A number of incidents are showing the deep incompatibility of radical Islam with modern medicine. Here are a trio to get this blog going, with more examples to be listed, in reverse chronological order, as they occur:
Muslim visitors refuse anti-bacterial gel: British hospitals offer dispensers with anti-bacterial gel outside wards so that visitors can be sure not to bring in such infections as MRSA and PVL. But the gel contains alcohol, prompting some Muslims to refuse to use the hand cleansers on religious grounds. A National Health Service employee, Theresa Poupa told in December 2006 of her experience visiting a sick relative at the London Chest Hospital:
I could not believe it - the signs are large enough and clear enough but they just took no notice and walked straight onto the ward. I was there almost every day for three weeks and I saw it repeated dozens and dozens of times. When I raised the matter with the nursing staff they just shrugged and said that Muslims were refusing to use the gel because it contained alcohol. They said they couldn't force visitors to use the gel and I understand that but I was astonished that anyone who didn't wash their hands was allowed onto a ward. I know the dangers that bugs like MRSA can cause. They kill hundreds of patients a year.
Male refused treatment by female doctors: A 17-year-old male shepherd from Konya, Turkey, referred to only as "A.G.," arrived at the Konya Testing Hospital complaining of swollen testicles. He was sent to get ultrasound tests, but two headscarved (i.e., Islamist) female radiology doctors refused him service. Not receiving proper attention, A.G. later had one of his testicles removed by operation. The case has provoked much attention. The hospital's head of urology, Celal Tutuncu, portrayed the case as very "black and white," and said that action would be taken. Members of the opposition CHP party raised the case in parliament in December 2006. A CHP lawyer, Atilla Kart, noted that "This is the destruction wrought by religious references spilling over into public administration."
Male relatives preventing female patients from being treated by male doctors: So rampant is the problem in France of Muslim husbands preventing their wives and other female relatives from being treated by male doctors (for example, women in labor have not had epidurals because the anesthetist was a man) that Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin reportedly planned in February 2004 to propose legislation to stop this from happening (how he plans to do this is not explained).
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 07:13 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[3 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
What happens to the batteries after their useful life? The environmentalists will have a cow if it doesn't meet their guidelines.
Posted by: Jonathan ||
01/03/2007 9:10 Comments ||
Top||
#2
That's what people forget about hybrids and electrics. The fact they take exotic materials that are quite hazardous and polluting. If you have a wreck in a normal car, it'll get cleaned up pretty quick. You have a wreck in an electric car and it's batteries are broken, you have a heavy metal haz mat site that will require a haz mat clean up crew hours to clear, at least.
The site for dead and old batteries would likely end up on the Superfund clean up list.
#3
Further, those plug-ins that are left connected to an electrical socket after being fully charged can substitute for expensive natural gas by providing electricity from their batteries back to the grid
Am I missing something or is this as stupid as it sounds?
#5
Steve,
The theory is that the battery powered cars will take the cheap off peak electricity and store it so that some of it can be "re-tapped" during peak hours. I think this was in Peter Huber's The Bottomless Well.
Posted by: Deacon Blues ||
01/03/2007 12:16 Comments ||
Top||
#7
I've got a question, then. In reality, for ANY of this to work, it has to be o.k. with our (the consumers') pocketbooks. Sure, to screw the jihadis, I'll pay a little more even than the cost of gas.
BUT, we (as consumers) don't get this "off-peak" break, do we? My electricity company just comes and reads the (totalized) meter at the end of the month. Doesn't tell when (during the 24 hour cycle) I used each of those KWh, just the total used. Sure, at the power plant, it may be "off peak", but for us consumers, it won't matter a hill of beans.
And, I don't believe that garbage about them not needing ANY new power plants to charge these plug-ins until 80+% of the cars are plug-ins. ANY add'l plug-in (at least at my house) will require additional power. I guess in theory, I wouldn't stop by the gas station as frequently (which, in theory, would lower their electric demand for the pumps), but I'd assume it would be a NET increase in demand, as I'd be "plugging in" a LOT more than the gas station would decrease by me NOT pumping gas? Is that logical?
I'm all for doing what we can to get off foreign oil. But, as others here more eloquent than i have stated, it WILL take a mix of options to do that (long term) and short term will require INCREASED domestic production (of oil). Heck, you add in tar sands (oil), and POOF, Canada of all places becomes the world's SECOND LARGEST proven reserve right behind Saudi (and far outpacing any of the other ME Countries).
Posted by: BA ||
01/03/2007 14:06 Comments ||
Top||
#8
And, Jonathon's right too. That doesn't even start to take into account the "cost" of all those old/spent batteries a few years from now.
One of my parents' friends hopped in on the "electric car" fad when it first started. She bought one of the first Honda Insights. Of course, they didn't tell you that the battery was shot by 60k miles, and whammo, cost $10,000 to replace! That's the cost (back then) of a stripped down Civic, which would (almost) get the same milage, but you didn't have to pay for it twice (once for the Insight, then almost a full second cost for a new battery), and it would last well past 200k miles.
Posted by: BA ||
01/03/2007 14:09 Comments ||
Top||
#9
The crux of the article is that there is a lot of unused base load (enough to power 84% of the USA's 220 million vehicles) at night that is maintained (at an economic loss) that plugin hybrids can use to power up and eliminate most of the gasoline used by the USA.
Let's face it, you do not pay $2.25/gallon for gas. Just this year the US is spending at least $150 billion in the muslim world (That's $34/ barrel of all oil imports or $137/barrel on the mideast oil imports). In addition, the mideast's political and religious problems already raise the price of oil from around $10/barrel, in a free arket, to today's $60/barrel. That is money that we would not have to waste if we imported no oil from them.
Lithium ion batteries (as ref in the article) do not use heavy metals (Li, Ti, Mn, Fe in some combination). They do not use sulfuric acid. Some are even in solid form (acrilamide?).
Plug in hybrids can be useful to smooth peak power demands because the cars plugged in the garage can supply power back to the grid on hot summer days. That also means fewer peak load power plants. Even at 20% conversion loss, it's still much cheaper to buy off peak power at 5 cents and sell it back at 10 cents or more (it's peak demand). It is a matter of communication links and an inverter.
The biggest hurdles are cost and battery life. Most batteries last 5 years, but newer Li ion tech are good for 20,000 cycles and still retain 85% capacity. 20K cycles is 55 years of daily charge/discharge cycles. A 35KWh batterypack (at pilot production) cost $14,000. A plug in hybrid like a Prius needs 5KWh ($2,000 battery cost, 50 cents electricity at 10 cents/KWh, 25 cents at off peak rates) to go 25 miles. A mid sized sedan needs less than 10KWh.
Like I said earlier, it's much cheaper to give every new car a battery pack (12 million X $4K for a 10KWh battery = $48 billion) than to blow 4 times that each year just on the USA's mideast governmental spending, not even counting robber baron's price for oil and billions on home security. Best to spend it on domestic growth an completely isolate the muslims from our economic, political, and demographic system.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 14:52 Comments ||
Top||
#10
Until the hybrid replacement battery cost comes way down, the only useluf thing i can see them for is to clearly identify the treehuggers so you can either tailgate them or get right in front so the diesel exhaust from your 1 ton dually commuter truck can really p!ss them off. and a hybrid suv is almost as oxymoronic (IMHO)as moderate muslim.
#11
BA, you can get off peak pricing today. It requires installation of a (more expensive) meter that records power usage and time. Industrial users have it. Most homeowners do not. While you would use additional power, a plugin would use it at night, when power plants are below capacity and losing money. Therefore it is also a more efficient use of our power plant resources to have plugin hybrids. Better efficiency = lower total unit cost (cents/KWh).
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 15:08 Comments ||
Top||
#12
10,000 miles/year at 25 miles/gallon:
Gasoline cost at $2.50 gallon: $1000
10,000 miles/year at .4KWh/mile:
5¢/KWh Off peak electricity: $200$800/year
10¢/KWh electricity: $400
10,000 miles/year at 25 miles/gallon:
Gasoline cost at $2.50 gallon: $1000
10KWh battey ($4000) amortized over 15 years: about $300 year.
Savings in American lives, societal well being, and economic growth: Priceless.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 15:19 Comments ||
Top||
#13
5¢/KWh Off peak electricity: $200/year.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 15:19 Comments ||
Top||
#14
Or we could just conquer western Iran, Iraq, Kuwait and northwestern "Saudi" Arabia and take the oil. Heck, it would be self-financing.
About two years ago I came across a link to a very clever engineer (in the SW USA, I think) who was developing high performance electric power trains for cars and who had on his site either papers on energy leveling by car battery or links to the same. Do you have the link to him by any chance?
Did he morph into Tesla Motors? (They have quite a few job openings, btw.)
#16
Don't know the guy or much about Tesla Motors. Even though I've read they have the FASTEST prodction sportscar, it uses thousands of old style AA NiMH batteries that last 2-3 years. I also can't justify $100K+ for the average Joe. A more interesting example is Phoenix Motorcars who are developing 130 and 250 mile SUVs using Altair Nanotechnologies Lithium ion batteries. Even then, until batteries are less than $100/kWH (if ever), I believe small battery hybrids that use electricity for 80% of the miles driven are the way to go.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 17:09 Comments ||
Top||
#17
Tesla Motors says it uses 500 cycle Li-ion batteries: Li-Ion batteries are good for 500 complete charge/discharge cycles. One cycle consists of discharging the pack from 100% state of charge (SOC) to 0% SOC. ... If a driver continues to drive 50 miles every day and recharges every night, then after 5 days they would complete the equivalent of one charge/discharge cycle.
Hopefully they will soon upgrade to the new generation Li-ion batteries.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 17:23 Comments ||
Top||
#18
For Gearheads on something less than a Hollywood star's budget, the Toyota FT-HS Toyota envisions that punch to be a rear-wheel-drive Hybrid Sports Concept (HSC) that develops 400 horsepower. "It's a new kind of sports car for the 21st century," adds Hunter. "Eco and emotion in a sports car concept with a performance target of 0-60 mph in about 4 seconds and a price tag in the mid-$30,000 range."
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 17:41 Comments ||
Top||
#19
What percentage of US energy consumption is consumed by personal transporation?
Something to think about: Even if we assume the availability of highly time and energy efficient mass transportation, I doubt we would save enough to really fix things. I doubt in the real world there will ever be highly time-efficient mass transportation. You have to get that back by using less energy-efficient means to get you where you are going quickly. Sorry, one or the other, not both! And time spent with your finger up your a$$ is not economically productive. I think we're screwed. The only answer is more domestic production of oil.
Deep thought: If the US annexed Iran, would oil produced there and shipped here be considered "domestic"? :-)
#20
Ed, well, that's still about 10 years of life if you drive 13K miles/year.
Got it! 19Sep03 NYT article. I had to mount my Windows partition to dig out a copy I'd saved. I could post it somewhere if you're interested or mail it to you.
It's AC Propulsion and the guy's name is Alan Cocconi. He was a founding engineer on the EV1 project.
They recently gave a paper at the ZEV Technology Symposium. It's a pdf, on slide 24 he talks about the company's eBox with a 35 KW Li Ion battery. 3 cents/mile energy cost, 30 cents per mile battery cost (!!?? I would like to have heard his remarks on that slide!)
#21
The US uses about 140 billion gallons of gasoline/year or 5.0 trillion kWH. That's 3.5 trillion miles at 25 miles/gal (US fleet avg). Diesel not taken into account as most use is commercial (40 billion gals/year). Total US energy consumption is 100 billion BTUs or 29 trillion kWH. Gasoline = 17% of total energy use.
The rub is that gasoline engines are about 20% efficienct and uses high priced fuel. At 25 miles/gallon (US fleet average). Thats 10C/mile or 1.4 kWH/mile. An electric car of average weight will only require .25kWH/mile (Phoenix Motors SUV requires .27kWH/mile). A coal fired plant generates electricity at 3.5C/kWH and can be delivered at 6-8C/kWH (24 hour avg rate). A little higher (regulations) for a nuclear plant. So to go 1 mile assume it requires .30kWh (w/ convserion losses) at 8¢ kWH gives a electric cost of 2.4¢/mile vs 10¢/mile for the gasoline car.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 19:07 Comments ||
Top||
#22
Gorb, I also think mass transportation is a waste of Americans' time (therefore money) except in the most dense cities.
While I advocated on Sept 12 to take the Saudi oil fields, kick out the Arabs and turn Arabia into one big killing field for any muslims who wanted jihad (while plugging the US' biggest vulnerability and make billions $ in the process), that is not going to happen with any conceivable political party with a chance at power. Energy independence and smarter use of the resources we have is the next best alternative.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 19:15 Comments ||
Top||
#23
#3: Further, those plug-ins that are left connected to an electrical socket after being fully charged can substitute for expensive natural gas by providing electricity from their batteries back to the grid
Am I missing something or is this as stupid as it sounds?
Nope, you're not missing a thing, batteries store DC (Direct Current) which cannot go back into the power lines, (Massive shorts, transformer fireworks, big damage) whoever said that is a total Idiot, and doesn't understand electricity one little bit.
Inverters are required to convert DC back to AC (And have huge losses doing the double converting first to DC, then back to AC)
Posted by: Redneck Jim ||
01/03/2007 19:24 Comments ||
Top||
#24
I think 10 years is "optimistic". For a standard Li-ion I would give it 3-5 years before shelling out $15-20K for another pack. That's way to short and expensive. The new nanotech batteries (20K cycles) have the problem solved for a little decrease in energy density. It could even mean swapping in your battery pack each time you buy a new car and then passing the battery pack to your grandkid.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 19:27 Comments ||
Top||
#25
That's $15-20K or more depending on the range for a battery only car. $4k or less for a plugin hybrid.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 19:29 Comments ||
Top||
#26
Small inverters have 90% efficiency. Larger ones 95% efficiency. GT 3.0 Grid-Tie Inverterhas >94% peak and average efficiency.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 19:33 Comments ||
Top||
#27
Unless it returns me time and money, I'm not going to cycle my precious battery by plugging it into the grid. If the idea was so great, everyone would have a battery and an inverter already.
Also, looking at #21, it seems like that at best we could save (I'm guessing!) 50% of 17%, or about 9% on total US energy consumption at huge cost to convenience and productive time. Not worth it, except for the loss of petrodollars to F-ing terrorists and terrorist states.
The ability to work from home and reliable mass delivery of things like groceries and other such commodities is the answer, I think.
#28
The whole idea is to store cheap power and sell expensive power. Unless you have batteries that can take thousands of cycles, it's not worth the cost. Right now you pay a HUGE subsidy on the oil you import. But you do not pay it at the pump. You pay it on your bi-weekly tax deductions so unlikely to factor that into the pump price you pay.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 20:07 Comments ||
Top||
#29
Sounds to me like hydrogen and fuel cells are the way to go.
#30
Most of the Mideast oil patch is within a horseshoe shaped area encompassing the Northern most section of Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait and Iran. (Only 15% of Iraq has been fully explored for oil deposits) US occupation of same would not put US troops in the position of taking ambush casualties, because the patch would have to be depopulated of locals; much of the oil patch work could be done using cheap (non-Muslim) Indian, Chinese, and Philipino contract workers.
Is my car worth more than the economic interests of millions of Persian Gulf savages? No, the dirt on the bottom of my tires is worth more.
#32
It's got nothing to do with energy. We don't have an energy problem. We've got a petroleum problem until we adopt SS3350's attitude (Something I don't recommend.) We can generate all the energy we need from domestic sources. It just won't be low cost, easy to use, easily transported petroleum.
#35
The Tesla 2 will be a $50-70K 300 mile range sedan available in 2009. The Tesla 3 a mid $30K sedan. That's more like it, but didn't get a time line for that.
Posted by: ed ||
01/03/2007 21:50 Comments ||
Top||
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
