Criticism of COIN by a USMC veteran. Conclusion below, article at link.
What General McChrystal, Sec Def Gates and President Obama need to remember is that they are sworn by oath to defend this country and our people - not protect the civilian population of another country or rebuild their country with our tax dollars and the blood of our children!
Any member of the armed forces who before or in the presence of the enemyâ
(1) runs away;
(2) shamefully abandons, surrenders, or delivers up any command, unit, place, or military property which it is his duty to defend;
(3) through disobedience, neglect, or intentional misconduct endangers the safety of any such command, unit, place, or military property;
(4) casts away his arms or ammunition;
(5) is guilty of cowardly conduct;
(6) quits his place of duty to plunder or pillage;
(7) causes false alarms in any command, unit, or place under control of the armed forces; (8) willfully fails to do his utmost to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy any enemy troops, combatants, vessels, aircraft, or any other thing, which it is his duty so to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy; or
(9) does not afford all practicable relief and assistance to any troops, combatants, vessels, or aircraft of the armed forces belonging to the United States or their allies when engaged in battle;
shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.
How about at least getting the law changed or enforce it.
#3
That criticism gives more heat than light. Afghanistan has proven itself a natural breeding ground for Islamic terrorism -- the only armed foreigners Afghans will tolerate are jihadis from other countries. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are basically equivalent in that regard. Leaving Afghanistan to its own devices will generate more terrorism in the end. (The Malaya & the Philippine insurgencies radically differ from Afghanistan. There never was a question of those countries exporting their violence.) Doing as we are doing is generating more American and Afghan casualties while the Taliban is partly supported by diversion of American aid. Vastly stepping up American forces for many years into the future (i.e., colonization) is the only thing that might work, and the electorate won't support it -- an opinion the original article actually agrees with.
#4
The President clearly has made a choice. Instead of adopting a strategy to advance or retreat, he is having them dance in place. It must feel like some kind of cruel torture to our troops there.
Posted by: Richard of Oregon ||
10/27/2009 13:27 Comments ||
Top||
Have you ever stumbled on an oxymoron so stunning that it takes your breath away? Try coupling this with a case of chutzpah so revealing that the lack of shame on the part of those involved serves as prima fasci evidence that their elite cultural isolation has rendered them incapable of critical thinking.
Behold the "Independent Journalism Tax."
In order to preserve independent journalism in the age of the Internet, a national Fund for Local News should be created with money the FCC now collects from or could impose on telecom users, television and radio broadcast licensees, or Internet service providers.
This is the key recommendation buried on page 91 of a 100 page report issued last week titled "The Reconstruction of American Journalism" by Leonard Downie, Jr. Vice President of the Washington Post, and Michael Schudson, a professor at the Columbia School of Journalism.
Lamenting the demise of the "hegemony that near-monopoly metropolitan newspapers enjoyed during the last third of the twentieth century," these guardians of journalistic integrity recommend that your tax dollars be distributed to their brethren by "Local News Fund Council boards comprised of journalists, educators, and ACORN community leaders" to make sure that "advocacy journalism is not endangered." I take it the Weekly Standard is not included ...
Juxtapose this learned study with some recent poll data collected by the Pew Research Center.
Only 29 percent of 1,506 adults surveyed said news organizations generally get the facts straight. The facts! Sixty percent said the press is biased, up from 45 percent in 1985. Just 26 percent said that news organizations are careful their reporting is not politically biased.
The market appears to be speaking about how it views "advocacy journalism" as practiced by the likes of the money-losing Washington Post, reduced to bragging that its decline in circulation may finally be starting to slow. Kept alive by its profitable Kaplan division, one can only marvel at what sort of independence Leonard Downie would expect to maintain living on the dole. Reporters would have lots of company, of course, joining the ranks of bankers, car manufacturers, ethanol producers, and climate scientists who rely on the public weal for their daily bread. But independence? When was the last time you heard taxpayer-subsidized NPR bite the hand that feeds it?
The amazing thing about Downie & Schudson's study is that the vast majority of the pages are actually devoted to describing the amazing ferment being generated by new news-gathering organizations empowered by the low barriers to entry afforded by the Web. These are supported by a bewildering array of new business models, all interacting in a dance of discovery and renewal that the authors seem to mistake for the last days of Pompeii. What clearly irks them is the lack of professional training and credentials that they believe are required to turn college kids who aren't sharp enough to study medicine, law, finance, or engineering into paeans of virtue imbued with an ethos of Olympian detachment and moral rectitude.
Gimme a break. Have you ever read a newspaper article about an event you personally attended wondering which other planet the reporter actually visited that day? Have you ever been interviewed by a journalist with a major newspaper who had any subject matter expertise on the material he was covering? Were you fooled for one minute that he hadn't already written his story and wasn't just looking for sound bites that would fit his preconceived notions? Did you notice how lazy he was about tracking down a diversity of independent sources and how easily he could be guided into a self-referring circle of cronies? And these are the professionals?
At least when you read a blog you know what axe the author is grinding. Who needs an editor with a 29% success rate to check the facts when you know that ten more bloggers are poised to pounce? And thanks to the Internet we can all get our own hands on the same source material the reporter is reading and decide for ourselves. Case in point is the Downie & Schudson study. Go read the mainstream press reports on it then Google up the original document. The contrast is illuminating.
In the current era of single party rule, is there any chance that this further intrusion of the government into our lives might actually come true? Might we one day be forced to pay a tax every time we make a cell phone call to make sure the Press Room in the White House is stuffed with even more reporters eager to credulously swallow whatever nonsense comes out of the President's mouth? Could truly independent newspapers be forced to compete with government subsidized lapdogs like, say, truly independent banks or car companies?
Posted by: Fred ||
10/27/2009 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[0 views]
Top|| File under:
#2
Have journalists considered formally switching to prostitution? It's a cleaner, more honorable line of work and they won't have shut their eyes nearly as much to what's going on in front of (or behind) them.
Posted by: ed ||
10/27/2009 0:39 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Not possible - even whores have a little honor and dignity.
And there are some things a whore won't do - unlike Journalists.
Particularly Journalist trained at the Columbia School of Journalism.
#7
college kids who aren't sharp enough to study medicine, law, finance, or engineering into paeans of virtue
Ah, but you stopped the list of majors far too soon! You should have included things like recreation, womyn's studies, and even education on that list.
#10
Were you fooled for one minute that he hadn't already written his story and wasn't just looking for sound bites that would fit his preconceived notions?
In my civilian career, I manage the electric and natural gas contracts for my place of employ. About a month after I started, Enron went bankrupt. I did a little number-crunching and quickly realized that the contract was unfavorable to us, so under the provisions of the agreement, we terminated the contract. A reporter from the Chicago Tribune called me, wanting a tale of anguish and woe about how Enron tanking had utterly ruined us. I replied that their demise had actually saved us a cool $300K. You could hear the disappointment in the reporter's voice.
We often look at the larger picture of politics, society, corruption and governance, ignoring the most intimate communities and places where we live our lives. For most people, it is the village, the small hamlet; and for us, the urbanites, it is the town, the city. And the quality of the place we live in is determined by the quality of life.
There are many ways to measure the quality of life, and there are universal standards by which cities and communities around the world are compared. We all know how low we are on many measurements, from governance to human development, which is a sad reflection on those that have governed us and continue to govern us -- the political-bureaucratic combine. How much we care about knowing and acting to mend things about our towns and cities may be gauged from the fact that these issues are totally missing from our media and socio-political discourses.
In search of the Taliban, Talibanisation and the proliferating madrassa network, I had the opportunity to visit three towns last week, though briefly -- Rajanpur, Dera Ghazi Khan and Multan. I must admit my failure in confirming the manufactured political facts about Southern Punjab. But I challenge the ruling groups -- the PMLN, which is in power in Punjab, and the bureaucracy -- on what I did confirm.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred ||
10/27/2009 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[6 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan
#1
The ruination of modern-day Detroit and that of Dera Ghazi Khan have a chilling resemblance, and some of the same underlying causes.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
