Hi there, !
Today Sat 08/25/2007 Fri 08/24/2007 Thu 08/23/2007 Wed 08/22/2007 Tue 08/21/2007 Mon 08/20/2007 Sun 08/19/2007 Archives
Rantburg
533573 articles and 1861532 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 101 articles and 341 comments as of 4:17.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
Aksa Martyrs: We'll no longer honor agreements with Israel
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
4 00:00 Zenster [4] 
2 00:00 Whiskey Mike [] 
4 00:00 trailing wife [1] 
8 00:00 Red Dawg [1] 
8 00:00 Zenster [10] 
0 [] 
0 [] 
4 00:00 SteveS [1] 
2 00:00 Ebbang Uluque6305 [1] 
7 00:00 Deacon Blues [] 
2 00:00 Goober Slinemp6164 [] 
3 00:00 Zenster [] 
0 [] 
2 00:00 trailing wife [] 
21 00:00 ed [] 
1 00:00 M. Murcek [] 
1 00:00 Gretle Tojo1693 [4] 
3 00:00 Nimble Spemble [2] 
1 00:00 Zenster [] 
5 00:00 Zenster [] 
5 00:00 anonymous5089 [4] 
1 00:00 Unutle McGurque8861 [7] 
2 00:00 Frank G [] 
0 [1] 
0 [6] 
0 [6] 
2 00:00 Frank G [6] 
2 00:00 newc [4] 
3 00:00 mojo [2] 
6 00:00 Zenster [1] 
3 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
0 [1] 
14 00:00 Fred O'Grunion [] 
2 00:00 JosephMendiola [] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
5 00:00 GK [2]
1 00:00 Red Dawg []
6 00:00 Red Dawg []
1 00:00 Red Dawg [2]
9 00:00 BA []
0 [1]
0 []
5 00:00 BA []
19 00:00 BA []
0 []
5 00:00 BA [2]
4 00:00 BA []
1 00:00 wxjames []
6 00:00 Red Dawg [1]
1 00:00 Zenster [1]
0 []
2 00:00 rhodesiafever []
9 00:00 tu3031 [1]
0 [7]
2 00:00 USN, Ret. [4]
2 00:00 Red Dawg [1]
0 [1]
0 [6]
0 [6]
0 [5]
4 00:00 BA [6]
0 [4]
2 00:00 Mike [1]
Page 3: Non-WoT
0 []
1 00:00 Gary and the Samoyeds [5]
9 00:00 Zenster [6]
2 00:00 Zenster []
0 []
2 00:00 BA []
0 [3]
6 00:00 Excalibur []
0 []
6 00:00 Zenster [2]
4 00:00 Bulldog [1]
3 00:00 trailing wife []
1 00:00 Bobby []
0 [1]
11 00:00 Frank G []
5 00:00 ed []
7 00:00 OregonGuy []
2 00:00 BigEd []
1 00:00 Frank G []
0 [4]
Page 4: Opinion
8 00:00 BA [1]
1 00:00 john frum [7]
10 00:00 Zenster [3]
0 [4]
4 00:00 Punky Uleck8700 []
0 [1]
3 00:00 twobyfour [4]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
3 00:00 mojo []
4 00:00 BA [4]
1 00:00 mojo [1]
4 00:00 gorb []
3 00:00 john frum []
6 00:00 Zenster [3]
0 [1]
4 00:00 eLarson []
18 00:00 SteveS []
3 00:00 wxjames []
3 00:00 wxjames []
2 00:00 Zenster [2]
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Al-Q threatens Justin Timberlake!
David Beckham and Justin Timberlake are the targets of an alleged Al-Qaeda murder plot. A chilling internet video, which has been posted on YouTube, brands Becks, 32, and JT, 26, as criminal influences on young Muslims. Fellow footballers Wayne Rooney and Thierry Henry, as well as rapper P Diddy, are also mentioned.

The warning footage was posted by a Glasgow-based website named after Al-Qaeda that encourages attacks on Westerners.

Who to root for, who to root for? I'm so conflicted.
Ya know, this might be the only way to open the eyes of some on the left as to what the threat really is. Course, they'd most likely blame Bush.
Posted by: Mike || 08/22/2007 06:07 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda

#1  Stopped clock.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 6:18 Comments || Top||

#2  Qui bono? Justin Timberlake cd sales! Who owns Justin Timberlake's record company, Jive Records? Sony BMG! Chief Executive Officer Rolf Schmidt-Holtz = former editor of Gruner + Jahr/neocon/Bilderberger Group/Hitler Diaries False Flag experts Stern! 666 times 23 carry the square root of Pi = profits! Israel! Cheney! Fire doesn't melt steel! I question the timing! No blood for N-Sync!

/the Democratic House leadership
Posted by: Excalibur || 08/22/2007 9:19 Comments || Top||

#3  Flood of 'B' list celebrities angling for Al-Q targeting in 3...2...1...
Posted by: Pappy || 08/22/2007 9:57 Comments || Top||

#4  Sorry Ex, President of Jive is Barry Weiss- Rolf has nothing to do with Justin (except when we totally GANKED N*Sync off of BMG. Too hilarious.)
Posted by: Free Radical || 08/22/2007 11:15 Comments || Top||

#5  Free Radical, I demand you explain to us how it is that you know what label Justin Timberlake is on!
Posted by: Mike N. || 08/22/2007 11:36 Comments || Top||

#6  Pappy - lol!
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861 || 08/22/2007 11:42 Comments || Top||

#7  Who is Justin Timberlake? Never heard of him.
Posted by: Deacon Blues || 08/22/2007 11:52 Comments || Top||

#8  Excalibur, have you been taking writing lessons from Joe?
Posted by: kilowattkid || 08/22/2007 12:25 Comments || Top||

#9  Here ya go Deacon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dmVU08zVpA&mode=related&search=
Posted by: Beavis || 08/22/2007 12:42 Comments || Top||

#10  Excal, you forgot the two footlong subs.
Posted by: Mike N. || 08/22/2007 13:27 Comments || Top||

#11  Who is Justin Timberlake?

Who cares?
Posted by: JohnQC || 08/22/2007 13:38 Comments || Top||

#12  (except when we totally GANKED N*Sync off of BMG. Too hilarious.)

Ooooh -- that sounds like a story! Can you share it, Free Radical?
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 13:44 Comments || Top||

#13  Mike N- "It's a tough job, but someone's gotta do it." Lol!
TW- have a seat next to me in the O-Club tonight and I'll tell you. It's a hoot.
Posted by: Free Radical || 08/22/2007 17:10 Comments || Top||

#14  Tough to blame them on this one...
Posted by: tu3031 || 08/22/2007 17:25 Comments || Top||

#15  Brit news also mentions Posh Spice's hubby. I gotta ask why and what relevance/value do these male celebrities have for Radical Islam and Dubya-WOT in general??? OTOH, compare wid RUMORMILLNEWS Netter > VICK'S Case? > POTUS Dubya allegedly abused animals as a young man.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 08/22/2007 19:27 Comments || Top||

#16  TW! That's too funny.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike || 08/22/2007 19:28 Comments || Top||

#17  Whisky Mike, why don't you and whoever else wants to hear the story join us in the O Club? Scroll up to the yellow box in the right margin and click on it. I'm buying the first round of drinks while Free Radical relates his tale. :-D
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 19:39 Comments || Top||

#18  GREAT story, Free Radical (over at the O Club).

This one's a tough call. But, I did draw my line in the sand when they tangled with Gwen Stefani.
Posted by: BA || 08/22/2007 20:01 Comments || Top||

#19  Big deal.......I've been plotting to kill that nancy for years.
Posted by: Broadhead6 || 08/22/2007 20:10 Comments || Top||

#20  On the way!!! TW.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike || 08/22/2007 20:19 Comments || Top||

#21  Al-Qaeda Lance Bass.
Posted by: ed || 08/22/2007 20:26 Comments || Top||


Afghanistan
S Korea wants more time for hostage talks, say Taliban
South Korea has asked the Taliban for more time in talks over the fate of the remaining 19 Korean hostages held in Afghanistan, a Taliban spokesman said on Tuesday.

Talks between Taliban and Korean negotiators are deadlocked after more than a month since the Taliban kidnapped the 19 Koreans. Two of the male hostages have already been killed and the Taliban are threatening to kill the rest if the Afghan government does not free jailed rebel prisoners.

After talks last week, the Taliban freed two female captives as a gesture of goodwill, but little progress has been made since.

Korean negotiators have stressed that they have no power to persuade Kabul to free Taliban prisoners and that it is a matter for the Afghan government to decide. “The Korean delegation has said they are making all efforts to make the American and the Afghan governments agree on the release of Taliban prisoners,” said Zabihullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Taliban


Africa Horn
UN calls for peacekeepers in Somalia
(SomaliNet) The UN Security Council called on the secretary-general on Monday to begin planning for the possible deployment of UN peacekeepers to Somalia to replace an African Union force that has struggled to put troops in the chaotic country.

The push came as part of a resolution approved unanimously on Monday by the council extending the AU force's mandate for another six months and urging African states to pledge soldiers to the undermanned mission. The UN authorised the AU to send an 8 000-strong peacekeeping force to Somalia in February to calm the country after Ethiopian-backed government troops ousted a fundamentalist Islamic movement that had controlled much of the south.

But only 1,800 troops from Uganda are on the ground six months later, far fewer than the number needed to bring a lasting peace to the country. Troop deployments from other African countries have been delayed because of lack of funding and logistical help.
Nobody thought of that at the time, of course ...
The resolution, sponsored by Britain, calls on Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to begin making contingency plans for the possible deployment of UN peacekeepers to replace the African force, although it does not provide a timeline for any potential hand-over.
How about if the EU handles this one? The UN will hit the US for at least 25% of the tab, and we're a little busy elsewhere. Let's see the Euros step up.
Francois Lonseny Fall, Ban's special representative to Somalia, has said the AU's expectation is that a UN force will replace the AU troops at the end of the six months. But some Security Council countries believe there must be a peace to keep before UN troops are sent to Somalia. China's deputy UN ambassador, Liu Zhenmin, said earlier this month that "everything depends on the security situation inside the country."
Wouldn't want anyone shooting at the Mighty Uruguayans ...
South Africa's UN ambassador, Dumisani Kumalo, said on Monday the African countries on the council supported the resolution without "great enthusiasm" because they "expected the Security Council to take decisive action about the deployment of UN troops in Somalia." He said the AU is "doing the job that the UN is supposed to be doing", and doesn't have the resources to fulfil its mandate to place 8 000 troops in the country.
Posted by: || 08/22/2007 01:25 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Islamic Courts

#1  I call for a Maserati in my garage...
Posted by: M. Murcek || 08/22/2007 1:33 Comments || Top||


Africa North
Muslim Brotherhood should not be banned in Egypt: official
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:47 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Muslim Brotherhood


Africa Subsaharan
(sharia) Court tries 18 for cross-dressing
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:15 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  They're innocent - they were just practicing escaping from beseiged mosques and such.
Posted by: Glenmore || 08/22/2007 7:18 Comments || Top||

#2  Need to send this guy to this court.

http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=196845&D=2007-08-22&SO=&HC=1
Posted by: Goober Slinemp6164 || 08/22/2007 14:53 Comments || Top||


Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Kidnapped girl freed in Chechnya; kidnappers detained
Police of Chechnya's Naur district succeeded in freeing 15-year old Angelina, a resident of the Rostov region, who had been kidnapped and taken for an unknown destination in a car the other day, Dmitry Nikiforov, the chief of the press centre of the operational group of the Russian Interior Ministry in the Chechen Republic, told Itar-Tass on Tuesday. Police detained the car in Naur populated locality. The hostage and the abductors were in the car. They are 21-year old Khizir, 19-year old Adam and Ibragim, and 20-year old Adam. They were taken to the police station for investigation, while the underage girl was handed over to her relatives, Nikiforov said.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Chechen Republic of Ichkeria


Europe
Bosnia revokes 500 citizenships granted to foreigners
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:43 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda


Kosovo: Serbian girl raped in Gracanica
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:35 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  So, how's it different from Brussels or Stockholm?
Posted by: gromgoru || 08/22/2007 8:20 Comments || Top||

#2  The difference is that the Serbs had sense enough to fight these bastards and actually had them on the run until the UN/NATO/US intervened. And now, according to the article, ethnic Albanians (read muzzies) are threatening violence if the Russians and Serbs are successful in blocking their aspirations for total independence from Serbia for Kosovo which is historically a Serbian province. So my question is how will the NATO forces in Kosovo fare against the Kosovo Liberation Army? My guess is probably not as well.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 08/22/2007 14:50 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
Report: Tenet Failed to Prepare for al-Qaeda Threat
Former CIA Director George Tenet did not marshal his agency's resources to respond to the recognized threat posed by al-Qaeda before the Sept. 11 attacks, the agency's inspector general concluded in a long-classified report released today. The report, which Congress ordered released under a law signed by President Bush this month, also faulted the intelligence community for failing to have "a documented, comprehensive approach" to battling al-Qaeda.

Tenet, now a professor at Georgetown University, heavily criticized the report as "flat wrong" in a lengthy statement, saying the judgments are contradicted by a report issued by the agency watchdog just a month before the 2001 attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. CIA Director Michael Hayden also said he did not want to release the report, saying it "would distract officers serving their country on the front lines of a global conflict. It will, at a minimum, consume time and attention revisiting ground that is already well plowed."
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda

#1  But I heard on the news this morning that Michael Scheuer is also critical - as if he was (and is) blameless....
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi || 08/22/2007 6:39 Comments || Top||

#2  DER SPEIGEL > CIA REVEALS ITS ERRORS PRIOR TO 9-11. USCIA knew two of the 9-11 hijackers were in America before 9-11 but failed to inform the FBI. Forgot Muhammed Atta, etal. was at Penn State.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 08/22/2007 20:46 Comments || Top||

#3  POPULISTAMERICA > YOU ARE DESTROYING AMERIKA - YES, YOU. D *** ng it, we want to make it absolutely positively undeniably categorically unequivocally clear to the Amer people -------------------------------------------------------------???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????.................................and don't youse fergit it!
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 08/22/2007 20:51 Comments || Top||


O'Bama: No Military Solution in Iraq
Democrat Barack Obama said Tuesday the recent increase in American troops in Iraq may well have helped tamp down violence, but he insisted there is no military solution to the country's problems and U.S. forces should be redeployed soon.

Obama spoke a day after his main Democratic presidential rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, made similar comments. She said the tactics of the short-term troop increase were working but political progress did not seem to be in sight and the U.S. should begin bringing some troops home. Obama said in a telephone briefing, "If we put 30,000 additional troops into Baghdad, it will quell some of the violence short term. I don't think there is any doubt about that." But that won't solve Iraq's critical political problems, he said in the call and again later in a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

"All of our top military commanders recognize that there is no military solution in Iraq," Obama said at the VFW convention in Kansas City. "No military surge can succeed without political reconciliation and a surge of diplomacy in Iraq and the region. Iraq's leaders are not reconciling. They are not achieving political benchmarks. The only thing they seem to have agreed on is to take a vacation."
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency

#1  O'Bama: No Votes Military Solution in Iraq For Me

There, fixed that.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 1:05 Comments || Top||

#2  Back to the minors with ya, buddy. Ya don't pack the gear...
Posted by: tu3031 || 08/22/2007 2:10 Comments || Top||

#3  "...leaders are not reconciling. They are not achieving political benchmarks. The only thing they seem to have agreed on is to take a vacation."

Iraqi Parliment or American Congress?
Posted by: Bobby || 08/22/2007 6:50 Comments || Top||

#4  All of our top military commanders recognize that there is no military solution in Iraq
What the hell has he been smoking?
The surge is working and the Dems are getting desparate, trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
Posted by: Spot || 08/22/2007 8:13 Comments || Top||

#5  No military solution west of the Mississippi (circa 1830).
Posted by: Procopius2k || 08/22/2007 8:47 Comments || Top||

#6  Obama has convinced me! Convinced me that I could never, ever vote for him, that is.

If he can find time between stupid statements, I suggest he read "The Pentagon's New Map". Not only will it count as one of his nine books, it will help him understand the whole point of being in Iraq.
Posted by: SteveS || 08/22/2007 9:13 Comments || Top||

#7  Must have been "Open Mike' nite @ the 'V'.....
Posted by: USN, Ret. || 08/22/2007 13:53 Comments || Top||

#8  Military: No O'Bama solution in White House.


-how do you like that you cheese d*ck.
Posted by: Broadhead6 || 08/22/2007 14:32 Comments || Top||

#9  She said the tactics of the short-term troop increase were working but political progress did not seem to be in sight...

She's correct (much to my chagrin). There can be no progress until we remove Islam from the Iraqi political equation. What we have at the moment is a never ending battle to see which faction of Islam is the most Islamic--such a standoff guarantees that Iraq will remain firmly stuck in the 7th century.
Posted by: Crusader || 08/22/2007 16:10 Comments || Top||

#10  NPR reported during the evening rush hour report that the Surge is working.
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 19:45 Comments || Top||

#11  Jeebus, TW. I hope you'd either pulled to the side to hear that, or (if like Atlanta rush-hour traffic), you were just sittin' still.

And, I hope you made tea-time too.
Posted by: BA || 08/22/2007 19:55 Comments || Top||

#12  It was rather a shock, BA, but a nice one. And right after that the cars ahead sped up, so perhaps they were listening all to the report, too. After all, the reports have been coming thick and fast, lately -- even the Washington Post has noticed, according to the article GolfBravoUSMC posted this morning. We may be winning the battle for the home front, finally.
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 20:52 Comments || Top||

#13  I think it's just become SO obvious that the surge is winning that they can't ignore it anymore. Either that, or they're hedging bets, so that they can say they were behind the surge before it was behind them.
Posted by: BA || 08/22/2007 22:37 Comments || Top||

#14  If Izzat Ibrahim is really changing sides that's the turnng point. The second half will probably be as awful as the first half, but in reverse.
Posted by: Fred O'Grunion || 08/22/2007 23:26 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Pakistani Federal Minister blasts pro-US foreign policy
ISLAMABAD, Aug 21: Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Dr Sher Afgan Niazi on Tuesday stunned both the treasury and opposition senators when he roundly criticised the foreign policy, describing it as one of appeasement at the cost of national interests, sovereignty and honour.

He also condemned recently-passed US legislation and the derogatory statements about Pakistan made by some American presidential candidates.

Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal’s Prof Khurshid Ahmed immediately stood up to endorse most of the views expressed by the minister, and welcomed the “change of heart,” describing it as part of the change that had taken place in the wake of the July 20 landmark Supreme Court judgment.

Interestingly, taking cognizance of the strongly-worded speech of the minister, the Foreign Office reacted officially, saying that only the foreign minister’s statement would be true representation of Pakistan’s foreign policy and Pakistan’s relations with various countries.

However, not a single PPP or the PML-N lawmaker took part in the debate during which statements of US presidential candidates and a recently-approved Pakistan-specific law were severely criticised.

Commenting on the statements made in the Senate on Tuesday, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the foreign mQinister would wind up the debate on the subject on Aug 22.

Dr Niazi said in his speech that the key role Pakistan played in bringing about the downfall of the former Soviet Union was a blunder. It resulted in the emergence of a unipolar world and gave the US a licence to attack any country it wished, he said.

He said that American presidential candidates’ statements threatening Pakistan’s internal security were a reflection of the jaundiced thinking of US leaders who had forgotten lessons of history and the glorious past of Muslims.

Lashing out at the recent US law attaching strings to financial assistance to Pakistan, Dr Niazi described it as insulting and demanded that “we must return and refuse to accept such assistance”.

He said the country should learn to stand on its own feet by rejecting all foreign assistance as a proud Muslim nation.

Recounting events of the 1971 war with India and the country’s dismemberment, he said Islamabad kept waiting for the arrival of the Sixth US fleet in the Bay of Bengal as had been promised by the then US government. But the fleet never turned up, he said, adding that no good should be expected of the US in future as well.

He said while the US officials never stopped the mantra of “do more”, ignoring the fact that Islamabad had rendered tremendous sacrifices in the war on terror, the US signed a civil nuclear agreement with India, instead of Pakistan. He said while India was encouraged when it had carried out nuclear tests in 1974 and 1998, heavy sanctions were slapped on Pakistan when it conducted nuclear tests and aspersions were still being cast on nuclear assets of the country.

The minister said that events which followed the 9/11 incident proved that it was the brainchild of Jews. He said that according to holy Quran, Jews and Christians could never be friends of Muslims.

Prof Khurshid Ahmed of the MMA said that the American presidential candidates’ statements had exposed Gen Musharraf’s US-centric policies, because after staking everything, national interest, pride and sovereignty Pakistan was still accused of doing little in the so-called war on terror.

He said while the Iranian leadership had staunchly resisted the US pressure with full backing of its people, Pakistan’s military government had abjectly surrendered to the US dictates because of lack of genuine support from the people.

He accused Gen Musharraf of compromising everything on a single telephone call of the American President.

Treasury bench members Nisar Memon and Anwar Bhinder supported President Musharraf’s foreign policy, saying it was based on “ground realities”.

Dr Kausar Firdaus called for review and revision of the foreign policy, and said the government should consider withdrawing Pakistan from the so-called war on terror that had cost the country dearly in terms of losses of life and national dignity.

Senator Shahid Bugti said that an individual had put the country’s solidarity at risk only to prolong his rule.
Posted by: john frum || 08/22/2007 18:21 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  So.. the Pak defense secretary (who called for jihad on US and India) is a crazy islamist ... the parliamentary affairs minister is a crazy islamist.. the Pak information minister is a pathological liar and an islamist, the religious affairs minister (Zia's son) is a crazy islamist

Perv has got one hell of a cabinet there...
Posted by: john frum || 08/22/2007 18:31 Comments || Top||

#2  There is a consistent theme, though.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 08/22/2007 19:08 Comments || Top||

#3  I'm sure it's a coincidence
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 20:47 Comments || Top||

#4  Pakistani Federal Minister blasts pro-US foreign policy

And, lo! His blasts shall be as nothing once Uncle Sam whispers an oath.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 21:16 Comments || Top||


Bhutto urges Pakistan power-share deal soon
WASHINGTON - Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhuttoon Tuesday urged President Pervez Musharraf to present a power-sharing reform package by the end of August, saying her party was becoming jittery with approaching elections.

“I have shared with General Musharraf that my party is getting very upset, because elections are around the corner, and that, by the end of this month, we really need to know where we stand,” she told the American PBS television network. “We either have a package or we don’t have a package,” she said. ”And if we have a package, well, then, we need the measures that we’ve agreed upon to come into play.”

Bhutto said if she was not able to cut a deal with Musharraf, she still intended to return to Pakistan and campaign for her party and join other moderate political parties “to try and bring about a transition. “I hope it doesn’t come to a breakdown in the negotiations between General Musharraf and the PPP. But, at the end of the day, we can’t afford to be contaminated by his unpopularity without getting the price for democracy,” she said.
Posted by: || 08/22/2007 01:08 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Gee, it's Nancy Pelosi or do my eyes deceive me?
Posted by: Gretle Tojo1693 || 08/22/2007 16:23 Comments || Top||


Forward Bloc wants Taslima deported
LUCKNOW — The Forward Bloc (FB), a constituent of the Left alliance supporting the United Progressive Alliance at the Centre, has come out openly against the stay of controversial Bangladeshi writer Taslima Nasreen in Kolkata.

West Bengal Assembly Deputy Speaker B.P. Ghosh, who received a memorandum from nine Muslim organisations here yesterday, said that the FB would press for her deportation from India so that nobody should be allowed to hurt the feelings of other people. Naib Imam Eidgah and member of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, Maulana Khalid Rashid led the delegation of Muslim organisations, including the Jamat-e-Islami, the Ulema Council of India and the Jamiat-e-Ulema, to demand the cancellation of Taslima’s extended visa in India.

Ghosh, who was here to meet the Uttar Pradesh Assembly Speaker Sukhdeo Rajbhar, said: “Secular society does not allow attack on other religions and people are free to have their own faith. I will forward the memorandum to the government for action. I will ask the Centre to pack her off to Bangaldesh.”

"People should be cautious in their free expression so that it does not lead to communal trouble," he added.
Fred noted elsewhere tonight how freedom of thought is the most essential and fundamental freedom: protect that and all your other freedoms follow. Taslima should have, in a country that calls itself a 'democracy', the right to be insulting to another religion, as long as she understands that she might be insulted in turn. What the folks in this article want isn't the right and opportunity to respond, they want her dead. To the extent they can kill/silence/deport her, India isn't yet the democracy that it needs to be.
Posted by: || 08/22/2007 01:02 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  Questions are starting top be raised about the deafening silence from women and human rights activists over the assault by a elected state representative on Taslima during her book launch.

These same activists defended free speech loudly when a coalition of Christians and Hindus protested an art exhibition that featured Jesus Christ with semen dripping from his penis into a toilet and the Hindu goddess Durga, with a fetus emerging from her vagina.

Incidently, the state representative, a muslim, has historical ties to those that backed Hyderabad's accession to Pakistan. He has built an office tower that 'coincidently' overlooks a DRDO (military research) facility and has a record of asking detailed technical questions in parliament on Indian defence matters. Many think he is an ISI spy.
Posted by: john frum || 08/22/2007 8:58 Comments || Top||

#2  nobody should be allowed to hurt the feelings of other people

How about Justin Timberlake's feelings?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 08/22/2007 15:38 Comments || Top||

#3  People should be cautious in their free expression so that it does not lead to communal trouble

Sounds like the justification for speech codes on most college campuses.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 08/22/2007 16:09 Comments || Top||


Bajaur jirga gives Taliban four days
KHAR: A tribal jirga on Tuesday gave a four-day deadline to the Taliban in Bajuar Agency to take a final decision on their peace agreement with the government. A 120-member jirga including Bajaur political agents, MNA Maulana Sadiq and Senator Maulana Rashid gave the deadline in a meeting at the agency headquarters. The jirga convened the meeting due to increasing incidents of explosions and rocket attacks at security checkposts in the agency. The Taliban and the local administration had signed a peace agreement a few months ago. Jirga head Malik Aziz said that the Taliban had sought till August 25 to take a final decision on the peace agreement.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under: Taliban


Orakzai elders want FC men's release
Orakzai Agency elders told Bakka Khel and Jani Khel tribesmen on Thursday to release three abducted Frontier Constabulary (FC) soldiers within a week, or face action against their tribes.

Malik Wahid Ali, Malik Iltaf Hussain, Malik Gul Shan Ali and Malik Kinan Ali appealed to the NWFP governor, the chief minister and the FC chief to help in the release of the FC men. “They were kidnapped on July 31 from a bus on their way back to Saidgi Bannu to resume their duties after spending time in their village,” Malik Wahid Ali told a news conference at the Peshawar Press Club.

He said the kidnappers stopped the bus at gunpoint in the Bakka Khel area. Wahid said five of the nine FC soldiers escaped, and one - Shah Hussain - was shot dead. Irshad Ali, Najmul Hasan and Sameen Ali were taken hostage. “We have information that the soldiers are now in the custody of the Jan Khel Wazir tribe,” he said.

The elder said that the kidnappers had contacted them through Umer Usman and demanded Rs 1 million and release of five of their tribesmen arrested by the government in ransom. “The kidnappers are not Taliban. They are local militants,” said Wahid.

Other elders said they had held jirgas with the district coordination officer (DCO), Frontier Region (FR) Bannu officials and others on the issue, but it was futile. “We have another jirga tomorrow [Wednesday],” they said. They said they wanted to resolve the issue peacefully.

The Orakzai elders said if the men weren’t released within a week, they “are capable of taking hostage Bakka Khel and Jani Khel tribespeople who live in our area”.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under: Taliban


Alleged Al Qaeda suspect's release seen as blow to Pakistan
The release of a man suspected of links to Al Qaeda could undermine Pakistan’s claims of winning the battle to contain terrorism within its borders, analysts and experts said on Tuesday. Pakistan’s Supreme Court heard on Monday that Mohammed Naeem Noor Khan, who is alleged to have been an Al Qaeda computer expert, had been released without charge after three years in custody. Khan, who was arrested on July 12, 2004 in Lahore, is now at home in Karachi, his lawyer Babar Awan told AFP.

Shortly after his arrest, Pakistani investigators said interrogations of Khan and searches of his computer files and email records led them to an active worldwide Al Qaeda ring that was plotting fresh attacks in Britain, Pakistan and the United States. They said Khan helped Al Qaeda by developing secret codes and helping its operatives send encrypted email to each other.

A senior official involved in the investigation told AFP, “He [Khan] was a key figure in 2004 Al Qaeda plots to stage new terror strikes in the US, Great Britain and Kenya and his arrest led to the capture of an Al Qaeda sleeper cell in great Britain. But there was no serious attempt made by the intelligence agency which had him in custody for the past three years to initiate any legal proceedings.”

According to the official, who did not want to be identified, Khan could have been tried under the Security of Pakistan Act or for waging war against other countries using Pakistan as a base. “But when the Supreme Court started hearing the petition early this year, it was too late to initiate any legal proceedings against Khan,” he said.

Khan’s case is among several where people arrested on suspicion of plotting attacks on Western targets and helping Al Qaeda have later been released by courts. Awan said he had petitioned the Supreme Court in an attempt to discover his client’s whereabouts, part of a case taken by relatives and rights groups on behalf of hundreds of missing people allegedly abducted and held without charge by intelligence agencies. “I told the Supreme Court that so far the government had not indicted Khan and no case had been registered against him,” Awan said.

In another case, heart specialist Akmal Waheed and his brother, orthopaedic surgeon Arshad Waheed, were jailed for seven years in March 2005 for alleged Al Qaeda links. Their convictions were set aside last year.

Analysts said these and other cases undermined the credibility of the government’s claims to be making progress in curtailing terrorist activities within Pakistan’s borders. “It shows that the real culprits are free to do whatever they want and the authorities are catching innocent people to prove their efficiency,” said defence analyst Talat Masood. “It weakens Pakistan’s case when it says that we are fighting terrorism and then it arrests people who are not genuinely involved suspects,” he added. “Catching the wrong people also gives big leverage to militants who are active in the country. That is why there is so much cynicism against the war on terror and many people are now saying its a farce.”

Political analyst Hasan Askari said Pakistani intelligence officials’ claims of success in conquering the Al Qaeda threat were running out of steam because of the inability to prove charges against suspects. “In the war against terrorism it is a very serious problem that you cannot come up with evidence against the terror suspects because most of the evidence is circumstantial and hard to prove in a court,” Askari said. Any perceived propaganda value of “high-profile” arrests such as Khan’s was also evaporating as the courts pressured authorities to build better cases and produce solid evidence, he added.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda

#1  Khan’s case is among several where people arrested on suspicion of plotting attacks on Western targets and helping Al Qaeda have later been released by courts.

Anyone sensing a pattern here?

It shows that the real culprits are free to do whatever they want and the authorities are catching innocent people to prove their efficiency

The above pertains to Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Jordan, Iraq or Yemen? Choose from the following answers.

A.) None of the above.

B.) One of the above.

C.) Some of the above.

D.) All of the above.

E.) No shit, Sherlock.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 0:47 Comments || Top||

#2  be damn shame if his house (with him inside) got blow'd up
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 7:46 Comments || Top||


'US won't back another military govt in Pakistan'
Dennis Kux, author of two acclaimed books on US relations with Pakistan and India, said in a comment on the possibility of martial law in Pakistan that the US will not support a military government unless it quickly sets a date for new elections.

Kux said it is his feeling that “Musharraf’s compass has lost its bearing and is flying around in all directions.” Kux, a retired US ambassador who began his career with a posting in Pakistan, told Daily Times, “On Monday he [Musharraf] says X, Tuesday the opposite and Wednesday something else. Given the legal constraints on what Musharraf’s wants to do because of the Supreme Court fiasco and the shift in public attitudes, he has no good choices from his perspective.”
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  In light of the Palestinians' election of Hamas, I'd file this under:
"Be Very Careful About What You Ask For"
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 1:02 Comments || Top||

#2  Musharraf is fine albeit unpopular. It takes more than a popular candidate to make something that works. Democracy is possible if you have less than insane leaders in that part of the world.
Posted by: newc || 08/22/2007 1:04 Comments || Top||


Iraq
Democrats Refocus Message on Iraq After Military Gains
Democratic leaders in Congress had planned to use August recess to raise the heat on Republicans to break with President Bush on the Iraq war. Instead, Democrats have been forced to recalibrate their own message in the face of recent positive signs on the security front, increasingly focusing their criticisms on what those military gains have not achieved: reconciliation among Iraq's diverse political factions.

And now the Democrats, along with wavering Republicans, will face an advertising blitz from Bush supporters determined to remain on offense. A new pressure group, Freedom's Watch, will unveil a month-long, $15 million television, radio and grass-roots campaign today designed to shore up support for Bush's policies before the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, lays out a White House assessment of the war's progress. The first installment of Petraeus's testimony is scheduled to be delivered before the House Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees on the sixth anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, a fact both the administration and congressional Democrats say is simply a scheduling coincidence.

The leading Democratic candidates for the White House have fallen into line with the campaign to praise military progress while excoriating Iraqi leaders for their unwillingness to reach political accommodations that could end the sectarian warfare.

"We've begun to change tactics in Iraq, and in some areas, particularly in Anbar province, it's working," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) said in a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars on Monday.

"My assessment is that if we put an additional 30,000 of our troops into Baghdad, that's going to quell some of the violence in the short term," Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) echoed in a conference call with reporters Tuesday. "I don't think there's any doubt that as long as U.S. troops are present that they are going to be doing outstanding work."

Advisers to both said theirs were political as well as substantive statements, part of a broader Democratic effort to frame Petraeus's report before it is released next month by preemptively acknowledging some military success in the region. Aides to several Senate Democrats said they expect that to be a recurring theme in the coming weeks, as lawmakers return to hear Petraeus's testimony and to possibly take up a defense authorization bill and related amendments on the war.

For Democratic congressional leaders, the dog days of August are looking anything but quiet. Having failed twice to crack GOP opposition and force a major change in war policy, Democrats risk further alienating their restive supporters if the September showdown again ends in stalemate. House Democratic leaders held an early morning conference call yesterday with House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-Mo.), honing a new message: Of course an influx of U.S. troops has improved security in Iraq, but without any progress on political reconciliation, the sweat and blood of American forces has been for naught.

House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) made a round of calls yesterday to freshman Democrats, some of whom recently returned from trips to Iraq and made news with their positive comments on military progress. "I'm not finding any wobbliness on the war -- at all," Emanuel said.

The burst of effort has been striking, if only because Democrats left for their August recess confident that Republicans would be on the defensive by now. Instead, the GOP has gone on the attack. The new privately funded ad campaign, to run in 20 states, features a gut-level appeal from Iraq war veterans and the families of fallen soldiers, pleading: "It's no time to quit. It's no time for politics."

"For people who believe in peace through strength, the cavalry is coming," said Ari Fleischer, a former Bush White House press secretary who is helping to head Freedom's Watch.

GOP leaders have latched on to positive comments from Democrats -- often out of context -- to portray the congressional majority as splintering. Rep. Ellen O. Tauscher (D-Calif.), an Armed Services Committee member who is close to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), said many of her colleagues learned a hard lesson from the Republican campaign.

"I don't know of anybody who isn't desperately supportive of the military," she said. "People want to say positive things. But it's difficult to say positive things in this environment and not have some snarky apologist for the White House turn it into some clipped phraseology that looks like support for the president's policies."

Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-Calif.), who made waves when he returned from Iraq by saying he was willing to be more flexible on troop withdrawal timelines, issued a statement to constituents "setting the record straight."

"I am firmly in favor of withdrawing troops on a timeline that includes both a definite start date and a definite end date," he wrote on his Web site.

But in an interview yesterday, McNerney made clear his views have shifted since returning from Iraq. He said Democrats should be willing to negotiate with the generals in Iraq over just how much more time they might need. And, he said, Democrats should move beyond their confrontational approach, away from tough-minded, partisan withdrawal resolutions, to be more conciliatory with Republicans who might also be looking for a way out of the war.

"We should sit down with Republicans, see what would be acceptable to them to end the war and present it to the president, start negotiating from the beginning," he said, adding, "I don't know what the [Democratic] leadership is thinking. Sometimes they've done things that are beyond me."

In the fight for the Democratic presidential nomination, former senator John Edwards issued a scathing attack on Clinton's remark. But he said there has been "progress in Al-Anbar province."

"Senator Clinton's view that the President's Iraq policy is 'working' is another instance of a Washington politician trying to have it both ways," Edwards campaign manager David Bonior said in a statement. "You cannot be for the President's strategy in Iraq but against the war. The American people deserve straight talk and real answers on Iraq, not double-speak, triangulation, or political positioning."

Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 08/22/2007 11:52 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Any decision to for the USA to truly leave will be left to Dubya's post-Jan 2009 successor as POTUS. Short of new 9-11's or WMD-Nuke Terror Amer Hiroshima(s) inside Amer proper, ALL THE US DEMOLEFTIES = ANTi-GOP'ers ARE DOING IS POSTURING/PC-ing FOR 2008 WID NO SERIOUS INTENT TO PULL-OUT. FROM IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, ANDOR THE ME-MUSLIM REGIONS. Dubya is entrenching = emplacing, NOT retreating. Radical islam is down, not out yet, but Amer's position in the ME is solidifying and has NOT yet been seriously damaged [despite US casualties] by the Terrorists, and Osama Bin Laden [iff alive?]as MAHDI-HIDDEN IMAM-SALADIN, etc INCARNATE IS NOT AROUND TO DE FACTO PHYSICALLY LEAD THE ARMIES OF ISLAM AGZ THE USA-WEST. AND, Waffle/PC-happy US Pols gener do NOT wish to be linked wid any defeat or failure, Amer or Allied or Muslim or even PCorrect Radical islamist, Amer Allied or Enemy, etc.!
Colectively, MilPol and Economically, there's little to no reason for anti-Bush-GOP Pols, Dems, and MSM to continue promo = defend anti-US Radical Islamists-Terrorists, not even on a "neutralist/moderate/centrist" basis. THE RADICAL MULLAHS KNOW THIS, ala their PRO-ISLAMIST, ANTI-US/WESTERN, ANTI-DEMOCRATIC/MATERIALIST, "GLOBAL OIL/RESOURCE CATACLYSM", "Asses-and-Camels Forever" RANTS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 08/22/2007 20:25 Comments || Top||

#2  A heartening artile. Thanks for posting it, GolfBravoUSMC. And my thanks for reading the Washington Post, so that I don't have to. ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 20:56 Comments || Top||

#3  Cowardice and opportunism exposed - disgusting people. They deserve the flaying by their nutroots ex-supporters
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 21:03 Comments || Top||

#4  article. PIMF!!!

A useful analysis, JosephM. You've been saying so for some time, and it appears even a great many in the Democratic Party have finally realized it.
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 21:04 Comments || Top||


CNN vid : Masked men set Iraqi 5-years old child on fire
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 11:55 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  heartbreaking......I'd imagine the evil *ssholes that did this were sending a message to the dad who works as a security guard. That culture needs to disapear post haste.
Posted by: Broadhead6 || 08/22/2007 12:37 Comments || Top||

#2  That culture feral species needs to disapear post haste.
Posted by: Besoeker || 08/22/2007 12:41 Comments || Top||

#3  When the time comes for Western leadership to consider first strikes against the MME (Muslim Middle East), it is these sorts of incidents that will linger in their memories as the codes get sent out.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 12:42 Comments || Top||

#4  Some people are so evil that they have to be killed to protect society from them.
Posted by: JohnQC || 08/22/2007 13:12 Comments || Top||

#5  This death cult needs to be dead.
Posted by: DarthVader || 08/22/2007 14:34 Comments || Top||

#6  These poor jihadis so traumatized by the Bush Oil War that they could so lose their humanity, etc. etc.

/the "left"
Posted by: Excalibur || 08/22/2007 15:17 Comments || Top||

#7  Maybe there are mitigating circumstances---maybe they thought he's a Jew, or something?
Posted by: gromgoru || 08/22/2007 16:55 Comments || Top||

#8  Maybe there are mitigating circumstances---maybe they thought he's a Jew, or something?

Ima stealin that g*rom!

>:)
Posted by: Red Dawg || 08/22/2007 22:14 Comments || Top||


Iraq: Baathists 'disown al-Qaeda'
Baghdad (AKI) - The leader of Iraq's banned Baath party, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, has decided to join efforts by the Iraqi authorities to fight al-Qaeda, one of the party's former top officials, Abu Wisam al-Jashaami, told pan-Arab daily Al Hayat.

"AlDouri has decided to sever ties with al-Qaeda and sign up to the programme of the national resistance, which includes routing Islamist terrorists and opening up dialogue with the Baghdad government and foreign forces," al-Jashaami said.

Al-Douri has decided to deal directly with US forces in Iraq, according to al-Jashaami. He figures in the 55-card deck of "most wanted" officials from the former Iraqi regime issued by the US government. In return, for cooperating in the fight against al-Qaeda, al-Douri has asked for guarantees over his men's safety and for an end to Iraqi army attacks on his militias.
For the low-level 'insurgents', maybe, but for him, no.
Recent weeks have seen a first step in this direction, when Baathist fighters cooperated with Iraqi government forces in hunting down al-Qaeda operatives in the volatile Diyala province and in several districts of the capital, Baghadad.
This article starring:
Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:36 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency

#1  They don't like having competition.
Posted by: gromky || 08/22/2007 9:41 Comments || Top||

#2  48 hour rule. But, if Al Douri is still alive and in charge of anything, this could be significant.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al || 08/22/2007 10:00 Comments || Top||

#3  IMHO - it is significant. I agree Al-Dhouri needs killing, but if the movement can be stripped of supporting AQI, it's a big move, and a success for al-Maliki, along with the accords with SIIC and the Kurds - see Captain Ed's take
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 21:07 Comments || Top||

#4  Boy, talk about the rats leaving the ship. Getting a little warm for you, al Douri?
Posted by: SteveS || 08/22/2007 21:44 Comments || Top||


Saddam commanders on trial for 91 revolt
Former commanders of Saddam Hussein’s military went on trial in Baghdad on Tuesday for their role in crushing a Shi’ite rebellion in southern Iraq at the end of the 1991 Gulf War in which tens of thousands were killed. Standing alongside the military officers were Saddam’s former defence minister at the time and his personal secretary. The most high profile of the 15 defendants is Saddam’s feared cousin, Ali Hassan al-Majeed, known as “Chemical Ali”.

The rebellion, and a simultaneous one in Kurdish areas in northern Iraq, erupted spontaneously in early March 1991 after a US-led coalition routed Saddam’s army in Kuwait. Rebels seized control of many towns in the south. The rebels expected US forces to come to their aid, especially since then US President George Bush senior had called on the Iraqi people and the military to oust Saddam. But, in a decision that has since been much debated, Bush and his coalition partners held their troops in check and Saddam was given a free hand to launch a swift counterattack with tanks and helicopters.

Tens of thousands are estimated to have been killed in the crackdown, either by the pursuing security forces or in prison. Prosecutors in the case have put the death toll at 100,000. Bush has since argued that, while he hoped a popular revolt would topple Saddam, he did not want to see the break-up of the Iraqi state and feared the collapse of the multinational coalition, including Arab states, that he had assembled.

The 15 accused face charges of crimes against humanity “for engaging in widespread or systematic attacks against a civilian population”. Three of the accused, including Majeed, were sentenced to death in the earlier Anfal trial, which dealt with a military campaign against Kurds in northern Iraq in 1988 in which tens of thousands of people were also killed. The five convicted in the Anfal case are appealing their sentences. If Majeed and the two others sentenced to death lose their appeal they could be executed before the latest trial is completed.

The court will hear about 90 witnesses and hear audio tapes and after-action reports. US officials involved in the court said there was little remaining evidence of the orders given because Saddam had ordered the destruction of records.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Baath Party

#1  He's not smiling anymore.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 08/22/2007 15:44 Comments || Top||

#2  his skull is...
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 21:10 Comments || Top||


Bush Says Iraqis Will Decide Their Own Future
U.S. President George Bush says, despite Washington's frustration with the slow pace of political progress in Iraq, it is up to Iraqis to decide the future of their government. VOA White House Correspondent Scott Stearns reports, the president is responding to an influential U.S. Senator who says Iraq's parliament should dismiss Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

The chairman of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee says Mr. Maliki's government cannot achieve a political settlement, because it is too bound by its own sectarian prejudices. Michigan Senator Carl Levin wants Iraq's parliament to remove Mr. Maliki's government, because he says it has "totally and utterly failed."

Speaking at a news conference, President Bush replied that it is up to the Iraqi people to determine the future of their government, not American politicians.
And that's the rub, isn't it? It's their country, and within certain limits they're free to screw it up the way they please. We don't live there, and our politicians aren't in charge there.

The great hope we had for the Muddle East was that we would be able to nudge them into "democracy." The fundamental problem we had with that was one of definition: to us it's been a mostly mutually understood shorthand for "individual liberty." Democracy by that definition is a symptom, not a cause. It's a way for free men to govern themselves. In the horrible caricatures of democracy that have been grown in the mutant garden of post-colonialism, we've seen things purporting to be democracy that feature things like
  • Bangladesh, where parties notable mostly for their corruption take turns despoiling the nation;
  • Pakistan, where the military decides who's going to rule - not govern - and then sets up the alliances to make it happen, making sure to take care of their own first;
  • Zim-bob-we, where the "parliament" is controlled by crooks spouting pseudo-Marxist gobbledygook whose primary intent is to despoil the country and provide for themselves, to the extent the former Breadbasket of Africa now has 80 percent unemployment, the world's highest rate of inflation, and actual starvation;
  • Iran, where a presidential system exists and is controlled by million- and even billionaire theocrats who decide who's going to run, then decide who's going to win;
  • Egypt, Yemen, Azerbaijan, and all the places where the "people's will" is expressed by hereditary presidents-for-life.
Each of these, and all the others who're pretty much like them in spirit if not in mechanics, uses the form of democracy to continue functioning at the same old stand of despotism. "The people's will" always needs, for one reason or another, to be controlled, throttled, directed, whether to keep them from repudiating the Vanguard of the Proletariat, the One True Religion, or The Greatest Mind of His Age. "Democracy" is always desirable in such places within limits, the limits being the validation of the rulers.

It would be to the advantage of the oppressed common folk to throw off these systems, but we forget that it's a frightening thing for them, too, even the ones who're capable of formulating the idea. In Iraq there is a tradition that literally dates to the dawn of civilization of The Masses™ being at the service of the rulers. That was the mechanism by which we came to have civilization in the first place. Iraqis after 5500 to 6000 years of this are by now conditioned to being ruled, not governed. In their own minds they need to be told what to do, whether it be by the tribal sheikh, by a clan elder, by Sargon II, or by Moqtada al-Sadr. Islam flourishes in countries like that, because it has rules for everything, to include peeing, pooping, and other activities that we in the West didn't used to discuss in mixed company. You never have to worry about what to do next because somebody's already told you, or is willing to tell you.

Is there a possibility of individual liberty in that kind of society? Not while they're living in thrall to Islam. The Islamic Masses™ are denied the fundamental right to change religion, which means they don't have any true freedom of thought. From freedom of thought flows all other freedoms. Probably the best we can hope for is fair-minded and benevolent rulers, not expressing the People's Will, but doing what's best for them. As a matter of our own state policy we should probably be looking for them right now and providing them with the means to impose their will.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency

#1  U.S. President George Bush says, despite Washington's frustration with the slow pace of political progress in Iraq, it is up to Iraqis to decide the future of their government.

They have, it's shari'a and that means we, or someone else, will be coming back to upset the applecart sometime in the near future.

Islam flourishes in countries like that, because it has rules for everything, to include peeing, pooping, and other activities that we in the West didn't used to discuss in mixed company. You never have to worry about what to do next because somebody's already told you, or is willing to tell you.

Great commentary, Fred.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 1:11 Comments || Top||

#2  REALITY > Dubya isn't leaving the ME, and not even the Dems vv 2008 are gonna leave, Wafflecrats included. Radical Islam is gonna need more pressuurrre to make 2008-minded US Pols notice.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 08/22/2007 5:32 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Olmert worried about possible Fatah-Hamas reunification
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:01 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Palestinian Authority


Haniyeh: 'Refugee solutions are a political fraud'
Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh on Tuesday strongly condemned the meetings and negotiations held between Israel and Fatah, "no one is qualified to give up Jerusalem. We will not give up any part of Palestine and won't accept any plan derived from secret negotiations," said Haniyeh. "Solutions for the refugees are a political fraud and we will not accept them under any circumstances." Israel Radio quoted Haniyeh as saying.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Haniyeh: 'Refugee solutions are a political fraud'

Finally noticed that, did he? I sure hope Israel catches on sometime soon.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 1:00 Comments || Top||


IDF to transmit radio propaganda to Gaza Strip
The IDF is planning to set up a radio station which will broadcast to Gazans propaganda against terrorism, Channel 10 reported on Tuesday. The station will also transmit warnings prior to IDF attacks. It is expected to cost NIS 10 million.
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Try music and a call-in gardening show. I'd say Car Talk, but you can just imagine the calls whining about the failure of their car to explode.
Posted by: Perfesser || 08/22/2007 10:40 Comments || Top||

#2  Recipes. 24 hours of cooking recipes.
Posted by: gromgoru || 08/22/2007 17:19 Comments || Top||

#3  Suha Arafat got paid last week. Did you?
Posted by: tu3031 || 08/22/2007 17:32 Comments || Top||

#4  tough crowd here :-)
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 21:10 Comments || Top||

#5  Snark-O-Rama!™
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 22:07 Comments || Top||


Aksa Martyrs Brigades: We'll no longer honor agreements with Israel
Fatah's armed wing, the Aksa Martyrs Brigades, announced Tuesday it would no longer honor understandings reached with Israel, and called on its members to carry weapons to defend themselves against the IDF. "We call on all our members who handed over their weapons to the Palestinian security forces to report to their commanders so that they can be issued new weapons," said a leaflet distributed in Ramallah.

The group said the decision was made after the IDF arrested two Fatah gunmen who had been given amnesty by Israel in line with understandings reached between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel agreed last month to stop pursuing some 270 Fatah fugitives on condition that they surrender their weapons and sign a pledge to refrain from terrorist activities. Earlier this week, the PA said Israel had "pardoned" another 110 Fatah fugitives in the West Bank - a claim that Israel denied.

The latest leaflet is seen as a challenge to PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's efforts to dismantle the Aksa Martyrs Brigades and other Fatah-linked armed groups in the West Bank. According to the group, Israel on Monday night arrested Iyad Bisharat and Ahmed Abu Jalboush, two Fatah gunmen whose names had appeared on the first list of pardoned fugitives. "We call on all our members to display caution and not to be deceived by the so-called amnesty from Israel," the leaflet read. "We will no longer honor the agreements that were reached with Israel over the issue of the wanted men. We won't hand over our guns. This is a lie designed to split the Palestinian resistance."

The group said it had previously warned against the "plot" aimed at confiscating the weapons of Aksa Martyrs Brigades members in the West Bank. "The Israeli enemy does not respect any commitments or agreements," it said.

The Fatah group also criticized PA Prime Minister Salaam Fayad's government, holding it responsible for the arrest of its two men. "Fayad must clarify his position vis-á-vis the arrest of our men, whose names had appeared on the list of wanted men who received amnesty," it said.

An Israeli official said in response that such a move by Fatah's military wing would only escalate violence. "Israel expects the Palestinian Authority to take proper steps to root out terrorism against Israel, and to work with Israel to chart a more promising future for both sides," an official in the Prime Minister's Office said. "Incitement such as this only serves to ratchet up the situation, and would only harm the chances for progress between both peoples."
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: al-Aqsa Martyrs

#1  Boy howdy, that whole amnesty thingy worked out ever so peachy keen, dinnit? Ain't it about time for Israel to burn the Roadmap for the kindling it is and get on with expelling every last Palestinian from within its borders? By this time, nobody should be fooled about any prospects for peace so long as a single Palestinian continues to draw breath.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 0:39 Comments || Top||

#2  You have no honor or code anyways. Since when did you "honor" anything?
Posted by: newc || 08/22/2007 0:52 Comments || Top||

#3  Deuteronomy 7:1-4
Posted by: Excalibur || 08/22/2007 9:34 Comments || Top||

#4  I doubt that even Condoleezza is surprised.
Posted by: gromgoru || 08/22/2007 12:26 Comments || Top||

#5  That was very unexpected, wasn't it?
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 12:33 Comments || Top||


Money for nothing (and checks for free)
Gaza's public employees are getting paid on one condition: Stay home.

Such is the irony of life in the Gaza Strip now that Hamas militants are firmly in charge. A rival pro-Western government in the West Bank is delivering salaries to most of Gaza's civil servants as long as they don't work.

The moderate Fatah movement of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas doesn't want its money propping up Hamas, which violently seized control of Gaza in June. But neither does it want to punish Gaza's mostly pro-Fatah 90,000 civil servants whose salaries form the backbone of the already badly bruised economy. The result is a lot of inactivity. And many — fearful for their safety in a Hamas-dominated land — aren't pleased about their holiday from work.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Seafarious || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Hey, whadda they care? Like it's their money?
Posted by: tu3031 || 08/22/2007 2:13 Comments || Top||

#2  As luck would have it, I had the String Quartet in C-Sharp Minor Opus 131 by Beethoven playing, from the soundtrack Band of Brothers, whilst reading this.

Really sad violins....
Posted by: Bobby || 08/22/2007 6:56 Comments || Top||

#3  I love your headline, Sea.
Posted by: Glenmore || 08/22/2007 7:31 Comments || Top||

#4  moderate Fatah movement my ass. Only the MSM could write something like that with a straight face.
Posted by: Spot || 08/22/2007 8:22 Comments || Top||

#5  or call them, " A rival pro-Western government in the West Bank".

government? heh. And I guess it is "pro-western" because the Europeans are sending the money for the checks.
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861 || 08/22/2007 11:59 Comments || Top||

#6  "We are living in terror and fear," he said in an interview.

Whoa, Nelly! That almost elicited a note or two from my nanoviolin.

It sounds like these guys took a page from America's farm subsidy playbook.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 22:04 Comments || Top||


Olde Tyme Religion
Arabs surf Israeli pr0n sites
Owners of Israeli s*ex sites report high percentage of entries from Jordan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia. The hit: Clips starring female soldiers and Mossad women.

Adar Shalev
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict apparently does not disturb and even encourages Arab internet users from consuming kosher Hebrew pr0n. Operators of a number of pr0n sites report that between two and 10% of their users arrive from Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Jordan, Egypt, and the Palestinian Authority. Some websites even go as far as offering services in Arabic.

Nir Shahar, who manages the Israeli pr0n website, 'Ratuv' (wet), said that his company produced pr0n movies that have typical Israeli themes featuring female soldiers, female Mossad agents and policewomen.

It turns out there is a high demand for such content even in countries that are defined as "enemy sates." The most popular video clip among Arabs, "Code name: Deep investigation," is described as "a parody dealing with the Vanunu affair with agents investigating the affair using e*rotic means."

In the past several months we see an increase in traffic from countries that have no diplomatic ties with Israel including Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Egypt," Shahar said.

Due to the demand, Shahar added an Arabic version of the site. "We received many thank you messages from Arab surfers. Many of whom asked if the female soldiers really serve in the IDF," he said.

Looking at photos

"We get hundreds of hits from surfers that live in countries where pr0n is prohibited," said Gil Naftali owner and operator of another Hebrew sex site, S*exV. "We don't have an Arabic version because users log in to watch photos and video clips that require no explanations."
I'll say!

According to site statistics, last month there were over 2,000 hits from Riad, the capital of Saudi Arabia. The average time a Saudi surfer spends on S*exV is 17:23 minutes.
Just enough time, no more, no less.

Data also shows that 10 percent of the visitors to the most popular s*ex site in Israel, Domina, are Arabic speakers. "That is because we offer content in their language," said Tzahi who operates the site.

Nothing seems to stop the pr0n-consuming Saudi, not even technical difficulties: "In many places Israel is blocked, at times the entire suffix ".co.il" is blocked. Users connect through proxy servers and reach us that way," he said.

The motive behind these initiatives is purely economical, and by means the desire to connect people through the international language of pr0n.
That's how I learned english, you know!
"Israeli and Arab surfers do not communicate on the website. Ideology? No, it's purely business," Tzahi laughed. "Pr0n will not bring about peace but at least we get some money out of our enemies' pockets."
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:27 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  2-10%? hell, "Goat Week" on Animal Planet gets more Arab hits
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 7:55 Comments || Top||

#2  Goat Week? How do I get to that?
Posted by: Achmed Mohammad Ali-Babba al-Zarqawi || 08/22/2007 8:12 Comments || Top||

#3  You know, I think the the appropriate organizations would call those sites treyfe.
Posted by: Eric Jablow || 08/22/2007 8:29 Comments || Top||

#4  http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={319B3C86-9E7C-4429-8615-5222CF42F68D}

Good article on our arab friends!!!
Posted by: Paul || 08/22/2007 10:25 Comments || Top||

#5  Here are a couple of Israeli soldiers.
camoflage
Posted by: Deacon Blues || 08/22/2007 15:34 Comments || Top||

#6  Links?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble || 08/22/2007 16:11 Comments || Top||

#7  Found on Flickr, Nimble.
Posted by: Deacon Blues || 08/22/2007 16:31 Comments || Top||


Science & Technology
Slow Burn Lasers Roam the Skies
The U.S. Army and Air Force have discovered that low power lasers can be pretty lethal battlefield weapons. For decades, the conventional wisdom was that you needed a high powered laser (as in instantly burning through the metal skin of a missile). But over the last few years, it's become obvious that slow burn (lower powered) lasers will do useful stuff like cause the explosives in shells, missiles and roadside bombs to go off. That's very useful, and the U.S. Department of Defense has been conducting lots of tests of late to find out exactly how useful these cheaper, easier to use (because of the lower power requirements) lasers would be.

More work is also being done on lasers that can blind enemy sensors. This sort of thing has been around for years, but new, cheaper and more sensitive sensors are also more vulnerable to lasers. With progress, you often get new perils as well.

The army is mounting slow burn lasers on hummers, and plans to use them for detonating roadside bombs. The air force is mounting similar lasers on C-130s, so that death from above will have a new meaning. In development are lower power lasers for blowing up rockets, missiles and shells in flight. Microwave and laser powered weapons are soon to be in use on a wide scale. It shouldn't be a surprise, given the great deal of development work under way.

Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC || 08/22/2007 12:58 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  RIAN > Second TOPOL-M[Bulava] MISSLE BATTALION to be deployed. Russia to conduct over 100 LR Missle exercises THIS FALL [Fall 2007]. Relate to RIAN > FORMER US CIA OFFICIAL SAYS USA READY TO ATTACK IRAN IN SIX MONTHS.

* GULFNEWS/MENEWS > US designation of Iranian IRGC as "Terrorists" meant as act of provocation agz Iran. US War agz Iran looms ever closer.

Meanwhile, back in WESTPAC, MVARIETY > ANDERSEN AFB USED FOR SIMULATED ATTACK MISSIONS/BOMBING RUNS. * PAC STARS-N-STRIPES > First F-22's deploy to Japan. Planes may possess anti-Missle/SATWAR capability.'Round batch of circa 40 F-22's to event deploy to Alaska.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 08/22/2007 19:59 Comments || Top||

#2  RIAN = IRAN, right? Or do I have to go thru wierd googles again to make sure.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike || 08/22/2007 20:31 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
Indonesia district drops school virginity test plan
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:14 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  For the time being.
Posted by: Seafarious || 08/22/2007 10:49 Comments || Top||

#2  Hmmm... Pretty soon, teachers' unions here will militate for compulsory gayness as a requirement to attend school...
Posted by: M. Murcek || 08/22/2007 11:40 Comments || Top||

#3  In other news, Imams across Indonesia were heard wailing in their beards.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 12:43 Comments || Top||


Court rejects Bashir's case against police
An Indonesian court has rejected a class action lawsuit filed by hardline cleric Abu Bakar Bashir, who had sought the disbanding of the police's anti-terrorism unit. Bashir, who has been accused by foreign governments of being the spiritual head of regional Islamic extremist network Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), had alleged the unit violated human rights.

The 68-year-old served more than two years in jail for his role in the Bali bombings in October 2002, which left 202 people dead and were blamed on JI. Among the dead were 88 Australians, for whom the anti-terrorism unit was named. Bashir's lawyers had demanded the court declare the actions of the US and Australian-funded unit in violation of the law for making arbitrary arrests.

The unit, known as Detachment 88, has made a string of militant arrests in recent years, including several high-profile catches this year. Judge Wachyono told a hearing at the South Jakarta District Court the class action suit filed by Bashir's lawyers in June did not meet legal requirements. "The panel of judges is of the opinion that the defendant did not provide details on which groups he represents and therefore the suit is unclear and vague," he said.

The suit alleged officers from the unit had used torture to obtain confessions and that their work discriminated against Muslims as they were the unit's sole targets. About 70 supporters of Bashir protested the verdict by banging on tables and shouting, "Disband Detachment 88!" and "Allahu Akbar!" (Holy Shit! God is greater).
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Jemaah Islamiyah

#1  Nudge, nudge. Wink, wink.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 1:03 Comments || Top||

#2  Another guy that needs to fall under a train.
Posted by: tu3031 || 08/22/2007 2:15 Comments || Top||

#3  Send 'em to Bangla for "special training" by the RAB...
Posted by: mojo || 08/22/2007 13:53 Comments || Top||


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Ahmadinutjob sez: Iran safest place for investment
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said the Islamic Republic is the most secure country in the world for making investments.

"Requests for making investments in Iran have had an upward trend. The volume of Iran's trade dealings with other countries has also been increasing," Ahmadinejad said at a meeting with Iranian nationals residing in Baku, Azerbaijan, on Tuesday.

The chief executive went on to say that entrepreneurs from many countries including Malaysia, China and Spain are willing to put substantial amounts of money into Iran projects and are confident about the security of their investment.

Elsewhere in his remarks, the president said, "Iran has managed to go through the arduous process of achieving industrial-scale nuclear fuel production thanks to the Resistance™ of the Iranian people and the consensus over the nuclear program. No one can stop this from moving ahead."

"All those initially against Iran accessing nuclear technology for peaceful aims acknowledge the Legitimate Right™ of the Iranian nation today. But it is difficult for them to admit their mistake due to their arrogance," he stated.

The President gave assurances that those with ill intentions can no longer cause troubles for Iran.

He added, "The ill-disposed were concerned about Iran reaching the zenith of knowledge and success in its nuclear fuel technology because they were well aware that such achievement would change the international equations in favor of the world's nations."

President Ahmadinejad arrived in Baku on Tuesday for a two-day working visit at the head of a political and economic delegation.
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:58 || Comments || Link || [10 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Iran

#1  I like the picture.If anyonec suffers from small man syndrome its him!!!!!
Posted by: Paul || 08/22/2007 9:28 Comments || Top||

#2  Ignore that man behind the curtain! The following is from 2005, imagine how much worse it has become in almost two years.
Capital flight in Iran over the past fortnight reached its highest recorded level since the 1979 Islamic revolution, prompting financial advisors to the hard-line government of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to call for a temporary suspension of the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE), according to market investors.

The market flight took a dramatic turn for the worse after Ahmadinejad made a speech in Tehran calling for the destruction of Israel and threatening Iran’s Muslim neighbours that developed ties with the Jewish state, an investor close to the government, who wished to remain anonymous, said.

The hard-line president’s remarks were condemned by the international community, and Tehran received a reprimand by the United Nations Security Council.

The capital flight began in earnest in June, after the election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as the new president. Ahmadinejad’s record as a radical Islamist and a former Revolutionary Guards commander, and his reputed remark that “stock exchange speculation is forbidden in Islam” sent jitters through the country’s markets. Nervous investors have been transferring their capital to safe havens such as Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. In the past four months, the Tehran Stock Exchange has lost more than 20 percent of its value.

The following article is a must read for anyone unfamiliar with how Ahmadinejad has crippled Iran's petroleum industry: From the Wall Street Journal
Because it controls the oil revenue, which comes in U.S. dollars, the Islamic state has a vested interest in a weak national currency. (It could get more rials for the same amount of dollars in the domestic market.) Mr. Ahmadinejad has tried to exploit that opportunity by printing an unprecedented quantity of rials. Economists in Tehran speak of "the torrent of worthless rials" that Mr. Ahmadinejad has used to finance his extravagant promises of poverty eradication. The result has been massive flights of capital, mostly into banks in Dubai, Malaysia and Austria. Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, the Islamic Chief Justice, claims that as much as $300 billion may have left the country since President Ahmadinejad was sworn in.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 12:37 Comments || Top||

#3  Interesting links, Zenster. Thanks! I can understand the Iranians sending their money to Dubai. I could even understand Switzerland or Liechtenstein, were they doing that. But why Austria?
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 13:55 Comments || Top||

#4  "We have many many subprime opportunities for you."... that translates correctly does it not?
Posted by: Aquavelvetmad || 08/22/2007 14:31 Comments || Top||

#5  Safest place for investment? In what? Construction futures after the place is bombed to the stone age?
Posted by: DarthVader || 08/22/2007 14:35 Comments || Top||

#6  But why Austria?

Nostalgia.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 19:21 Comments || Top||

#7  LOL, that one leaves a mark, Zen
Posted by: Frank G || 08/22/2007 21:15 Comments || Top||

#8  Back at'cha, Frank.
Posted by: Zenster || 08/22/2007 21:17 Comments || Top||


Generals can give orders, not rule! Tueni tells Suleiman
Ghassan Tueni, publisher of An Nahar ridiculed in his weekly column Lebanon's army chief Gen. Michel Suleiman for being dragged into politics and tempted to head what he termed "military government."

"We expect from the brave Lebanese army … to achieve victory in its war on terror at Nahr al-Bared instead of allowing those with suspicious intentions to tempt it to (lead) a military government," Tueni sarcastically exclaimed in An Nahar's a front-page editorial.

He expressed fear that such a government would turn Lebanon into "dictatorships" just like Hosni al-Zaim's coup that overthrew democracy in Syria and Saddam's takeover of Iraq. "Oh! Our courageous army, Our wise and patient (army) commander, beware of being misled," Tueni pleaded. "You can give orders in war, but orders are (restricted) to the constitution when it comes to ruling Lebanon and safeguarding its identity, historical message, human rights and freedoms."

Addressing Suleiman, Tueni said: "Devote yourself to bandaging the wounds of your soldiers … and worry about achieving civil rule. …Then there will be no room for criticism that the army is unable to protect its border and that the need to maintain 'civil' resistance will last forever with the help of divine power until Lebanon achieves independence and sovereignty," Tueni said in reference to Hezbollah. "Let the army be the only resistance. Only then that the army would be contributing to uniting the Lebanese, not by their military rule."
Posted by: Fred || 08/22/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  there is a fine line between bravery and stupidty. Am I the only one who thinks it's a bad idea for a publisher to publically challenge one who is "attempting to head a military government". It might have been a good time to be a bit more diplomatic.
Posted by: Unutle McGurque8861 || 08/22/2007 11:55 Comments || Top||


Terror Networks
Al-Qaeda in North Africa losing recruits - deserter
Posted by: anonymous5089 || 08/22/2007 07:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda in North Africa

#1  "ALGIERS: Dozens of foreigners who joined Al-Qaeda's Algeria-based North Africa wing have been leaving because they are dead disillusioned,
a recent deserter from the group said in remarks published on Wednesday."


I bet Al-Qaeda in Iraq is having similar problems.
Posted by: Glenmore || 08/22/2007 7:22 Comments || Top||

#2  "They are doing the opposite of what Islam advocates," he said, mentioning suicide bombings and racketeering. "Resorting to suicide attacks and explosives is the strategy of organizations at bay."

Interesting statement from a former AQ/Maghreb leader, even if he did qualify it by saying that the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan are different.
Posted by: trailing wife || 08/22/2007 20:10 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
44[untagged]
15Iraqi Insurgency
10Taliban
5Global Jihad
5Hamas
4al-Qaeda
3[untagged]
2Fatah al-Islam
1Govt of Sudan
1Iraqi Baath Party
1Chechen Republic of Ichkeria
1Islamic Courts
1Jemaah Islamiyah
1Mahdi Army
1Muslim Brotherhood
1Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal
1Palestinian Authority
1al-Qaeda in North Africa
1Thai Insurgency
1Govt of Iran
1al-Aqsa Martyrs

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Wed 2007-08-22
  Aksa Martyrs: We'll no longer honor agreements with Israel
Tue 2007-08-21
  'Saddam's daughter won't be deported'
Mon 2007-08-20
  Baitullah sez S. Wazoo deal is off, Gov't claims accord is intact
Sun 2007-08-19
  Taliban say hostage talks fail
Sat 2007-08-18
  "Take us to Tehran!" : Turkish passenger plane hijacked
Fri 2007-08-17
  Tora Bora assault: Allies press air, ground attacks
Thu 2007-08-16
  Jury finds Padilla, 2 co-defendents, guilty
Wed 2007-08-15
  At least 175 dead in Iraq bomb attack
Tue 2007-08-14
  Police arrests dormant cell of Fatah al-Islam in s. Lebanon
Mon 2007-08-13
  Lebanese army rejects siege surrender offer
Sun 2007-08-12
  Taliban: 2 sick S. Korean hostages to be freed
Sat 2007-08-11
  Philippines military kills 58 militants
Fri 2007-08-10
  Saudi police detain 135
Thu 2007-08-09
  2,760 non-Iraqi detainees in Iraqi jails, 800 Iranians
Wed 2007-08-08
  11 polio workers abducted in Khar, campaign halted


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
18.221.174.248
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (28)    Non-WoT (20)    Opinion (7)    Local News (12)    (0)