 PM |
| #44 Robert yes I know they were UN mandated but maybe as a member the US could have had the sanctions lifted instead of supporting the as necessary(as in Madeleine Albright Ah, "Anti"war, one of your patients is posting on your computer again. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 2:10:47 PM |
| #43 There seems to be a lot of verbage going on. Tiresome reading. BOTTOM LINE COWARDS MAKE THERE POINT BY ATTACKING KIDS No other thing need be said |
| Posted by: Anonymous4052 2004-04-26 2:10:17 PM |
| #42 Chinditz(Evert?)no speed.Cingold what the bloody hell was that. Robert yes I know they were UN mandated but maybe as a member the US could have had the sanctions lifted instead of supporting the as necessary(as in Madeleine Albright)I would never support sanctions. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 2:09:06 PM |
| #41 Dan...I hope you aren't holding your breath! |
| Posted by: B 2004-04-26 2:08:05 PM |
| #40 antiwar - you are contradicting yourself and showing your true colors. a person who trully believes in no-war (what i take from ant-war) would not take sides in a war. you discredit yourself with this thread. you should change your name to anti-jew..... i am no lover of jews or arabs but do believe that all people have the right of self-defense. and please do not start ranting about the paleos...if so then include the jordanians, eyptians, brits, turks/ottomans in your response. these are all the countries that at one time occupied this so called palestian state. i have to aree with cingold - you do sound like a new ager - and you cannot accept a difference of opinion. bottom line - as with all new agers - your an idiot. I am still waiting for a post from you that shows thought and logic. |
| Posted by: Dan 2004-04-26 2:05:20 PM |
| #39 I still don't understand how the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem spent WWII in Berlin, receiving personal audiences with Hitler. Please explain it to me, "Anti"war. What does al-Khalifah mean? |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 2:03:26 PM |
| #38 Antiwar, I've listened to the opinions of doctors who have seen those pictures; they were quite clear that the problems shown were either in the standard run of birth defects, due to nutritional problems, or the results of errors during delivery. Your declaration that you've never seen a living person with such severe problems means nothing to me, because you've never demonstrated a level of medical competence those doctors have. And if you want to blame anyone for nutritional problems, look to the UN: 1) The sanctions were UN mandated. Not the US; the UN. You clear on that second letter? It's an 'N', not an 'S'. 2) The oil-for-food program was UN run. Instead of making sure the Iraqis got the food and medical supplies they needed, the UN pocketed cash, accepted bribes, and let Saddam build palaces and buy weapons with the money. Oh, and let's not forget that the sanctions were the peace movement's idea! |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 2:02:25 PM |
| #37 TS Where do I start?Firstly the people I look after are severely and profoundly retarded(i.e they have more brains than you)so they do not HAVE political views. Especially rightwing zionazi lets cluster bomb Iraq views. BMN thE Zionists collaborated with the Nazis and learned their lesson well and practice it today. Re propaganda do you think Alkhilafah made up those photos and if so how? Got a child to remove the top of her head??? |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 2:00:44 PM |
| #36 Antiwar, you said âEx-lib you indeed deserve to die slowly maybe from a cancer that attacks all your bones and organs you are so filled with evil venom and hatred you probably will.â An anathema on that! Unbelievable! Antiwar, from your old posts you claim to live in Australia, and favor an ecumenical/humanistic/universalistic kind of multicultural approach to human governance. How, pray tell, does saying someone deserves âto die slowly maybe from a cancerâ match that kind of supposedly benevolent philosophy. Living in Australia, you know all about the problems of islamofascism, because you hear about those excesses in Indonesia all the time. So youâre not ignorant, right? But you want to sit in judgment on all of humanity, right? Youâre not really opposed to war, right? Rather, isnât it true that your brand of liberalism is just the newest form of fascism? My guess is that you are actually a New Ager who believes (a la David Spangler and Barbara Marx Hubbard) that anyone not capable of âevolvingâ to your way of thinking should be exterminated. Am I right? |
| Posted by: cingold 2004-04-26 1:59:00 PM |
| #35 Someone is screwing with us, or Antiwar has got her greedy little hands on some speed. |
| Posted by: chinditz 2004-04-26 1:58:39 PM |
| #34 But, "Anti"war, the HOLY UN says that the Jews DO have claims on the land! Oh, what to do, what to do? And then there is the Sephardim issue...oh my! How can we explain that "Anti"war's wonderful Arabs expelled hundreds of thousands of them? And then there's the Hebron massacre, etc...but gosh that just cuts into the Arab narrative of victimhood...someone might think they were savages...it's not like they were throwing rocks at children or something, or selling the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in every bookstore in the Arab world, not that the Protocols aren't true...well maybe they are and maybe they aren't... |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 1:55:10 PM |
| #33 Mojo the Israelites are not the Israelis. The Palestinians are the descendants of Moses etc who were Jews then Christians etc etc(have said this before}The Israelis are mainly descendants of Non-semitic people from Europe who converted to Judaism.Therefore they have no claim on the land (have also said this before) |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 1:50:17 PM |
| #32 anti-war, you care for people with physical disabilities and you wish cancer on people? I hope none of your patients are people who disagree with you politically! |
| Posted by: TS (vice girl) 2004-04-26 1:49:20 PM |
| #31 Squawk - George Bush is Bad - Squawk!! Squawk - Americans are Bad - Squawk11 Squawk!! Zionists are bad - Squawk!! Squawk!! I am a parrot, that's all I know how to say - Squawk, Squawk!! |
| Posted by: Antimatters 2004-04-26 1:48:34 PM |
| #30 Of course you're a Nazi, "Anti"war--you're a Hamas-worshipping national socialist, whose only regret is that her enemies don't get cancer, and that MORE Jewish schools aren't stoned. You do know that the heroic Palestinian Arab Grand Mufti of the WWII period spent the war in Nazi Germany, right? Your al-Khalifah propaganda site is great stuff (tell us, you Jewhater, what "al-Khalifah" means; you really don't know, do you?). You obviously don't know a thing about depleted uranium (for example--it's DEPLETED). Sanctions? I thought that's what kept your friend Saddam "in a box"--that's TODAY'S Islamofascist/Baathist sympathizer talking point. You've used the pre-war one by mistake. Surely your sociology professor will be upset. Anyway, I am always amused to see your defective semiliterate rantings on this site. Keep going. It's extremely unconvincing stuff. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 1:44:13 PM |
| #29 Of course you're a Nazi, "Anti"war--you're a Hamas-worshipping national socialist, whose only regret is that her enemies don't get cancer, and that MORE Jewish schools aren't stoned. You do know that the heroic Palestinian Arab Grand Mufti of the WWII period spent the war in Nazi Germany, right? Your al-Khalifah propaganda site is great stuff (tell us, you Jewhater, what "al-Khalifah" means; you really don't know, do you?). You obviously don't know a thing about depleted uranium (for example--it's DEPLETED). Sanctions? I thought that's what kept your friend Saddam "in a box"--that's TODAY'S Islamofascist/Baathist sympathizer talking point. You've used the pre-war one by mistake. Surely your sociology professor will be upset. Anyway, I am always amused to see your defective semiliterate rantings on this site. Keep going. It's extremely unconvincing stuff. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 1:44:12 PM |
| #28 im forgot. antiwar you go to my link and you see pichur of what you like when wishing cancer. im liking you antiwar but please not do that anymore wishing cancer. |
| Posted by: muck4doo 2004-04-26 1:44:00 PM |
| #27 Robert have you seen them??? These are not ordinary birth defects. I work as a carer for people with physical disabilities (most are also severley and profoundly intellectually disabled as well) and believe me not one of them was as deformed as those babies in Iraq. Btw there were also babies deformed by nutrional deficiency (probably from sanctions)as well so you are a little bit right in a sense. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 1:43:14 PM |
| #26 Today's lesson, for AntiWar: "Pharoah sought to scare them [the Israelites] out of the land [of Israel]: but We [Allah] drowned him [Pharoah] together with all who were with him. Then We [Allah] said to the Israelites: 'Dwell in this land [the Land of Israel]. When the promise of the hereafter [End of Days] comes to be fulfilled, We [Allah] shall assemble you [the Israelites] all together [in the Land of Israel]." [Qur'an, "Night Journey," chapter 17:101-102] |
| Posted by: mojo 2004-04-26 1:35:30 PM |
| #25 As well it has photos of little Iraqi babies who are VERY severeley deformed due to depleted uranium Bullhockey. Have an honest pediatrician look at those photos, and you'll get a lecture on vitamin deficiencies during pregnancy and the normal occurences of birth defects. Anyone remember the LGF thread where that took place? It was very educational. |
| Posted by: Robert Crawford 2004-04-26 1:33:42 PM |
| #24 antiwar wishing cancer on peple isa not good debate. it not very cristian to. |
| Posted by: muck4doo 2004-04-26 1:32:22 PM |
| #23 I'M not the Nazi.The al-khilafah.info website contains photographs and stories of the Genocidal slaughter of Palestinains by Israel.As well it has photos of little Iraqi babies who are VERY severeley deformed due to depleted uranium(ring a bell?) and Iraqi's injured and killed by cluster bombs (ding dong ding dong) and as well as the effect of Sanctions.BMN YOU are the Nazi. |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 1:28:28 PM |
| #22 Boo hoo, a revolting Nazi sympathizer doesn't like me. Yeah, the problem at the kindergarten wasn't the subhumans who were throwing rocks on it, but what the children there were being taught (standard tactic of "anti-Zionist" Jew-haters like "Anti"war). What are the Arab children being taught, sweetheart? Is it on that al-khalifah website too? |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 1:19:30 PM |
| #21 TS HA HA HA HA HA(sorry but silly tarts tend to make me laugh) |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 1:17:43 PM |
| #20 I have decided to change my name there you go exlib you Nazi.I had considered it before though and made a final decision today, |
| Posted by: Antiwar-Confronter 2004-04-26 1:15:51 PM |
| #19 Anti-war, it seems you are dying slowly by a cancer that has attacked your soul, not your body. And its obvious you regard a cancer of the body as more threatning that a cancer of the soul, maybe that is your whole problem. |
| Posted by: TS (vice girl) 2004-04-26 1:13:49 PM |
| #18 [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted] |
| Posted by: Antiwar TROLL 2004-04-26 1:08:50 PM |
| #17 But denounce people who stone kindergartens? "Anti"war would never do that. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 1:04:58 PM |
| #16 Ah, so now we see the true face of "Anti"war. She's not filled with "evil venom" and "hatred," she just wishes that other people will get cancer. But really, she's antiwar. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 1:04:09 PM |
| #15 I think we should leave the painful death antiwar speaks of for savages who stone kindergartens. |
| Posted by: TS (vice girl) 2004-04-26 1:04:03 PM |
| #14 Fred, how about banning this lunatic so we don't have to read her repetitious drivel anymore; she's as bad as that Serbian jerk. |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2004-04-26 1:03:31 PM |
| #13 [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted] |
| Posted by: Antiwar TROLL 2004-04-26 1:00:05 PM |
| #12 No, "Anti"war, you have problems with non-dead Jews. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 12:57:27 PM |
| #11 Anti You are pro-war. Yes, you are. You are anti-West, pro-jihad. If you were really against violence and war, we would expect from you a real diatribe against anyone attacking a KINDERGARTEN (are you listening?) But that's okay. You're just a propaganda machine for the Islamos you defend. (You're personally involved with at least one of the "Heroes" of Islam, correct? Or is this just your own special cause--one that you are totally impassioned about--all by your little lonesome?) No worries, though. We're used to your drivel. No one takes you seriously, anyway. (P.S. Stay away from little kids, okay? Especially if you've got a rock in your hands) |
| Posted by: ex-lib 2004-04-26 12:52:25 PM |
| #10 4 year old Zionist soon became 24 year oppressors of the Pali peoples. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2004-04-26 12:47:19 PM |
| #9 [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted] |
| Posted by: Antiwar TROLL 2004-04-26 12:05:02 PM |
| #8 "Anti"war has no comment here of course. That's because no Jews were killed. |
| Posted by: BMN 2004-04-26 11:11:45 AM |
| #7 Islamic Heroes⢠at work. |
| Posted by: Frank G 2004-04-26 10:56:54 AM |
| #6 more heroric efforts on the part of the arabs/paleos...at least they did not send small kids to the school stapped with bombs... |
| Posted by: Dan 2004-04-26 10:43:41 AM |
| #5 The Israelis really need to resurrect that rock-throwing machine they contrived years back and put it into use. |
| Posted by: Bomb-a-rama 2004-04-26 10:11:58 AM |
| #4 Once again enlightening the American and European population that we are dealing with barbarians from centuries gone by. Thanks for the reminder guys. It's so hard for us to believe that we need a constant reminder to get it through our heads. |
| Posted by: B 2004-04-26 9:57:46 AM |
| #3 Last week, the jihadis killed kindergartners in Basra. This week it's Jerusalem. SSDDDPlace. |
| Posted by: Jen 2004-04-26 1:44:25 AM |
| #2 LotR - ...and the day before, and the day before that, and... |
| Posted by: PBMcL 2004-04-26 1:15:30 AM |
| #1 Another great victory for Islam. /sarcasm Damn... seems like I just wrote that yesterday. |
| Posted by: Laurence of the Rats 2004-04-26 12:14:21 AM |