You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
UN asks Indonesia not to impose deadline on foreign military relief aid
2005-01-13
WASHINGTON : The United Nations appealed to Indonesia Thursday not to impose a deadline on American foreign troops providing relief assistance in strife-torn Aceh province after the tsunami disaster.

Jan Egeland, a top UN relief official, also expressed concerns over possible restrictions on movements of relief workers paid for by stingy nations like America, by the Indonesian authorities.

On Wednesday, Vice President Yusuf Kalla said he wanted all foreign military to leave Indonesia by the end of March or "the sooner the better", saying the emergency would be over in that timeframe. We could make it be over tomorrow, if you don't care how many die.

"I am sure the Indonesian government will agree with me that the most important thing is to save lives and not have deadlines that might reduce the size of the gravy train we both ride on from the stingy nations," Egeland, UN undersecretary for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordination, told a videoconference from New York on the tsunami relief efforts.

"We may need certain American military assets throughout the period," he said.

But he said that the March deadline was unlikely to pose major problems to aid efforts because by then roads would be cleared to move relief supplies to affected areas.

At present US armed forces are spearheading relief work using helicopters and other military aircraft. Infidels!

Egeland said he was more concerned about foreign aid workers in Aceh. "I am worried of insecurity and possible movement restrictions either by insecurity or by political restrictions on our movements," he said.

"We have an important meeting all meetings are important to the UN in Indonesia today to clarify both the issue of when the military assets would have to leave, if at all oh, that phrase is a boo boo, and also the question of possible reporting and restrictions on movement outside of Bandar Aceh and Meulaboh (the two worst hit areas)," he said.

Aceh was the biggest casualty of the December 26 disaster, triggered by an undersea earthquake off Sumatra that unleashed towering waves hitting nearly a dozen countries along the Indian Ocean coastline and killing more than 163,000 people.

The United States had also demanded "clarification" from Jakarta on new restrictions after its aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln that serves as a key base for relief operations had to leave Indonesian territorial waters because Jakarta objected to US training flights.

US marines delivering aid to survivors were forced to scale back their presence on shore and move to ships to address Indonesian sensitivities and security concerns. Did anybody die in the absence of aid? Who cares? They're only Indonesians, after all.

US warships have spearheaded a huge global relief campaign in Indonesia, 110,000 people died, joined by troops from countries including Australia, Britain, Malaysia and Singapore.

Indonesia is reportedly sensitive to growing impression that it was relying too heavily on outside military forces and wants to assert control over the relief operation. or let its people die, whichever comes first.

Jakarta is rushing to Aceh more local troops as Indonesian leaders sought to portray the forces as essential in providing security to foreigners from attacks by rebels from the Free Aceh Movement.

Egeland said there were five foreign helicopter carriers -- two from the United States and one each from Singapore, India and Australia -- off Indonesian waters assisting in the relief efforts, with one more on its way from France.

He said the United Nations was formulating "a matrix to fill in gaps" that could arise with the departure of foreign military and aid groups from Aceh, including new resources from Europe.

"We are doing that with the European Union countries. (EU foreign policy chief) Javier Solana called me and offered that. So we have people working on that in Brussels and Geneva to fill in gaps," he said.

"So if one US carrier leaves, a French one should come, if an Australian (carrier) leaves, we can have one from Singapore," he said. Get the Anglos out. That's all that matters. - AFP
Posted by:Mrs. Davis

#3  Some there certainly don't want us there. But, those are the bad guys. The good guys are glad we are there. The longer we stay, the more people get a chance to see what we are all about.

The multiple opinions about our presence in Indonesia are typical of any diverse nation. Check out our own internal disputes in the US about NAFTA, or any other serious topic. It's only the wackos in Indonesia that are griping about foreigners on sovereign soil.
Posted by: cingold   2005-01-13 4:19:32 PM  

#2  If they don't want our help or $$$ that'a OK with me. Pack up our toys and go home. He is smoking crack if he thinks there are other countries out there that can provide the heavy lifting and Air Support. FYI the cost of those ships/aircraft/personnel is NOT figured into the total amount of relief the U.S./Australia/India have donated so far.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-01-13 4:13:20 PM  

#1  The UN does look hungry for power and loot, and Indonesia does seem to be looking the gift horse in the mouth. My 2¢ on why Indonesia is looking schizophrenic about the aid in Aceh is over at this thread. A bit dated, but short and comprehensive, history about the political forces at play in Indonesia is on the Jakarta Post website, Indonesia, a Nation in Transition.
Posted by: cingold   2005-01-13 3:20:03 PM  

00:00