Hi there, !
Today Fri 12/15/2006 Thu 12/14/2006 Wed 12/13/2006 Tue 12/12/2006 Mon 12/11/2006 Sun 12/10/2006 Sat 12/09/2006 Archives
Rantburg
533770 articles and 1862115 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 95 articles and 453 comments as of 3:46.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
Hamas gunnies kill three little sons of Abbas aide in Gaza
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
0 [6] 
4 00:00 Frank G [4] 
2 00:00 Old Patriot [5] 
19 00:00 gorb [5] 
2 00:00 Icerigger [3] 
4 00:00 Old Patriot [2] 
1 00:00 mhw [1] 
4 00:00 Glenmore [1] 
9 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [1] 
7 00:00 USN, Ret. [1] 
12 00:00 Old Patriot [1] 
6 00:00 rjschwarz [1] 
3 00:00 rjschwarz [9] 
2 00:00 Sneaze Shaiting3550 [2] 
6 00:00 Sneaze Shaiting3550 [1] 
13 00:00 mojo [1] 
1 00:00 pihkalbadger [1] 
1 00:00 Ptah [2] 
18 00:00 3dc [5] 
18 00:00 anymouse [2] 
8 00:00 wxjames [1] 
3 00:00 Excalibur [2] 
1 00:00 SpecOp35 [1] 
3 00:00 rjschwarz [6] 
5 00:00 RD [1] 
0 [1] 
1 00:00 JosephMendiola [2] 
2 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [2] 
21 00:00 Sgt. D.T. [1] 
0 [5] 
1 00:00 Old Patriot [5] 
2 00:00 trailing wife [6] 
0 [1] 
4 00:00 Anguper Hupomosing9418 [3] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
5 00:00 Mick Dundee [5]
4 00:00 trailing wife [1]
5 00:00 kelly [2]
18 00:00 Sneaze Shaiting3550 [2]
1 00:00 gorb [1]
3 00:00 USN, Ret. [3]
0 [3]
9 00:00 Mick Dundee [7]
9 00:00 Shipman [1]
3 00:00 anonymous5089 [1]
0 [1]
5 00:00 BA [1]
22 00:00 Frank G [3]
1 00:00 wxjames [2]
0 [2]
0 [2]
1 00:00 john [5]
0 [1]
0 [6]
3 00:00 liberalhawk [9]
0 [1]
1 00:00 Frank G [9]
0 [1]
1 00:00 Chuck Simmins [1]
2 00:00 Shipman [5]
Page 3: Non-WoT
1 00:00 Grunter [6]
2 00:00 trailing wife [5]
1 00:00 Sock Puppet of Doom [1]
7 00:00 DMFD [1]
1 00:00 tu3031 [2]
4 00:00 RD [1]
4 00:00 DMFD [1]
1 00:00 JosephMendiola [1]
17 00:00 Grunter [3]
27 00:00 Brett [2]
15 00:00 anonymous2u [1]
2 00:00 JosephMendiola [1]
9 00:00 Jackal [1]
1 00:00 Quana [6]
1 00:00 Icerigger [2]
Page 4: Opinion
0 [5]
3 00:00 .com [6]
8 00:00 Sneaze Shaiting3550 [1]
7 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [4]
1 00:00 john [8]
1 00:00 mojo [2]
3 00:00 DarthVader [1]
13 00:00 Grunter [3]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
0 [7]
1 00:00 Hooterboy [3]
6 00:00 Frank G [5]
1 00:00 anonymous5089 [4]
2 00:00 chaika [3]
4 00:00 Silentbrick [3]
3 00:00 JDB [2]
4 00:00 tu3031 [2]
2 00:00 xbalanke [1]
5 00:00 tu3031 [1]
8 00:00 Fred [2]
6 00:00 Laurence of the Rats [7]
6 00:00 CrazyFool [1]
Afghanistan
A-Stan: Hek Takes Credit For Democraps Win
Extra Read All About It!
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) - The leader of the Hezb-e-Islami militant group also touts the Republican Party defeat in last month's U.S. midterm elections as a victory for militants fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Hezb-e-Islami jr militants Murtha, Pelosi, Reid...
"It seems that every bullet that mujahedeen had fired toward the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan has turned into a vote against Bush," Hekmatyar said in the undated video statement received by Associated Press Television in Pakistan.
DNC *hearts* Hek..
"There is no doubt that is a great victory and success for Afghan and Iraqi mujahedeen," he said. "I am convinced that the fate Soviet Union faced is awaiting America as well."
and your mama is a smelly old goat Hek
The bespectacled and bearded Hekmatyar, who wore a neat black turban, speaks in an undisclosed location in front of a rattan backdrop. He is wrapped in a light grey shawl.
AP stringer FISNIK ABRASHI fishing for sum work at GQ
It was not clear where or when the three-minute video was made. But the reference to the mid-term elections, when the Republican Party of U.S. President George W. Bush lost control of the U.S. Senate and Congress to the Democrats, indicated it was recorded after Nov. 7.
no Shiite
Hezb-e-Islami is active in eastern Afghanistan along the Pakistan border where U.S. forces are deployed. Western security officials suspect Hekmatyar is hiding in the border area. This year has seen an escalation in the insurgency led by the former ruling Taliban.
lets thank Perv again shall we
"Very soon we will see that, God willing, American troops will leave Afghanistan and Iraq with their heads bowed down," Hekmatyar said in the video.
Yep, sure as shit if the DemoCraps have their way.
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 03:47 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  NEWSMAX > IRAN will have nukes by 2008.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 4:44 Comments || Top||

#2  RD the link doesn't work.
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 7:17 Comments || Top||

#3  "It seems that every bullet that mujahedeen had fired toward the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan has turned into a vote against Bush," Hekmatyar said.

Sad commentary on the American people that he is probably correct.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/12/2006 8:17 Comments || Top||

#4  Yep Icerigger CNEWS expired it.

:-)
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 11:36 Comments || Top||

#5  If Hek is sharing a box seat with Jimmah Carter and Mikey Moore at the '08 Democratic National Convention, we'll know he was right.
Posted by: Dreadnought || 12/12/2006 14:07 Comments || Top||

#6  I'm amazed we haven't whacked this guy yet. As a message if not just to help Afghanistan move forward.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 12/12/2006 17:30 Comments || Top||


NATO allies need to ‘get real' about Taliban threat, Britain says
Ottawa — Britain's Foreign Office minister says reluctant NATO allies need to “get real” about the threat posed by a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan. Kim Howells told a diplomatic audience at Canada's Foreign Affairs building in Ottawa that Britons are just as frustrated as Canadians about bearing the brunt of heavy fighting in the country's south.

German, Italian, French and Spanish forces patrol relatively quiet sectors and have refused to allow their troops to engage in combat. At the NATO summit two weeks ago, those countries agreed to loosen restrictions and promised to help Canadian, British, Dutch and American forces battling the Taliban, but only in emergencies.

Mr. Howells says it seems that there are two classes of NATO troops — those who are allowed to die in order to protect freedom and other soldiers who are not allowed to do so. Without naming the countries, Mr. Howells says some of the allies are kidding themselves if they believe that they shouldn't get involved just because they haven't been targeted for a major terrorist attack.
So the unnamed reporter names the names. Lol.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 02:50 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  ASIA TIMES > "NEW JERUSALEM" Book Review by Spengler > Future Christians, nay the future destiny of Christianity itself as a FAITH, will be from the "GLOBAL SOUTH" = SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE [Africans, Browns, Asians], White Euros per se are soon-to-be surreal, "former-" or "ex-
Christians", the latter lucky iff in name only.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 3:29 Comments || Top||

#2  Britain's Foreign Office minister says reluctant NATO allies need to “get real” about the threat posed by a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan.

Why when it is the Foreign Ministry and/or State Department which ignores that reality that the Taliban have secure bases in Pakland? Cause that forces one to acknowledge that the solution is to take the fight to the enemy in Pakland which you don't want because it is soooo messy. Look in the mirror dude.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 12/12/2006 9:19 Comments || Top||

#3  Procopius: Point taken. As far as I am concerned the tribal lands on the frontier should be sterilized. That said, there is never a day when it is inappropriate to call the French cowards.
Posted by: Excalibur || 12/12/2006 10:26 Comments || Top||

#4  Maybe when the UK gets serious on the home frontIRT terrorists, somebody might just listen. Till then, however.......
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 12/12/2006 14:17 Comments || Top||

#5  If they want to get real, they need to cross the border into North West Pakistan
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087 || 12/12/2006 15:20 Comments || Top||

#6  Yah, get real. Plant mines on the border with Pakistan.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550 || 12/12/2006 21:36 Comments || Top||


Taliban says want no part of tribal peace talks
The Taliban on Monday backed away from comments they might join tribal councils aimed at ending growing violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Senior spokesman Sayed Tayeb Agha said the rebels would never join such talks as long as foreign soldiers remained in Afghanistan.
"Such jirgas (councils) are aimed at protecting American interests only. Such jirgas are neither independent nor do they take independent decisions," he told Reuters from Quetta a secret location.
"Such jirgas (councils) are aimed at protecting American interests only. Such jirgas are neither independent nor do they take independent decisions," he told Reuters from Quetta a secret location. "The Taliban will not take part in any jirga in the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan because such jirgas or meetings have no significance."

There are about 40,000 foreign troops in the country under separate NATO and U.S. commands. But while Afghanistan and Pakistan agree jirgas should be held, they have so far failed to agree on when, how or who should be included. Kabul wants all Afghan tribes involved. Islamabad wants the councils restricted to the border tribes -- essentially the Pashtuns from which the Taliban draws its support. Government and political leaders in both countries say at least moderate elements of the resurgent Taliban must be included in any talks to end the fighting.

A Taliban spokesman said on Sunday the group might join the jirga talks if asked, but Agha -- a more senior official closer to the group's leader -- said that did not reflect the militants' position. Pakistani Foreign Minister Khursheed Mehmood Kasuri met officials in Kabul on the jirgas last week but no agreement was reached.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  “…say at least moderate elements of the resurgent Taliban must be included in any talks to end the fighting.”

Moderate Taliban? Must be the ones that don’t bugger the boys without chin whiskers.
(Not publicly anyway)
Posted by: DepotGuy || 12/12/2006 11:59 Comments || Top||

#2  The moderate Taliban accept their pay in bank drafts, the radicals insist on being paid in cold, hard cash. That's the difference.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/12/2006 17:04 Comments || Top||


Taliban ban boys in private quarters
The Taliban have issued a list of 30 rules for new recruits, containing some curious restrictions, according to a report in British newspaper the Guardian. Rule 19 declares, “mujahideen are not allowed to take young boys with no facial hair on to the battlefield or into their private quarters.”
"Jihad's no place for kiddies! Bone 'em at home!"
Rule 18 urges mujahideen to quit smoking. Other rules instruct Taliban fighters to be on their best behaviour with civilians, lest they are government employees, who must be treated without mercy and killed. Schools that ignore warnings to close must be burned, while the teachers working there must first be warned, then beaten, and if they continue to teach, to be killed. The code, agreed by the Taliban shura during the recent Eid holidays, has been circulated to field commanders across Afghanistan and northern Pakistan.
Posted by: Fred & john || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This was in a Rantburg posting yesterday that was removed.
Posted by: Snomp Shotch9850 || 12/12/2006 1:17 Comments || Top||

#2  Sheesh.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 1:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Okay, MOUD = OSAMA = WHITNEY, you and me have to have a little talk. How can Remote Viewer ED DAMES of C2CAM find your 12th Imam if your Burqua Boyz keep dev rules like these Heeeeeeeellllllloooooooooo, MAGI FINDING JESUS IN A MANGER. LETS GET A GRIP, PEOPLE, DON'T LET ME SEND MADONNA + MARIAH, ETC. DOWN THERE TO CATFIGHT WITH WHITNEY. Can't send the boys becuz, well you know, WORLD SERIES + SUPERBOWL + SPORTS + SNACKS + SNOW............@, "MALE LIONS YAWNING" = MAN SHOW, THINGYS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 2:23 Comments || Top||

#4  Killing government employees, closing schools, killing teachers,...I'm having a flashback to the '70s!

Are we in Cambodia?
http://www.time.com/time/daily/polpot/2.html
Posted by: Skidmark || 12/12/2006 6:46 Comments || Top||

#5  I saw this crap over there in 1989. When a young boy came into camp the men would surround him. Sick.
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 7:11 Comments || Top||

#6  Rantburgers were able to read the following article during much of yesterday. Then the article disappeared during the final part of the day.
===============

The Taliban leadership has issued its own version of the Constitution of Afghanistan and also a Code of Conduct for its Field Commanders and fighters. .... The Constitution, written in Pashtu and Dari, the two dominant languages in Afghanistan, proclaims Afghanistan as "a free, independent, united and inseparable country whose official name is the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan."The document circulated among Taliban cadres has the emblem of the 'Emirate of Afghanistan' which they had under the previous Taliban Government (1996-2001). ....

The Taliban Constitution says that the "Islamic Emirate's supreme leader will be called 'Amirul Momneen' and has to be a 'knowledgeable' Afghan national. It says that all laws of the country will have to be brought in conformity with the "Islamic Shariah." ....

The 66-page document declares that the basic law will be implemented after the Taliban wrests control of Afghanistan from the US-backed Afghan Government and throws out the foreign Kafirs (infidels). The underground Taliban leaders propose to distribute copies of the Constitution among the Islamic countries and organizations and other foreign elements to apprise them as to how the resurgent Taliban wanted to administer the affairs of the country after returning to power.

The Taliban leadership ... has issued a strict Code of Conduct for their field commanders and the rank and file. The 30-point code, which is in the shape of a handbook, has been circulated among the guerrillas, and asks them to invite all Afghans to join the fight against American-led forces and the corrupt Kabul Government.

Giving top priority to recruitment, Rule 1 says that all 'Taliban commanders will recruit a large number of Afghans, converting them to the true Islam.'

Rule 5 says that all new recruits will be protected and any Taliban who kills a new recruit will forfeit his own protection and 'will be punished according to the Islamic law.'

Rule 7 enjoins, "foreign kafirs taken prisoners must not be exchanged for other prisoners or for money."

Highlighting the alleged corruption under the Karzai Government, Rule 9 prohibits the Taliban from "the use of Jihad equipment or property for personal ends."

Rule 10 holds each member of the Taliban, 'accountable to his superiors in matters of money spending and equipment usage."

Rule 24 authorizes the field commanders and group leaders to punish the teachers imparting education which does not conforms to the Islamic norms. It "forbids a teacher from working under the 'puppet Karzai regime' because it strengthens the system of the Kafirs."

Rule 25 further directs, "if a teacher ignores a warning to give up his job, he must be beaten up' and if he still persists to instruct contrary to the principles of Islam, the District Commander or the Group Leader must kill him."

It also directs the cadres to remove all religious texts from the school building before putting it to fire. More than 500 schools have so far been burnt by the Taliban in the southern provinces of Afghanistan.

Apart from prohibiting cigarette smoking, it also prohibits allowing murderers from joining the cadres. To stem the sexual abuse of children, especially in some of the madrassas that feed the recruitment needs of Taliban, one of the rules says, "Taliban are not allowed to take young boys with no facial hair on to the battlefield or into their private quarters." ....

Rule 30 says that "only the highest levels of the Taliban can approve the work for the NGOs."

The code is said to have been approved by the Taliban Shura (Council) at a secret meeting in October, somewhere in Pakistan's Balochistan province from where most of their leaders are operating. Their Supreme Leader, Mullah Mohammad Omar, is reported to have approved the code before its issue. ....
Posted by: Snomp Shotch9850 || 12/12/2006 7:23 Comments || Top||

#7  Snomp Shotch9850, I recall that particular article was first posted several days ago. If it didn't get any comments yesterday, no doubt Fred or one of the moderators removed it to save a bit of bandwidth. The moderators do their thing as their schedules and the local time zones allow, it seems, whereas articles in the hopper after something like 9 pm Eastern Time magically appear when the clock turns over. On the other hand, articles posted late in the day, or deemed of particular interest, are sometimes rolled over to the next day. I've no idea what the exact criteria are, and since this is Fred's own site, quite probably they are variable. (And there's no point in arguing with him, as he keeps queer hours.)
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 8:53 Comments || Top||

#8  Why is this article posted today if we are saving bandwidth?
Posted by: Thineth Grusing1600 || 12/12/2006 9:01 Comments || Top||

#9  Because Fred wanted to. He's paying for this site out of his own pocket, no doubt giving up dates with Mrs. Pruitt to pay for it. There's a Paypal button at the top righthand corner of the page that you can hit to help him out, should you feel so moved.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 9:14 Comments || Top||

#10  Why is this article posted today if we are saving bandwidth?

Everyone wants to be Editor...
Posted by: Pappy || 12/12/2006 10:02 Comments || Top||

#11  I apologize, Thineth Grusing1600, you didn't deserve a snippy answer. I've no idea why, as I'm neither Fred nor a moderator. If you go here, Fred and the moderators explain the latest version of the basic rules of what to post and how to tighten up articles. It's linked at the top of the article posting page, too, labelled Before you post, read this! in great big letters.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 10:12 Comments || Top||

#12  How about goats?
Posted by: Sleaper Thraviter2776 || 12/12/2006 10:33 Comments || Top||

#13  Goats are halal.. blessed by Allah and provided for the companionship of the faithful

Posted by: john || 12/12/2006 12:21 Comments || Top||

#14  So they're going the gang bang route?
Posted by: tu3031 || 12/12/2006 12:33 Comments || Top||

#15  The Taliban rulebook's been posted at least a half dozen times, by my recollection, which is why several duplicate posts have been deleted or stopped in the holding tank.

I didn't see any of them drawing attention to Rule 19, which is why this one was kept.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 12:39 Comments || Top||

#16  it's a cultural thingy..
Iraqi Village People
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 13:49 Comments || Top||

#17  It's SIGNIFICANT that they have to issue a rule to combat the sexual abuse of boys. And it's probably not because they care about the boys. They're just worried that it's so widespread the MSM and liberal supporters will find out, and THEN WHAT? This is to protect themselves, and they've issued nothing that says it's immoral, and BTW, what is the punishment for forcing boys to be personal sex slaves of these sleazy, greazy ick-men? The "30 rules" are merely suggestions for show.

And we wonder why there are so many angry young Arab men.
Posted by: ex-lib || 12/12/2006 16:15 Comments || Top||

#18  I removed it yesterday because it was a duplicate.

I would have removed it today had I found it before it had 17 comments.

I generally remove duplicates without further notice (since the notice itself would generate a place-holder post). If you post an article that then gets removed, it's very likely that it was a duplicate. It happens to me sometimes; with 100 articles a day it's easy to miss something and post a duplicate.

So that's what happened. Sorry. AoS.
Posted by: Steve White || 12/12/2006 17:25 Comments || Top||

#19  (And there's no point in arguing with him, as he keeps queer hours.)

Are you telling me queers have their own time zone ? What next ?
Posted by: wxjames || 12/12/2006 18:01 Comments || Top||

#20  Can they take a goat into their private quarters if they shaved the goat's facial hair? Just asking.
Posted by: Sgt. D.T. || 12/12/2006 19:08 Comments || Top||

#21  Can they take a goat into their private quarters if they shaved the goat's facial hair? Just asking.
Posted by: Sgt. D.T. || 12/12/2006 19:08 Comments || Top||


Arabia
Duh: How Gulf states could start new nuclear race
alG. Everbody's bad. Except the Noble Savages, of course. They're purdy cute. Can we go back to the trees, now?
A weekend decision by the six-member Gulf Cooperation Council to launch an innocent-sounding joint nuclear energy development project is the clearest signal yet that Iran's nuclear programmes, whether sinister or not, could hasten the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction across the Middle East.

But the activities of acknowledged nuclear weapons states such as the US, Russia and Britain, and deepening frustrations among key non-nuclear, non-aligned players such as Indonesia and Argentina, are also stoking worries that the UN's cornerstone non-proliferation treaty (NPT) is not long for this life.

The Gulf countries - Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the UAE - made clear that, like Iran, they want nuclear know-how for solely "peace purposes". And it is not the first time the idea of an Arab bomb has come up. Egypt, Algeria, Morocco and Saudi Arabia have already declared an intention to develop civilian nuclear energy.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 03:39 || Comments || Link || [9 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Low-yield nuclear weaponry" > And now you know, GENERAL(S), why long ago I said to keep and upgrade the designs of the DAVY CROCKETTS, etc.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 4:00 Comments || Top||

#2  I don't think the UN has much to do with this. The non-Iranian Gulf states see the handwriting on the wall, they know the US won't stop Iran's nukes, so they are trying to protect themselves. What would you do if you were running one of these states & had a few billion in the bank?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/12/2006 17:07 Comments || Top||

#3  The US should float a memo about helping Chechyna with their nuclear power program and see if it helps straighten the Russian thinking abit.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 12/12/2006 17:28 Comments || Top||


Saudi clerics seek help for Iraqi Sunnis
A group of prominent Saudi clerics have called on Sunni Muslims around the world to mobilise against Shiites in Iraq, although a statement they issued fell short of calling for a jihad, or holy war. The statement appearing on Saudi Islamist Web sites on Monday said Sunni Muslims were being murdered and marginalised by Shiites, backed by Iran, and the US-led forces.

Saudi Arabia, a bastion of Sunni Islam, backs the Shiite-dominated government of Nuri al-Maliki largely because it fears that sectarian violence between Sunnis and Shiites could lead to the break-up of its northern neighbour and spill over its borders. “We direct this message to all concerned about Shiites in the world: the murder, torture and displacement of Sunnis ... is an outrage. We don’t think you would accept to be treated like this,” said the statement, dated Dec 7. “Muslims must stand directly with our Sunni brothers in Iraq and support them by all appropriate, well-studied means ... Muslims generally should be made aware of the danger of the Shiites. Clerics and intellectuals should not stand hands folded over what’s happening to their Sunni brothers in Iraq; all occasions should be used to expose the Shiites’ practices ... What has been taken by force can only be got back by force.”

The statement was signed by 38 clerics and Islamic preachers, including Abdel-Rahman al-Barrak, Safar al-Hawali and Nasser al-Omar, leading figures of Saudi Arabia’s hardline school of Sunni Islam known as Wahhabism. Many Saudi clerics of the austere Wahhabi school of Sunni Islam dismiss Shiites as virtual heretics and the kingdom’s Shiites have long complained about second class treatment. Populist preachers who regularly appear on Saudi state television did not sign the document, which repeated fears expressed by Jordan’s King Abdullah of a “Shiite crescent” stretching across the Middle East, as Iran allies with Shiites in the Arab world after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  A group of prominent Saudi clerics have called on Sunni Muslims around the world to mobilise against Shiites in Iraq

A general Sunni Shia war would be nice.
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/12/2006 0:43 Comments || Top||

#2  Ah, c'mon, huff & puff a little more and spit out a worldwide fatwa on Shiits. Kill 'em where you find 'em.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/12/2006 1:13 Comments || Top||

#3  “We direct this message to all concerned about Shiites in the world: the murder, torture and displacement of Sunnis ... is an outrage. We don’t think you would accept to be treated like this,”

Unless, of course, it was at the hands of that Sunni dictator we were propping up for thirty years.

Seriously though: Red on red! Bring. It. On.
Posted by: Excalibur || 12/12/2006 10:30 Comments || Top||

#4  All Iraqi Sunnis should have the right of return to their religious homeland.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/12/2006 17:14 Comments || Top||


Britain
Britain considering new counter-terror department
LONDON - British Prime Minister Tony Blair is considering proposals that would see the creation of a new government department charged with fighting terrorism, The Times reported on Wednesday. According to the daily, Home Secretary (interior minister) John Reid submitted the option of creating a new department as part of a review of Britain’s counter-terror strategy.
MI7?
The review was sent to the prime minister in the past few days, and Blair will apparently study it over Christmas as the government formulates new anti-terror legislation.

Reid’s review ruled out a merger of Britain’s domestic intelligence service, MI5, with its foreign intelligence service, MI6, though he has an “open mind” on the creation of a new department to combat terror. Another option included in the review, The Times said, was much greater co-ordination between existing departments, the intelligence services, and the police when fighting terror.
Posted by: Steve White || 12/12/2006 23:24 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under:


YJCMTSU: British troops to get 'crime' compensation
LONDON(istan) -- Hundreds of British troops wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan are to be awarded millions of dollars in compensation after the government ruled that they are victims of crime, not war.
Huh?
Forty injured servicemen are to receive payments of up to almost $1 million each in a series of test cases. This is expected to lead to claims from hundreds more of the estimated 1,000 troops injured in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001.

Payments will be made on a sliding scale of about $2,000 for a small facial scar to $1 million for the loss of a limb.

Sources said the ruling was reached after government attorneys raised fears that the Defense Ministry could be subject to a legal challenge by troops claiming that they were victims of crime because they were wounded in Iraq after the end of "at war" hostilities in May 2003.
I can't... words just... nevermind.
All those injured fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, but who have remained in the army, could be entitled to lodge claims under the new plan. Those who are medically discharged will receive war pensions, as is already the case.

This plan is similar to that run by the Home Office, the British interior ministry, which makes payments to the victims of crimes such as muggings, rape, burglary and robbery. Troops will be informed officially of the new policy in the next few weeks and the first payments will be made in early spring.

Until now, the Defense Ministry has paid criminal compensation only for incidents in which troops were injured in "civilian situations" such as a fight in a nightclub while off duty.

Those injured in Northern Ireland during the sectarian violence were also eligible for such compensation because it was deemed that the terrorists attacking them were criminals and not enemy combatants in a conventional war.

The new ruling and expansion of compensation to the Iraq and Afghan conflicts means insurgents or terrorists carrying out surprise attacks and sabotage missions are regarded as criminals and not enemy troops. It is thought that the only circumstances in which troops injured in Iraq and Afghanistan would not be eligible for criminal compensation is when they were involved in prearranged, offensive operations directly targeting insurgents.

Most casualties in Iraq have received their wounds through car bombings, sniping and rocket attacks -- circumstances not dissimilar to most attacks sustained in Ulster. Defense sources say the ruling reflects the changing nature of the conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. Although both theaters of conflict are described frequently as war zones, in strict legal terms British troops are not at war.

The government decision for compensation is a response to demands from legislators, military chiefs and the public to provide the armed forces with better pay, accommodation and medical care.
Geebus.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 04:27 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I don't quite follow the semantics of war vs. crime, but I cannot disagree with the idea of compensating the injured soldiers, and these amounts do not seem unreasonable, nor unaffordable as long as the war level stays low.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/12/2006 8:23 Comments || Top||

#2  A Brit poster is going to have to enlighten us on the British compensation system. In the US, the Veterans Administration has extensive hospital networks set up for continued care specifically of service related wounds and injuries, with those having war related injuries receiving priority, not part of a general national health service. The VA has programs for adjustments to include things like no charge vehicles for those who require special adaptations to operate. The VA pays life long tax free compensation for service related injuries. Or for the British, is everything sort of thrown into the general social services support offices?
Posted by: Procopius2k || 12/12/2006 9:27 Comments || Top||

#3  "Although both theaters of conflict are described frequently as war zones, in strict legal terms British troops are not at war."

Why do I get the mental picture of some Jihadist MoFo reading the above quote and laughing so hard his turban falls off?
Posted by: DepotGuy || 12/12/2006 10:44 Comments || Top||

#4  P2K: A slight correction to your comment re: VA disability pay. IN the case of retired military folks that have some level of VA-determined eligibility, the amount you receive from the VA is DEDUCTED from your retired pay and sent to you via the VA. What it amounts to is that the VA paid portion is tax-free. Congress has resisted for many years, any attempts to pay VA disability separate from your retired pay. A few years ago, I determined my 30% disability was worth $46 for the year (tax savings).
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 12/12/2006 14:24 Comments || Top||

#5  I've read some comments in the UK MSM about how much better US vets are treated than UK vets. This may be a way around the discrepancy. Need to hear from a UK local about this.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/12/2006 17:09 Comments || Top||

#6  One of the things the GOP congress managed to pass was the elimination of the "dual-compensation" clause for VA disability payments. Beginning in 2004, and increasing during the next ten years, the amount paid to VA disabled veterans will gradually be freed from the one-to-one deduction from retired pay. The last change will be in 2013, after which no disability pay will be offset from retirees military pay. I've seen my military take-home retirement almost double in the last three years as these rules have been implemented. I'm currently at 70% disabled.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 12/12/2006 17:14 Comments || Top||

#7  OP: Thanks for the update, however I thought that only those @ 50% and ^ would receive this; those of us below that line were still in the old methodology. Of course, I won't see any increase, as Mrs. Ret will take it as her compensation for having to put up with me :)
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 12/12/2006 17:58 Comments || Top||


Inquest Results: UK Soldier killed three days after returning armour
A British soldier in Iraq was shot dead by "friendly fire" three days after he had been ordered to hand back life-saving body armour, an inquest was told yesterday. Sgt Steven Roberts, 33, was killed at a checkpoint outside the town of Az Zubayr in 2003. An Army Board of Inquiry report found that if he had not given up his enhanced body armour the bullet would not have killed him.

Yesterday's inquest heard that the sergeant and other soldiers in his tank group had accepted the body armour order because they had been told "guys on the ground needed it more than us".

The death of Sgt Roberts, of 2 Royal Tank Regiment, in such circumstances led to an outcry and calls for Geoff Hoon, the defence secretary at the time, to be sacked. Samantha Roberts, the dead man's widow, campaigned to find out the truth about his death and called for an apology from Mr Hoon for the "unfillable void" it left in her life. Before yesterday's hearing in Oxford, she said: "I'm just going to go with an open mind and see what happens."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 02:34 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This happened around three years ago when there was a dearth of body armour amongst british troops thankfully things are different now. The defence secretary was replaced shortly after.
Posted by: pihkalbadger || 12/12/2006 12:58 Comments || Top||


Down Under
Ozzies: New citizens face test on 200 questions
Migrants seeking citizenship will need a grasp of up to 200 questions about Australia under the proposed new nationality test - and to answer them in English.

But the Liberal MP Petro Georgiou signalled last night that he would oppose the Government's legislation. "I'm concerned that the tightening of the requirements will create unreasonable barriers to the acquisition of citizenship and that it will prevent people who would make a wonderful contribution to Australia from becoming citizens," he said.

The Prime Minister rushed out the broad details of the test yesterday in a move to wrest the spotlight from the new Opposition Leader, Kevin Rudd. The test will require answers to about 30 multiple-choice questions selected randomly from a secret list of 200 questions.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 02:41 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  They should add some cricket questions.
Posted by: phil_b || 12/12/2006 2:56 Comments || Top||

#2  I'd rather they didnt phil_b ..

Bad enough being teased by my Antipodean friends over Englands dismal cricket as it is .. When I finally emigrate , I dont want a bloody quiz asking me questions to further my cricketing humiliation..
Posted by: MacNails || 12/12/2006 5:04 Comments || Top||

#3  McNails, my personal opinion is just make sure you do emigrate (preferrably to Perth).
Posted by: phil_b || 12/12/2006 5:48 Comments || Top||

#4  Repeat question two hundred times for Brits...

Q:Who is the greatest cricket team in the world?

A: Australia

(*sigh*)
Posted by: Howard UK || 12/12/2006 7:52 Comments || Top||

#5  Leg before wicket is hard!
Posted by: Commonweath Barbie || 12/12/2006 8:39 Comments || Top||

#6  Anyone could explain the rules of that d... cricket? I am still recoverinbg from the shock after seeing England leads India 150 to 0 but she is losing. And what are those things named wickets?

At least baseball looks logic to me.
Posted by: JFM || 12/12/2006 10:07 Comments || Top||

#7  Q 115 Explain and critique the rationale behind the front foot rule...
Posted by: Grunter || 12/12/2006 10:10 Comments || Top||

#8  to put it simply ....

You have 2 sides,
one out in the field and one in.
Each man that's in the side that's in goes out,
and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in,
until he's out.
When they are all out,
the side that's out comes in,
and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in out.
Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When both sides have been in and out,
including the not outs, that's the end of the game.
Posted by: MacNails || 12/12/2006 10:58 Comments || Top||

#9  LOL!
Posted by: jn1 || 12/12/2006 12:19 Comments || Top||

#10  Oh suuure MacNails, thanks for clearing thatr mystery up!

Bawaawawawawawa
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 12:34 Comments || Top||

#11  Q: What was the name of the walleyed guy in Men at Work?
Posted by: tu3031 || 12/12/2006 12:36 Comments || Top||

#12  "Name the three varieties of bush meat."

I remember a certain Aussie Captain that used to pull that one on every new guy at the 12th RITS...
Posted by: Old Patriot || 12/12/2006 17:21 Comments || Top||

#13  How many cans of beer can you drink without puking?
Posted by: mojo || 12/12/2006 17:38 Comments || Top||


Europe
The Threat of Lawful Islamism and the Need to Fight It
Posted by: Unath Spugum7781 || 12/12/2006 10:52 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Good find & post Unath. The post leads / links to instructive and disturbing information.
Posted by: Mark Z || 12/12/2006 14:29 Comments || Top||

#2  Great find! Islamanazis on parade. I'm still choking over the Norwegians removing pigs from children's stories.
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 17:46 Comments || Top||


Berlin To Stage Controversial Opera
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/12/2006 09:07 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Good. According to the article, the outcry caused them to grow a backbone -- this is that opera staged with the severed heads of Jesus and Mohammed that was cancelled in September out of fear that Muslims might take offense... violently. It opens in a week, and a goodly number of the ruling Conservatives will be sitting in the audience. When the manager called the police to ask what they should do if a bomb threat were called in, he was told to ask the caller what it looked like and where it was placed.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 9:34 Comments || Top||

#2  This has an artificial, staged feel to it. I've only seen Idomeneo performed live once, and I don't recall seeing anyone's heads stacked up, much less Mohammad's.

Idomeneo was the king of Crete, returning victorious from the Trojan war -- which predated Mo by several years. I guess this is one of the hazards of turning a perfectly good opera into "edgy performance art."

There are lots of valid reasons to fight with Islamists. This isn't one of them.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 13:00 Comments || Top||

#3  They are German theater people. They see little point in doing something unless it can be turned into edgy performance art, with which they can damn the audience for being bourgeous Philistines... cubed for the Berlin theatricalistas, who used to get subsidized just for living on the edge of the abyss. Interesting how this brought to the attention of the theater-going class exactly how dangerous keeping pet Muslim radicals is.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 14:17 Comments || Top||

#4  It is not exactly fighting with Islamists - more like daring them to fight with you. Sort of like the 'Piss Christ' exhibit of 'art' some years back in the US. Of no particular importance one way or another, except if it identifies some specific enemies.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/12/2006 19:13 Comments || Top||


Paris police chief warns of terror threat
The Paris police chief said Monday that the threat of a terror attack on the French capital remains high, requiring continued intelligence and surveillance efforts. Pierre Mutz, speaking at a city council meeting considering the police budget for 2007, did not name any specific new dangers, but said "The threat remains high."

The government ordered extra military patrols on public transport before the Christmas and New Year's holidays, when visitors and tourists pack Paris. "What we have seen in the past in Paris, ... and what has happened to our neighbors recently, show how large metropolitan areas and their public transport systems are sensitive to attacks," Mutz said.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Tis sorrows me not.
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/12/2006 0:52 Comments || Top||

#2  Threat from.......USA? Evangelists? Israel? The Bushitler crime family?
Posted by: Brett || 12/12/2006 10:24 Comments || Top||

#3  How would they tell the difference from their ongoing suburban intifada?
Posted by: Excalibur || 12/12/2006 12:23 Comments || Top||


Fifth Column
Suspicion about imams grows as terror links pile up
Our local MSM Keith Ellison supporting freakshow of a newspaper dared print this. Just about fainted. Little Green Footballs readers also picked it up.

The six imams who’ve retained CAIR as legal counsel in a possible suit against US Airways are the subject of Katherine Kersten’s piece for the normally idiotarian Minneapolis Star Tribune: Suspicion about imams grows as terror links pile up.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the imams’ legal representative, is an organization that “we know has ties to terrorism,” Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said in 2003. And the Muslim American Society, which is also supporting the imams? It’s the American arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the Chicago Tribune, which called it “the world’s most influential Islamic fundamentalist group.”

How about Omar Shahin, the imams’ spokesman and also president of the North American Imams Federation? He is a native of Jordan, who says he became a U.S. citizen in 2003. From 2000 to 2003, Shahin served as president of Islamic Center of Tucson (ICT), that city’s largest mosque.

The ICT is well known. The mosque has “an extensive history of terror links,” according to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, who testified about terrorist financing before the Senate Banking Committee in July 2005.

The Washington Post described these links in a 2002 article. “Tucson was one of the first points of contact in the United States for the jihadist group that evolved into al Qaeda,” the Post reported. And the ICT? It held “basically the first cell of al Qaeda in the United States; that is where it all started,” said Rita Katz, a terrorism expert quoted by the Post.

Now what would be interesting is to see a lawer with balls from US Airways bring up these terrorist links.
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 06:38 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Went around with one of the original reporters, aka slowpitch softball pitchers, about this.
What about the seatbelt extenders?
He said he often requests what he doesn't need, like more peanuts or a pillow.
Jeez.
Problem with journos like him is that they think people believe them.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey || 12/12/2006 9:11 Comments || Top||

#2  Here's hoping US Airways stands firm against this blatant attempt to extort money from the infidel.

CAIR would like to see a settlement out of court. If I were advising US Airways I'd want the case in court in order to be able to take depositions of the imams under oath and on record.
Posted by: Mark Z || 12/12/2006 9:20 Comments || Top||

#3  I flew US Airways to/from OKC, thru Phoenix, last week and I felt safer knowing mooslims might boycott them. That should be their new motto: "terror-imam free since...". Think their sales wouldn't increase?
Posted by: Frank G || 12/12/2006 9:50 Comments || Top||

#4  This is nothing but organized harrassment by Muzzie central. They think a long campaign of this plus frivolous law suits will cause everyone to drop their guard. I think it will produce the opposite and make everyone realize what a pestilence they are.

I think citizen arrests for disturbing the peace ought to be carried out. In the process, a real blanket party atmosphere ought to prevail. After more than their fair share of beatings, maybe they'd give it up.
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/12/2006 10:51 Comments || Top||

#5  slightly off topic geographically, but on global point..

..Once we found the two mosques the outer-cordon circled the objectives. For some reason, most of the leaders of the enemy are mullahs and they usually live near mosques. That isn’t profiling, that is a fact.

Betsy Barks Again: scroll...
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 12:12 Comments || Top||

#6  "Blanket party" What a wonderful blast from the past. I think the collective BS level in the US is getting close to that point.
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 12/12/2006 14:10 Comments || Top||

#7  While it might be difficult to prove, US Airways should consider filing a countersuit against the imams for intentionally disrupting a flight. Bill them for the jet's idle time, delays and extra crew pay and so on.

The fact that they seated themselves in the 9-11 configuration (with at least one individual purposefully placing himself in first class without such ticketing), should serve as strong evidence that were seeking to intentionally interfere with the flight. The lawsuit could roll up into many tens of thousands of dollars rather quickly including attorney's fees. Nothing like a costly settlement to shut these maggots up.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/12/2006 16:08 Comments || Top||

#8  In the process, a real blanket party atmosphere ought to prevail.

Yep, a small hand-towel and a bar of soap in the old carry-on luggage. Very effecive.

Posted by: Mick Dundee || 12/12/2006 16:25 Comments || Top||

#9  If the imams sue, US Airlines should subpoena every Muslim these "imams" ever knew, down to their dental and tax records.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 12/12/2006 16:58 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
Saudi Ambassador aburlptly resigns, leaves U.S.: repor
Posted by: tipper || 12/12/2006 21:13 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Sounds like the Fat Lady is tuning up....
Posted by: BrerRabbit || 12/12/2006 21:21 Comments || Top||

#2  Yup. Somebody's condition has definitely stabilized.
Posted by: Jonathan || 12/12/2006 22:25 Comments || Top||

#3  Be glad like hades that he's gone.

Turki has been the subject of both high praise and controversy. In the 1980s, while he was intelligence chief, he reportedly met al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden several times during the U.S. and Saudi-backed mujaheedin war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He subsequently denounced bin Laden.

Saudi envoy in UK linked to 9/11

Turki is up to his ears in terrorist circles. He is no friend of America.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/12/2006 22:38 Comments || Top||

#4  his replacement will be no better - they are friends of James Baker - that makes them America's enemies
Posted by: Frank G || 12/12/2006 23:46 Comments || Top||


Jihad Watch: Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis to seek refugee status in the United States
Let the (American) seething begin.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 04:26 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It will be the same as the Egyptians, Pakistanis, and Saudis before them: they will use American status to finance terror abroad. And if Americans react, 9-11 times 1000. The Muslim Brother, Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, al-Muhajiroun, etc were empowered by Western harborage.


Of course, I am assuming that the public won't recognize that Muslims can't be house broken in Western Civilization.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550 || 12/12/2006 4:40 Comments || Top||

#2  Guam + Andersen AFB-Big Navy to see another "-Lift", Milyuuhns and Zilyuuhns fleeing yet another Socialist Paradise on Earth for America???
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 4:43 Comments || Top||

#3  seethe

/no comfort, i predicted it tho...
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 12:38 Comments || Top||

#4  The USA should not take any Iraqi's. We've had people died so they could have their own country and letting them have refugee status would be an admission of failure that could cause serious problems.

If they must leave the Iraqi Christians should move to (a) Lebanon or (b) Israel. both could use some non-Muslims immigrants to help the demographic balance.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 12/12/2006 12:39 Comments || Top||

#5  For crissakes, how many convienience stores can there be in this country...
Posted by: tu3031 || 12/12/2006 12:40 Comments || Top||

#6  I think that the US should seriously consider granting refugee status to any Christian living in a Muslim country. Islam is antithetical to anyone who does not submit. Even benign muslim states do not protect Christian citizens from the Islamic crazies. See how the Muslim world likes losing their brightest and most productive citizens to the Great Satan.
Posted by: RWV || 12/12/2006 12:56 Comments || Top||

#7  Admit NO MUSLIMS.
Posted by: RWV || 12/12/2006 12:56 Comments || Top||

#8  I foresee an Islamic State of Michigan in our future.
Posted by: Thoth || 12/12/2006 13:44 Comments || Top||

#9  None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Bupkus. Not even those professing to be Christians, that old taqqiya thingy, ya know? No more immigration, not even for purposes of asylum from any Muslim majority nation.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/12/2006 17:36 Comments || Top||

#10  Why the fuk are we taking ANY Muslims?
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 17:48 Comments || Top||

#11  Maybe we should export a few..
Posted by: Snailet Gloth6512 || 12/12/2006 20:59 Comments || Top||

#12  #8 I foresee an Islamic State of Michigan in our future. Posted by: Thoth

Only long enough for a few thousand rednecks from the deep south to load up the truck with grits and guns, and head north.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 12/12/2006 21:48 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Pakistan says it never claimed Kashmir as its territory
Likewise, they have always been at war with Oceania.
Pakistan said on Monday it had never claimed Kashmir as an integral part of its territory, that its legal position was based on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions, and that it wanted a settlement that would be acceptable to itself, to India and to the people of Kashmir.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam made these remarks when asked to comment on President Pervez Musharraf's statements to an Indian TV channel that Pakistan would give up its claim on Kashmir if India showed similar flexibility. "First, Pakistan does not claim Kashmir. The dispute is about the aspirations of the Kashmiris. According to the UNSC resolutions, Pakistan and India are parties to this dispute, and Kashmiris have to essentially decide their future," Ms. Aslam said at the weekly briefing.

General Musharraf had not talked about unilaterally giving up Pakistan's position, nor were his proposals new. "He talked about flexibility, the need for flexibility by both sides, and he said that this cannot be unilateral," the spokesperson said.

Asked to clarify Pakistan's position, she said it was the legal position based on the UNSC resolutions for a plebiscite in the disputed territory. Pakistan "hoped" the Kashmiris would choose to join it, were a plebiscite to be held.

Ms. Aslam drew attention to Article 257 of the Pakistan Constitution that says, "When the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir decide to accede to Pakistan, the relationship between Pakistan and that State shall be determined in accordance with the wishes of the people of the State ... We have had many Constitutions, but that article has always been there ... You don't need any other proof that we have not made territorial claims on Kashmir.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Ms. Aslam drew attention to Article 257 of the Pakistan Constitution that says, "When the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir decide to accede to Pakistan

"When" ?
Suppose they didn't want to?

Even Kofi Annan has acknowledged that the UN resolutions on Kashmir are defunct.

Pakistan is yet to conform to the first resolution.. that one said that there should be a plebiscite to decide on accession to either India or Pakistan. All Pakistani troops were to leave Kashmir with, get this, Indian troops replacing them, as many as needed to guarantee security.

So Perv, how about conforming to the UN resolution and pulling your army and Punjabi settlers out of Kashmir?
Posted by: john || 12/12/2006 11:59 Comments || Top||

#2  And India does claim Jammu and Kashmir, all of it, including the Pak and Chinese occupied portions, based on an article of accession (as mandated by the Indian Independence 1947 act of the UK parliament), signed by the Maharajah and the last Viceroy of the Indian Empire, Lord Louis Mountbatten, cousin of the English Queen.

And Indian courts have ruled that there can be no secession from the Indian Union
Posted by: john || 12/12/2006 12:13 Comments || Top||

#3  Every adult in Kashmir should be allowed to vote on Pakistan, India, or independence. When the votes are tallied and form a base for future discussions.

My guess is the voters would simply split along the pre-existing occupation lines but we might be surprised. If they all want independence both India and Pakistan have a problem.

My gut instinct is that India should allow for partial independence of both Kashmir and Punjab. This would create friendly buffer states between themselves and Pakistan before Pakistan falls apart. The independence of both areas would probably push Pakistan into falling apart that much sooner.
Posted by: rjschwarz || 12/12/2006 15:13 Comments || Top||


New chief in Waziristan causes rift among Taliban ranks
The appointment of Maulvi Muhammad Nazir as new Taliban chief in south Waziristan has left some senior commanders unhappy as punishments under Islamic laws have begun taking effect, sources said on Monday. Certain Taliban commanders were unhappy over Nazir’s appointment after a high-level Jirga from Afghanistan recently visited south Waziristan, said tribal sources.

Haji Mohammad Omar, the senior commander who took charge of Taliban militants after group leader Nek Muhammad’s killing in a missile attack in June 2004, was quoted as saying that Nazir “deserved” to be appointed ameer. Omar is deputy to Maulvi Nazir, who tribal elders say is a “moderate” among other Taliban commanders and “dislikes attacking” Pakistani security forces.

Sources said that commanders Iftikhar and Ghulam Jan were previously “sacked” from the Taliban ranks for their alleged involvement in activities “contrary to jihad” and hence, their groups has also been dissolved. “There is a tense calm after the change of guard,” said sources, adding that Maulvi Nazir “enjoys more respect than other commanders among the local population because of his respect for local traditions.”

The Taliban ameer, meanwhile, constituted a peace committee to ensure law and order across Waziristan and one source said that a “foreign religious scholar” began issuing punishments under Shariah. “Three Uzbek militants were awarded dozens of lashes for involvement in criminal activity,” the source claimed, adding that no local tribesman had yet been punished under Islamic laws. Sources also said that the Taliban commanders were keeping the scholar’s identity and location secret.

Islamabad sent its troops to barracks after striking peace accords with tribal militant commanders in November 2004, and since then the local administration was restricted to offices as the Taliban took charge of Waziristan. Tribal sources said that the Taliban’s public image among the local population was “under serious threat” as criminals were roaming the streets “camouflaged as jihadis.”
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:


Waziristan peace deal: No parallel government in Waziristan: FATA Secretariat
The Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) Secretariat said on Monday that there was no parallel government in the North Waziristan Agency following a peace deal with local Taliban. “Tribal authorities are in control of the agency’s affairs,” said FATA Security Secretary Arbab Mohammad Arif while briefing media personnel after a meeting of FATA secretaries and political agents to review the law and order situation and development activities in tribal areas.

Arif rejected the reports that tribesmen sought Taliban’s help to resolve their disputes, and added that no cross border attacks were being carried out on Afghanistan from Pakistani soil. He said local Taliban had distributed a pamphlet to impose taxes on business activities in Waziristan, but that the tax had been withdrawn after a monitoring team negotiated with them (the Taliban).

He said the Waziristan peace deal would be implemented. “According to the deal, foreigners would either leave Pakistan or furnish guarantees to the authorities for their good conduct,” he said, adding that the peace accord’s implementation required time.

He said no peace deal had been made regarding the Bajaur strike that killed 82 people on October 30. Arif said the situation in Bajaur Agency was different from that of north and south Waziristan, and that there was no need for a peace deal similar to the one in Waziristan.

He said that after MNA Haroon Rashid’s resignation, by-elections for the vacant seat would be held on January 10, adding that around five candidates had submitted nomination papers towards that end.

He said there had been no ban on the entry of journalists to tribal areas. “Journalists’ entry had been disallowed for a short period due to security reasons,” he said. “During the meeting, political authorities were directed to ensure timely reporting of incidents taking place in their respective agencies to the FATA Secretariat for dissemination to media,” he added.

He said the political agents were also directed to send analysis reports to the secretariat on a monthly basis, and that the NWFP governor would also be kept informed of the reports. He said efforts would be made to increase interaction between the political authorities and media so that journalists could have easy access to information. Regarding the ongoing clash between two armed groups in Khyber Agency, the secretary said it was a local issue and that authorities were trying to sort out differences among rivals.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Sailing on the river denial, and assuming the rest of us are cruisin' with him. Predator his a$$.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 12/12/2006 22:04 Comments || Top||


ICG faults Pakistan for support of Taliban
The International Crisis Group (ICG) has accused Pakistan of “sheltering” the Taliban and other foreign militants, including Al Qaeda sympathisers, in the seven Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) since 2001.

A report issued by the group that was released on Monday said, “Using the region to regroup, reorganise and rearm, they (militants) are launching increasingly severe cross-border attacks on Afghan and international military personnel, with the support and active involvement of Pakistani militants. The Musharraf government’s ambivalent approach and failure to take effective action is destabilising Afghanistan.” The report recommended that Kabul’s allies, particularly the US and NATO, apply greater pressure on Pakistan to clamp down on pro-Taliban militants. However, it said the international community, too, was responsible because of its failure to support democratic governance in Pakistan, including within the tribal belt.

ICG claimed that the military operations Pakistan had launched since 2004 in South and North Waziristan to deny Al Qaeda and the Taliban safe haven and to curb cross-border militancy had failed, largely because of an approach alternating between “excessive force and appeasement.” When force has resulted in major military losses, the government has given amnesty to pro-Taliban militants in return for verbal commitments to end attacks on Pakistani security forces, cease cross-border militancy and curb foreign terrorists. The report said that following the September 2006 accord with tribal leaders, the government released militants, returned their weapons, disbanded security check posts and agreed to allow foreign terrorists to stay if they gave up violence. “While the army has virtually retreated to barracks, this accommodation facilitates the growth of militancy and attacks in Afghanistan by giving pro-Taliban elements a free hand to recruit, train and arm,” said ICG.

According to ICG, “Badly planned, poorly conducted military operations are also responsible for the rise of militancy in the tribal belt, where the loss of lives and property and displacement of thousands of civilians have alienated the population. The state’s failure to extend its control over and provide good governance to its citizens in FATA is equally responsible for empowering the radicals. The only sustainable way of dealing with the challenges of militancy, governance and extremism in FATA is through the rule of law and an extension of civil and political rights. Instead, the government has reinforced administrative and legal structures that undermine the state and spur anarchy.”

ICG maintained that although the Musharraf government promised reforms in FATA, it did not follow through. Instead, appeasement had allowed local militants to establish parallel, Taliban-style policing and court systems in the Waziristans, while Talibanisation also spreading into other FATA agencies and even the NWFP’s settled districts, it added. Broad-based economic development is necessary because FATA is one of Pakistan’s poorest regions. Since the outbreak of the Afghan civil war, there has been enormous growth in drugs and weapons trafficking. Militancy and extremism in tribal agencies cannot be tackled without firm action against criminality, but for this, economic grievances must be addressed and the law of the land extended over and enforced in FATA.

Ten recommendations made by ICG include the integration of FATA with the NWFP, removal of restrictions on political parties in FATA followed by party-based elections for both provincial and national legislatures, re-establishment of the writ of the state, and disarming of militants, shutting down terrorist training camps and ending the flow of money and weapons to militants on Pakistani territory. Parallel administrative structures by militants should be disbanded and the economic and industrial development of the area taken in hand in right earnest. Schools, colleges and vocational centres should be opened in FATA, with the media and human rights workers free to visit the area.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Yet another report that states Pakistans active in helping Taliban/Al Qaeda.

Why do we deal with Perv when its so obvious he is playing a double Game?????

Why not fund the moderate democratic organisations to replace Perv???
Posted by: Ebbolump Glomotle9608 || 12/12/2006 7:23 Comments || Top||

#2  There are moderate, daemocratic organizations in Pakistan? Please, Ebbolump Glomotle9608, name names!
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 8:57 Comments || Top||


International-UN-NGOs
Rice assails Annan speech as "idiotic" “missed opportunity”
WASHINGTON - US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice lamented a speech by retiring UN chief Kofi Annan criticising US foreign policy on Monday as a “real missed opportunity”.
Always the diplomat.
In an interview with AFP, Rice criticized Annan’s failure in the much-awaited speech to highlight the positive role she said Washington had played at the world body over the past two years.

“I would have hoped that it would have talked about the work that we’ve done together,” she said, recalling the joint launch of a global fund for AIDS, a recent resolution aimed at halting the violence in Sudan’s Darfur region and the UN ceasefire which ended the July-August war in Lebanon. “That ceasefire would not have happened without the United States,” she said.
We're Americans. We don't get much credit in the world for the good we do, and we never get credit when a Republican is President.
“I can go on and on about the positive things we have achieved in this period of time, and so I’m sorry that those were not the focus of the speech,” she said. “The speech is a real missed opportunity,” she said.
Kofi was a missed opportunity.
Posted by: Steve White || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Lol. DiploDink-Speak for Fuckwit.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 1:14 Comments || Top||

#2  It was a pleasure having you, Kofi.

Don't let the door hit ur anus too hard on the way out.
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087 || 12/12/2006 6:09 Comments || Top||

#3  Let's start selling tickets now. Avoid the rush, get in line for the "shit on Kofi Annan's grave tour".
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 7:09 Comments || Top||

#4  19 days.
Posted by: tu3031 || 12/12/2006 10:59 Comments || Top||

#5  I have decided to make one of those paper ring things that little kids use to count the days til Christmas. Actually I think I'll just steal my nephews and add a half dozen.

Can't wait to find out how mad my sister gets when he wakes up tomorrow thinking its Christmas already.
Posted by: Mike N. || 12/12/2006 11:47 Comments || Top||

#6  Just so I can calibrate my diplosphere decoder ring, is this "A missed opportunity to STFU?"

Posted by: eLarson || 12/12/2006 16:25 Comments || Top||

#7  “The speech is a real missed opportunity,” she said

...and then she attends Annan's farewell party which includes a brain storming session on how to throw Israel under the bus.
Posted by: Poison Reverse || 12/12/2006 16:30 Comments || Top||

#8  Rice misses an opportunity to slam Annan and boost Bolton's short tenure as the American ambassador to the UN. Rice is having some kind of bad year.
Posted by: wxjames || 12/12/2006 17:47 Comments || Top||


Iraq
Iraqis Seek Coalition to Curb Cleric : Tater Alert
Following discussions with the Bush administration, several of Iraq’s major political parties are in talks to form a coalition whose aim is to break the powerful influence of the radical Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr within the government, senior Iraqi officials say.

The talks are taking place among the two main Kurdish groups, the most influential Sunni Arab party and an Iranian-backed Shiite party that has long sought to lead the government. They have invited Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki to join them. But Mr. Maliki, a conservative Shiite who has close ties to Mr. Sadr, has held back for fear that the parties might be seeking to oust him, a Shiite legislator close to Mr. Maliki said.

Officials involved in the talks say their aim is not to undermine Mr. Maliki, but to isolate both Mr. Sadr and firebrand Sunni Arab politicians inside the government. Mr. Sadr controls a militia, the Mahdi Army, with an estimated 60,000 fighters that has rebelled twice against the American military and is accused of widening the sectarian war with reprisal killings of Sunni Arabs.

The Americans, frustrated with Mr. Maliki’s political dependence on Mr. Sadr, appear to be working hard to help build the new coalition. President Bush met last week in the White House with Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the leader of the Iranian-backed Shiite party, and is meeting this week with Tariq al-Hashemi, leader of the Sunni Arab party.

In late November, Mr. Bush and his top aides met with leaders from Sunni countries in the Middle East to urge them to press moderate Sunni Arab Iraqis to support Mr. Maliki.

Mr. Hakim’s and Mr. Hashemi’s White House visits are directly related to their effort to form a new alliance, a senior Iraqi official said.

Last month, Mr. Bush’s national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, wrote in a classified memo that the Americans should press Sunni Arab and Shiite leaders, especially Mr. Hakim, to support Mr. Maliki if he sought to build “an alternative political base.” The memo noted that Americans could provide “monetary support to moderate groups.”

Iraqi officials involved in the talks said they had conceived of the coalition themselves after growing frustrated with militant politicians.

“A number of key political parties, across the sectarian-ethnic divide, recognize the gravity of the situation and have become increasingly aware that their fate, and that of the country, cannot be held hostage by the whims of the extreme fringe within their communities,” said Barham Salih, a deputy prime minister and senior member of one of the major Kurdish parties.

Mr. Sadr’s relationship with Mr. Maliki has shown signs of strain. On Nov. 30, Mr. Sadr withdrew his 30 loyalists in Parliament and six cabinet ministers from the government. Mr. Maliki called for them to return, but they said they would do so only if Mr. Maliki and the Americans set a timetable for the withdrawal of American troops. Mr. Sadr reiterated the demand with a fiery message on Sunday.

Any plan to form a political alliance across sectarian lines that isolates Mr. Sadr and Sunni Arab extremists carries enormous risks. American and Iraqi officials have worked to try to persuade Mr. Sadr to use political power instead of armed force to bring about change in Iraq. Though it is unclear whether Mr. Sadr has total control over his militia, he could ignite another rebellion like the two he led in 2004 if he thinks he is being marginalized within the government.

Some senior American commanders say that the attempts to make peace with Mr. Sadr through politics may have failed, and that a military assault on Sadr strongholds may be inevitable.

Falah Shanshal, a Sadr legislator, on Monday denounced the idea of a new coalition. “We’re against any new bloc, new front or new alliance,” he said. “We have to make unity between us, to be one front against terrorism and to liberate the country from the occupation.”

Iraqi officials say the other main risk is a potential backlash against the parties involved in the talks from other leaders in their own ethnic or sectarian populations.

For Mr. Hakim and Mr. Maliki, any attempt to join Sunni Arabs in an alliance against Mr. Sadr could invoke the wrath of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most powerful Shiite cleric in Iraq. Since the toppling of Saddam Hussein, the ayatollah has worked hard to bring various feuding Shiite factions into one greater Shiite coalition to rule Iraq. That coalition, including Mr. Sadr’s allies, is the dominant bloc in the 275-member Parliament.

Mr. Hashemi, the Sunni Arab leader, risks alienating other members of the main Sunni bloc in Parliament. Sunni Arab insurgents could also decide to step up violence against Mr. Hashemi and his Iraqi Islamic Party. Three of Mr. Hashemi’s siblings have already been killed.

Sunni Arab politicians not involved in the talks said they are furious at the proposed alliance.

Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 12/12/2006 10:42 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Perceptive of them.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 14:56 Comments || Top||

#2  Byzantium was politically simple compared to Arabs. 'Byzantine' needs to change to "Arabine".
Posted by: Brett || 12/12/2006 15:10 Comments || Top||

#3  Can't Sadr have a heart attack or something? Fatal gingivitis?
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/12/2006 19:09 Comments || Top||

#4  Crush Sadr, tell Sistani that if he wants to live, he gets out of politics totally, and smack -hard - anybody else that thinks their people are more important than a unified Iraq. Should have done this FIRST, but it's not too late. Let the entire WORLD know we are not afraid to target and destroy a mosque - any mosque. When the first idiot raises his head, slam him down so hard it'll take ten years do dig the remains up.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 12/12/2006 23:12 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Olmert, in Europe, hints Israel has nuclear arms
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Even though Olmert is a putz, only al-Reuters would think this is news. Israel has had nuclear weapons since the mid 70's, something widely known in the Arab world, if not by Reuters.
Posted by: RWV || 12/12/2006 0:22 Comments || Top||

#2  It is a message for Iran and for George junior.
Posted by: gromgoru || 12/12/2006 0:40 Comments || Top||

#3  Had that vasectomy, yet? Hurry, k?
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 1:08 Comments || Top||

#4  If Olmert "let this slip" it is yet another sign of his catastrophic incompetence. The wrong man for the job at the wrong time and the chain of events which follow could be the death of us; starting with the end of Israel. When will Israel's parliament take a vote of no confidence in this man?
Posted by: Excalibur || 12/12/2006 10:28 Comments || Top||

#5  tempest in tea pot graphic
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 12:40 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
Shared intelligence prevented terror attacks: Malaysia
Malaysia on Monday said sharing quality intelligence with Indonesia had prevented militants from launching any major regional terror attacks since the second Bali bomb blast last year. “Malaysia and Indonesia are quite pleased with the situation. There are many factors behind it,” Malaysia’s Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak said. “One of the factors is that we have been able to have quality preemptive intelligence reports to nip it in the bud,” he told reporters. A triple suicide bombing last October on the resort island of Bali in Indonesia killed 20 people and the bombers. Najib, who is also the defence minister, said by obtaining intelligence early, authorities could detect groups that plan to conduct “acts of terrorism” long before they are able to do anything. He cited the example of Malaysian police’s move against a local terror group, Darul Islam, in the eastern Sabah state before it could mount an attack. “One example of the success is the uncovering of the militant group Darul Islam in Sabah. This is an example of the preemptive work we have done,” he said. Malaysian police in May said they had crushed the militant group’s underground network, which had collaborated with Indonesian militants, through multiple arrests between March and April.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Lebanese Cabinet Sends International Tribunal Text to Parliament
The Lebanese cabinet sent to parliament Tuesday a controversial text calling for the creation of a Special International Tribunal for Lebanon.
So much for the Syrian ploy of trading the SIT for an end to the "crisis".
"The Council of Ministers unanimously decided to send the U.N. draft on the creation of an international court to try suspects in the assassination of Rafik Hariri," Telecommunications Minister Marwan Hamadeh told Agence France Presse after a meeting of the cabinet's remaining ministers at the Grand Serail.

"This is an important step in the ratification procedure ... and also affirms the presence and continuity of the government," he said.

"This shows (President Emile) Lahoud and his Syrian allies who want to destabilize Lebanon that the government is moving forward on its path."

Six pro-Syrian ministers resigned last month amid a political crisis that has paralyzed Premier Fouad Saniora's government and sparked mass opposition protests in downtown Beirut.

Saniora, whose offices have been surrounded since December 1 by thousands of opposition protesters loyal to Hizbullah and General Michel Aoun, has refused to accept their resignations.

Following the withdrawals, the remaining cabinet members went ahead and approved the final draft of a U.N. resolution on creating the court, which must get the nod from parliament before being sent to the U.N. Security Council for adoption.

Lahoud promptly rejected the text, saying it was approved by an illegitimate cabinet that did not represent the Lebanese people.
So says a man imposed on the Lebanese people by Syrian threats.
According to Lebanon's constitution, the legal quorum for a cabinet meeting is a majority of two thirds of its members.

The constitution also says the government can submit a draft text to parliament even if it is not signed by the head of state.
Posted by: mrp || 12/12/2006 14:46 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Telecommunications Minister Marwan Hamadeh better have someone dispensable start his car every morning
Posted by: Frank G || 12/12/2006 20:08 Comments || Top||

#2  Cluster bombs. Thousands of them, on the streets "clogged with protesters". In a couple of hours, the streets will be clogged with the bodies of dead protesters. All Israel has to do is to hit the streets about 3:00AM, local time. Hezbollah will be trampled by the survivors.

While they're at it, Olmert should use those nukes he's talking about to wipe out everything living between the Israeli border and the Litani, with the promise of going further north if Hezbollah tries to retaliate. Screw UNIFIL - they're totally worthless, and only get in the way. If France bitches, take out the DeGaulle - in port. Israel will have a secure northern border - secured by a radioactive desert.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 12/12/2006 23:17 Comments || Top||


Ahmadinejad: Israel to disappear like USSR
The Tehran Holocaust denial conference entered its second day Tuesday, hosting Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the man who inspired the conference with his remarks. "Israel is about to crash," the Iranian president promised the attendees, "scientists" from across the world working to deny the Holocaust. "This is God's promise and the wish of all the world's nations," he added.
Much more at the link. Also features a picture of hot Ahmadinejad on Neturei Karta make-out action. That one is a keeper.
Posted by: Thoth || 12/12/2006 13:52 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Why, thank you, Mr. Broken Record.
This is getting like Hugo assassination plots...
Posted by: tu3031 || 12/12/2006 14:10 Comments || Top||

#2  Would love to have seen Putin's face when he read that.
Posted by: Jules || 12/12/2006 14:16 Comments || Top||

#3  Also if he was reading the papers, he'd know the USSR never actually went away. It just got more sneaky and more lethal. And its enemies are dying alone and in agony, with radiation melting their guts from the inside out.
Posted by: Seafarious || 12/12/2006 14:16 Comments || Top||

#4  It looks like Amadiwhackjob and Neturei Karta are about to French kiss. It seriously turned my stomach.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 12/12/2006 14:51 Comments || Top||

#5  Sea-Yep. The name went away, but the capacity for treachery remains.
Posted by: Jules || 12/12/2006 15:23 Comments || Top||

#6  Just a note - not all Szatmar are Neturei Karta, the MSM has a hard time keeping them apart. While Szatmar is definitely anti-Zionist, they generally shun the clownish antics of Neturei Karta.
Posted by: liberalhawk || 12/12/2006 15:53 Comments || Top||

#7  The sickening part is that, several Jewish Orthodox Rabbi's was present at this conference declaring solidarity collusion with Mahmoud AhMADinejad.
Posted by: Poison Reverse || 12/12/2006 15:57 Comments || Top||

#8  Hugging a Jooooo? Me thinks this might make for bad press in Iran.
Posted by: 0369_Grunt || 12/12/2006 17:19 Comments || Top||

#9  Is there a reason Neturei Karta is slipping his tongue up the dinnerjacket's right nostril ?
Posted by: wxjames || 12/12/2006 17:32 Comments || Top||

#10  From what I've read, and assuming I understand correctly, the NK boyz say that :

- The jews can't choose to renounce to their dispersal, which is a divine punishment of their faults.

- There indeed were 6 millions killed in the shoah, but it was also divine punition; escaping to the holocaust was individually possible at the time, but there's no asking for excuse, no putting nazis on trial, and so on. Only choice is to accept this collective divine punishment.

-Zionists are heretics when they affirm their intent to prevent an another genocide.

Overall impression is : Will To Live dangerously low.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/12/2006 17:34 Comments || Top||

#11  Oh, THAT line will make him Mr. Popular in Moscow...
Posted by: mojo || 12/12/2006 17:35 Comments || Top||

#12  Is there a reason Neturei Karta is slipping his tongue up the dinnerjacket's right nostril ?
Love is in the air.

Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/12/2006 17:43 Comments || Top||

#13  There are striking similarities between Iran and the Soviet Union. A multi-ethnic state where the largest ethnic group is a bare majority, held together by a radical ideology. Also Iran's parallel government structure, the Pasadran (Revolutionary Guards, etc.) is explicitly modelled on the communist system.

I'd say Iran is an excellent candidate for Soviet Union type collapse, assuming it doesn't decend into Yugoslav type civil war first.
Posted by: phil_b || 12/12/2006 18:24 Comments || Top||

#14  Would love to have seen Putin's face when he read that

Perhaps Vlad should invite him over for some sushi and some Po 210.
Posted by: DMFD || 12/12/2006 18:27 Comments || Top||

#15  A5089 - precious!
Posted by: Frank G || 12/12/2006 18:39 Comments || Top||

#16  And I'd add, while we talk about the collapse of the Soviet Union, it wasn't really a collapse. Moscow realized that ethnic Russians would soon be a minority and under a domocracy would lose control of the country. Solution = divest itself of the non-Russian republics.

Iran is in exactly the same situation. Ethnic Persians are probably already a minority in the country.
Posted by: phil_b || 12/12/2006 18:41 Comments || Top||

#17  Show me some butt crack, baby!
Posted by: Raj || 12/12/2006 18:45 Comments || Top||

#18  A5089 - precious!

dittos!

#12 looks a little like my uniform.
*plumber* that is! lol!

*note no Hawaiian shirt*
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 18:56 Comments || Top||

#19  several Jewish Orthodox Rabbi's was present at this conference declaring solidarity collusion with Mahmoud AhMADinejad.

Hugging a Jooooo? Me thinks this might make for bad press in Iran.

I suppose this makes the perfect dilemma! :-)
Posted by: gorb || 12/12/2006 22:56 Comments || Top||


Hizbullah smiles on Arab League plan, but Cabinet stays quiet
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 12/12/2006 09:07 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  especially cool that an envoy from the genocidal regime of the Sudan is mediating this at the moment
Posted by: mhw || 12/12/2006 12:05 Comments || Top||


Iran speeds up nuclear plant payments to Russia
Construction of the Bushehr plant delayed, forcing Tehran to accelerate payments to Russia to complete it on schedule. 'Every country in the world has the right to develop nuclear industries for peaceful purposes and this goes for Iran too,' says Russian atomic director

Iran will accelerate its payments to Russia so that the latter will complete the construction of the Bushehr power plant according to the agreed schedule, this according to the head of the Russian atomic agency on Monday.

Russia has been contracted by Iran to construct a light water reactor for the Bushehr nuclear power plant, which Iran claims will only be used for civilian purposes.

Busheher is separate from the uranium enrichment projects concentrated primarily in the Natnaz and Isfahan sites. Iran has agreed to pay Russia USD 800 million for the construction of the reactor – Russia in turn pledged to complete the job within several months, but the project encountered numerous financial and bureaucratic hurdles.

Until recently the construction of the reactor was a key factor in the dispute between Russia and the West regarding global sanctions on Iran. Western states wanted to forbid the sale of Russian nuclear fuel to Iran as part of the sanctions.

Russia opposed the clause and rejected the grave sanctions. However, the West recently displayed flexibility over the issue, saying that Russia may continue to construct the reactor and sell nuclear fuel to Iran after its completion, even to a sanctioned Tehran. This Western flexibility hopes that Russia will now drop its objection over the sanctions.

Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki and Head of the Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency Sergei Kiriyenko signed a 17-clause agreement, pledging cooperation in matters of energy, gas, electricity, nuclear energy, technology, space and commerce.

Kiriyenko also met with Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Director Gholamreza Aqazadeh to discuss the works at Bushehr. Agazadeh said during a joint press conference with Kiriyenko that Iran has decided to provide assistance beyond previous agreements to Russia in order to solve the technical problems of the power plant and to bring it on stream on schedule.

IAE Deputy Director Mohammad Saeedi emphasized that, “Iran will not pay Russia more than what has been agreed.”

Iranian FM Mottaki said that the construction of the light water reactor is a symbol of Iran-Russia relations.

"Iran’s nuclear issue must be resolved through diplomatic channels," said Kiriyenko, adding that Russia believes that "every country in the world has the right to develop nuclear industries for peaceful purposes and this goes for Iran too."
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 03:08 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  WORLDTRIBUNE.com > Israel fears fighting TWO-FRONT WAR [Gaza agz Radic Paleos, Syria-Hizzies-Iran? in Lebanon] in 2007. OTOH, YAHOO NEWS > Minor = Regional Nuke war will still be bad for enviro, plus 3-17M "immediate casualties", thus key to global security is to prevent small states from acquiring nukes. READ - STOP IRAN, etal Rogues.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 3:53 Comments || Top||

#2  The Ruskies are in it for the money. Once they get the cash, who cares if it is blown up real good.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550 || 12/12/2006 4:45 Comments || Top||


Students Cry ‘Death to the Dictator’ as Iranian Leader Speaks
The NYT take...
TEHRAN, Dec. 11 — Students disrupted a speech by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Monday at a major university in Tehran, setting fire to photographs of him and throwing firecrackers.

The protesters chanted “death to the dictator” and demanded the resignation of Alireza Rahai, a conservative and the chancellor of the institution, Amirkabir University, the Iranian Student News Agency reported. Mr. Rahai was appointed to the post after Mr. Ahmadinejad was elected. Amirkabir, a polytechnic university in downtown Tehran, has been a center of student dissent.

Continued on Page 49
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 02:20 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Good for them. However, I've always felt that the students were too proud to ask for help. There's a major disconnect in thinking between what they think they can accomplish versus what it would really take to restore democracy to their country. They take a look at how regime change took place in nations with a Judaeo-Christian/Western mindset, and think that its just as easy to do the same thing in a nation whose people are programmed by Islam. Steeped in the belief that belief in Islam bestows inherent superiority over those that do not, they believe they can accomplish their aims without the need for outside aid. Although the Americans were prepared to fight alone, they welcomed the help of others, including *spit* France! *spit*
Posted by: Ptah || 12/12/2006 8:01 Comments || Top||


KKK's Duke is guest at Holocaust 'debate'
Simply everyone was there, dahling.
TEHRAN, IRAN — Iran held a gathering that included Holocaust deniers, discredited scholars and white supremacists from around the world on Monday under the guise of a conference to "debate" the Nazi slaughter of 6 million Jews.
The Flat World morons are more credible.
Among those representing the United States was the former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, whose prepared remarks, issued by the Iranian Foreign Ministry, said the gas chambers in which millions perished actually did not exist.

Robert Faurisson, an academic from France, said in his speech that the Holocaust was a myth created to justify the occupation of Palestine, meaning the creation of Israel.

This is what Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has frequently claimed, and it was Ahmadinejad's statements that inspired the foreign ministry to hold the conference. The ministry said 67 people from 30 countries were participating in the two days of meetings.

In a welcoming speech, Rasoul Mousavi, head of the Foreign Ministry's Institute for Political and International Studies, said the session would provide an opportunity to discuss the Holocaust "away from Western taboos and the restriction imposed on them in Europe." In several European countries, denial of the Holocaust is a crime.

Speakers at the conference praised Ahmadinejad's comments about the Holocaust.
Finally, a "world leader" who understands us!
Bendikt Frings, 48, a psychologist from Germany, said he believed Ahmadinejad was "an honest, direct man." He said he had come to the conference to thank the president for what he initiated. "We are forbidden to have such a conference in Germany," he said. "All my childhood, we waited for something like this."

Frederick Toben, from Australia, said Ahmadinejad had opened an issue "which is morally and intellectually crippling the Western society. People are imprisoned in Germany for denying the Holocaust," he added.

Duke argued that inventions about what happened to Europe's Jews were part of a plot. He said, "Depicting Jews as the overwhelming victims of the Holocaust gave the moral high ground to the Allies as victors of the war and allowed Jews to establish a state on the occupied land of Palestine."

The event has sparked outrage in the West.
I'm sparked. Outraged? No, I expect no more from the Bottom-Feeders.
Germany summoned the Iranian chargé d'affaire to express its anger, and the French foreign minister, Philippe Douste-Blazy, has condemned the conference.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 01:59 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1 
What's up this group of anti-Israel Jews in Iran? I've often wondered if their 'position' on Israel has much to do with the 'position' this small group of the Diaspora lives in. Otherwise why the hell would they even give the time of day to Mad Mood Imadinnerjacket?

I've watched them on MEMRI a couple times before.
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 2:54 Comments || Top||

#2  read this RD

/he who helps himself....
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 3:39 Comments || Top||

#3  I recall there are Jews who think the state of Israel is not on the road map to the end of times, i.e. it's a barrier.

Maybe, someone who knows more about Jewish theosophily could help me out here.
Posted by: phil_b || 12/12/2006 3:55 Comments || Top||

#4  Don't let Duke back in the US. Make him stay in his Judenrein paradise.
Posted by: Glenmore || 12/12/2006 8:26 Comments || Top||

#5  Good article, RD. Notice that there aren't any women in that group in the photo, also the archaic dress and carefully trained earlocks. This group is a tiny extremist sect, but they get a lot of press amongst the anti-Zionists of the world, who are thrilled to be able to quote Jews calling for the erasure of Israel. They have about as much validity as David Duke. I first heard about them here at Rantburg, from trolls raving against Israel.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 9:08 Comments || Top||

#6  The West is not "outraged", it's "appalled". There's a difference. We're constantly amazed at the collective stupidity of muslims - and the psychopaths they attrack to their death cult.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412 || 12/12/2006 10:21 Comments || Top||

#7  exactly - revoke the passports and citizenship of the pond scum attendees, and let them live in Dinnerjacket's paradise.
Posted by: Frank G || 12/12/2006 10:23 Comments || Top||

#8  To be honest, how different is this meeting from the ones held every week in the un? Hell pretty much the same players, statements, complaints, and denials. Too bad the press doesn't open their eyes and see that.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 12/12/2006 10:50 Comments || Top||

#9  I take it those are the Jews Antiwar kept referring to.
Posted by: Thoth || 12/12/2006 10:59 Comments || Top||

#10  Probably think if they get The Grand Dragon in on this as the token American, it'll lend it some "legitimacy".
Kinda like having Jimmy Carter watchdog your election...
Posted by: tu3031 || 12/12/2006 11:04 Comments || Top||

#11  exactly - revoke the passports and citizenship of the pond scum attendees, and let them live in Dinnerjacket's paradise.

I nominate sum non attendees Jummah Carter, rev Jackson, Cynthia McKinney, entire CAIR org etc
Posted by: RD || 12/12/2006 12:02 Comments || Top||

#12  Thems the ones Thoth slam crazy. Their weird little sect had a part in the "Black Sunday" (the blimp bomb at the Superbowl flick)
Posted by: Shipman || 12/12/2006 15:20 Comments || Top||

#13  some ultra orthodox Jews, esp some Hasidic groups, beleive A. That big issues in general lie in the hand of G-d, and that humans should not attempt to shape history. They are fatalists, quietists, like the Amish in some ways (though not absolute pacifists - shooting an intruder wouldnt count as trying to shape history) B. That the Jewish state can only be established by King-Messiah, and that any attempt by humans to do so is blasphemy. That the Zionist attempt has led SOME Orthodox Jews to cooperate closely with Jewish secularists only makes it even more offensive.

Most Hasidic groups, however, have more or less made peace with Israel, and accept it as morally neutral - they will accept subsidies from it, and participate in its elections, the same way they would with a gentile govt in the diaspora. The Szatmar however, and I think also the Muncach, are still strongly opposed to the state, and attack it verbally. Neturie Karta is a faction within Szatmar that goes around grabbing publicity by hanging out with Islamofascist types. They are minority within a minority (the Szatmar) within a minority (the Orthodox) within a minority (The Jews)
Posted by: liberalhawk || 12/12/2006 16:01 Comments || Top||

#14  Correction - by humans OTHER than King-Messiah. The Szatmar certainly share the tenet of traditional Jewish theology that the Messiah will be a human.
Posted by: liberalhawk || 12/12/2006 16:02 Comments || Top||

#15  The Aryan Nations main page is full of jihadi propaganda now. Their fig-leaf is some positive commentary about Arabs made by Hitler in his "My Jihad" bio. But basically I think their retardation is showing.
Posted by: Excalibur || 12/12/2006 16:23 Comments || Top||

#16 
Nazi Designers of Death

More than six million people were killed as part of the Nazi genocide called the Holocaust. More than one million of those people died in two neighboring concentration camps in Poland - Auschwitz and Birkenau. After the Nazis abandoned the camps in December 1944, Russian troops freed the remaining prisoners, destroyed the buildings, and secretly took most of the records from the camps back to Moscow.

In the aftermath of the war, survivors told horrifying stories of gas chambers, mass graves, and huge crematoriums. Many Nazi leaders were convicted of serious war crimes on the basis of these testimonies. However, without specific records such as blueprints and written orders, investigators had some difficulty determining the extent of Hitler's plans for mass extermination. Some Nazi leaders argued that the camps were used only as labor camps and that the crematoriums were used merely to burn the bodies of prisoners who had died of disease or from the harsh conditions. Nearly 50 years later, NOVA joins a British historian who has gained access to the files and gathered powerful evidence to show how Nazi death camps were planned and constructed.

The Nazis had a mania for documentation. Despite attempts to destroy records and blueprints from the death camps, some survived and were closely examined in order to verify the intended purpose of these installations. This 1995 NOVA documentary went to great pains in order to scientifically identify the real and intended function of these facilities.

Features such as railway spurs and occupancy levels were carefully analysed to establish beyond doubt the ghastly purpose of these murder machines. Using industrial throughput calculations, it is demonstrated that these structures were built first and foremost for the bulk processing of freshly killed human remains.

David Duke is consorting with the enemy. He is providing moral support and participating in a convention whose sole purpose is revisionism. He needs to be declared persona non grata.
Posted by: Zenster || 12/12/2006 16:46 Comments || Top||

#17  liberalhawk, thank you for the detailed clarification. I only knew the barest outlines. Zenster, I didn't know that serious research had been done on the industrial design of the camps -- very useful information! :-) Excalibur, the sad thing about the Aryan Nation and their ilk is they never fail to exceed the lowest expectations.
Posted by: trailing wife || 12/12/2006 22:20 Comments || Top||

#18  Don't our passports still mark Iran as a "Do not visit under major mojo" nation?
So visit major mojo jail time on David Duke when the grand wizard returns.
Posted by: 3dc || 12/12/2006 23:38 Comments || Top||


Russia praises new resolution on Iran nuke program
Key European nations presented the UN Security Council with a retooled draft resolution on Iran's nuclear program, which includes the names of top Iranian officials and organizations that would be targeted by proposed sanctions. UN ambassadors said negotiators wanted to move swiftly on the draft, which would punish Iran for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment and urge it to continue negotiations over its nuclear program. They said they anticipate a Security Council vote before the end of the year.

The draft resolution, which was circulated to Security Council members Friday, had been revised by France, Britain and Germany to try to satisfy changes sought by Russia - an Iranian ally and a veto-wielding member of the Security Council. The new draft specifies in greater detail exactly what materials and technology would be prohibited from being supplied to Iran for possible use in its nuclear and missile programs. The Russians and Chinese had previously complained that proposed sanctions were too broad.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Revised sanctions list now approves everything but gumdrops & chocolate bunnies. Is that gonna work for ya, Putie ?
Posted by: SpecOp35 || 12/12/2006 1:17 Comments || Top||


Iran meeting questions Holocaust and gas chambers
Iran staged a conference on Monday to debate the Holocaust and question whether Nazi Germany used gas chambers, prompting charges it was encouraging the denial of the killing of 6 million Jews during World War Two. Guests at the government-run event, titled "Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision", included Westerners who have cast doubt on the Holocaust -- some of them from countries that have made it a crime to deny it happened -- as well as a few Jews.

"The aim of this conference is not to deny or confirm the Holocaust," Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said. "Its main aim is to create an opportunity for thinkers who cannot express their views freely in Europe about the Holocaust." The two-day conference at a Foreign Ministry institute was inspired by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who since coming to power in August 2005 has sparked international condemnation by terming the Holocaust a "myth" and calling Israel a "tumour".
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


U.N. Council considers Iran nuke resolution
Britain and France plan to introduce on Monday a revised U.N. Security Council draft resolution imposing sanctions on Iran for refusing to suspend uranium enrichment and hope to put the measure to a vote in the next two weeks. In an effort to get Russian support, the two nations, along with Germany and backed by the United States, circulated to the 15 council members on Friday a new draft that narrowed bans to the most dangerous bomb-building materials and technology.
Posted by: Fred || 12/12/2006 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  See also SPACEWAR.com > SecState Condi wants North Korea de-nuked in 24 months = [by]2008.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 12/12/2006 1:27 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Imams Booted Off Plane Want $ettlement From USAir
Ousted imams want airline settlement
WASHINGTON, Dec. 11 (UPI) -- Five of six Muslim imams who were taken off a US Airways flight in Minneapolis last month want an out-of-court settlement from the airline for the ordeal.
Ordeal?
After the Nov. 28 incident, the airline offered to meet with the group of clerics Dec. 4, but the men declined and instead sought legal help from the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington.

"With the hopes of reaching an amicable resolution to this matter, we would like to take this opportunity to ask for a formal meeting with US Airways executives and legal counsel," Arsalan Iftikhar, CAIR's national legal director, wrote to the airline.
CAIR. Figures.
There are conflicting reports of what happened after security agents escorted the men off the plane based on other passengers' complaints of suspicious activity, the Washington Times said Monday.

CAIR claims the men were handcuffed for several hours, but one of the imams told the Times he was only handcuffed for "10 or 15 minutes" and that the imams were not led off the plane in handcuffs.
Taqiyya, baby. I'll bet there are security tapes which prove it, one way or t'other.
An airline spokeswoman said the meeting request was received, but a date has not been set.
Tell 'em, politely, to Fuck Off. Beat 'em like a drum. Ticket sales will (continue to) skyrocket, lol.
Posted by: .com || 12/12/2006 01:39 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "Here's your packet of nuts. Have a nice day."
Posted by: Robert Crawford || 12/12/2006 6:23 Comments || Top||

#2  Five 1/2 way tickets sounds like suitable compensation.
Posted by: Skidmark || 12/12/2006 6:59 Comments || Top||

#3  How about five to twenty in a federal-pound-me-in-the-ass-prison for instigating a hijack scare?

Or would the Imams consider that a benefit?
Posted by: CrazyFool || 12/12/2006 8:20 Comments || Top||

#4  Take a jury trial. Unless its in Detroit, I'd wouldn't worry.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 12/12/2006 9:08 Comments || Top||

#5  Straight out of Jesse Jacksons playbook. Maybe USair could give them some beer distributorships.
They got their money back shortly after they were "deplaned"... that quicker than any white businessperson would get a refund from USscare.
Posted by: Capsu 78 || 12/12/2006 10:11 Comments || Top||

#6  If you have a chance, stop by and write US Air a thank you note to the crew for their actions. I also encouraged them to fight the lawsuit.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 12/12/2006 10:54 Comments || Top||

#7  There's people in hell wanting ice water, but they ain't gonna get it either.
Posted by: mojo || 12/12/2006 11:16 Comments || Top||

#8  Oh, and wait for the discovery process to begin. We're in for some interesting revelations about these people, their contacts and associates.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 12/12/2006 11:30 Comments || Top||

#9  Where do I go to contribute to the US Airways Legal Defense Fund?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 12/12/2006 14:40 Comments || Top||

#10  If you go to US Air, they have an easy contact us form
Posted by: ex-lib || 12/12/2006 15:08 Comments || Top||

#11  I can't imagine US Airways will cave. Arsalan Iftikhar has got to be a household name by now, having threatened to sue just about everyone on the planet -- including me. A few years back, I wrote a column for a college paper that contained one sentence referencing CAIR's terror connections.

Six hours after it was posted online, at a university several hundred miles from DC, he e-mailed me and the editors with all kinds of demands and threats, and threats if we told anyone about the demands and threats. I presented a pile of evidence to the editors and counsel that my claim was true, and luckily, they had a backbone. They told him to piss off, and that was the last we heard of it.

And that's all anyone has to do to put an end to this shit.
Posted by: exJAG || 12/12/2006 16:11 Comments || Top||

#12  Oh yeah, funny side note. I forwarded Arse's threat letter to Daniel Pipes, and he sent a most interesting reply.

My column stated simply that five CAIR officials had been arrested, deported, or convicted on terrorism charges, without naming names. In attacking this claim, Arse did name names, mentioning a Rabih Haddad who had been a CAIR official in Michigan.

Pipes reponded that he knew Haddad was a jihadi player, but hadn't been able to confirm his association with CAIR. Until he read Arse's furiously dashed-off letter, that is.

They don't call em "jihadiots" for nothng, LOL.
Posted by: exJAG || 12/12/2006 16:23 Comments || Top||

#13  Like I mentioned in the other thread dealing with this, US Airways needs to file a countersuit.

It is clear these individuals conspired to interfere with their flight. As I recall, they occupied 9-11 seating positions with one of them in first class without any ticketing for it. I also seem to recall that their initial 9-11 positions we counter to their personal seating assignments as well. These simple points, along with how they managed to trigger so many other separate security threshholds with their actions should be sufficient to obtain a rather damaging settlement.

Any comments, exJAG?
Posted by: Zenster || 12/12/2006 17:31 Comments || Top||

#14  we counter - S/B "WERE COUNTER"
Posted by: Zenster || 12/12/2006 17:32 Comments || Top||

#15  Can I shoot them ?
Just one of 'em ?
Pulleeeese !
Posted by: wxjames || 12/12/2006 17:52 Comments || Top||

#16  Shit I was in that airport that day. I should counter sue!

Clearly Arsalan Iftikhar is looking to buy a fresh goat to bugger.

I posted an early story today about the Imam's Mooslum terrorist connections printed in the Minneapolis Star Tribune. Wonder if it got posted...
Posted by: Icerigger || 12/12/2006 17:52 Comments || Top||

#17  Waiting for Keith Ellison's name to surface in this one.
Posted by: Grunter || 12/12/2006 22:49 Comments || Top||

#18  I'll settle with them. How about six, 45 cal enimas?
Posted by: anymouse || 12/12/2006 23:58 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
95[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Tue 2006-12-12
  Hamas gunnies kill three little sons of Abbas aide in Gaza
Mon 2006-12-11
  Talabani lashes out at 'dangerous' Baker report
Sun 2006-12-10
  Lahoud refuses to endorse Hariri tribunal accord
Sat 2006-12-09
  Chicago jihad boy nabbed in grenade plot
Fri 2006-12-08
  Olmert vows to do nothing ''show restraint'' in face of Kassams
Thu 2006-12-07
  Soddy forces, gunnies shoot it out
Wed 2006-12-06
  Sudan rejects U.N. compromise deal on Darfur
Tue 2006-12-05
  Talibs "repel" Brit assault
Mon 2006-12-04
  Bolton to resign
Sun 2006-12-03
  First blood drawn in Beirut
Sat 2006-12-02
  Hezbers begin campaign to force Siniora out
Fri 2006-12-01
  Hundreds killed, wounded in south Sudan clashes
Thu 2006-11-30
  'Israel losing patience over truce violations'
Wed 2006-11-29
  Kashmir bad boyz offer conditional hudna
Tue 2006-11-28
  Two Kassams land in Sderot area


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
3.145.77.114
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (25)    Non-WoT (15)    Opinion (8)    Local News (13)    (0)