Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 03/22/2005 View Mon 03/21/2005 View Sun 03/20/2005 View Sat 03/19/2005 View Fri 03/18/2005 View Thu 03/17/2005 View Wed 03/16/2005
1
2005-03-22 Great White North
Ontario May Turn to Idled Reactors to Fill Power Gap
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2005-03-22 00:00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Come on, guys. Even France and Canada think nukes are safe enough. Can't we have some here? Please? Especially those of you who think our sole response to Islamofascism is to reduce our oil consumption (while simultaneously voting against ANWR).
Posted by jackal  2005-03-22 12:09:34 AM|| [http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2005-03-22 12:09:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Kyoto (closing coal fired plants) biting them in the rear?
Posted by ed 2005-03-22 12:27:30 AM||   2005-03-22 12:27:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 After many decades of whining and moaning about the cost of heating oil, you'd thought nice standardized medium size reactors like those in Sweden, Japan, etc. would populate the back country of New England. But, noooooooooooo..... Shheeehhhhhhh. More people have died in a vehicle driven by Sen. T.Kennedy (D-MA) than from anything from Three Mile Island.
Posted by Thans Anginetch3773 2005-03-22 8:37:14 AM||   2005-03-22 8:37:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 If they had built the Nuke plants they wanted to back in the 80s, we would not have power problems today. No pollution and we have enought juice to chrage those babe-magnet electric cars.
Posted by Cyber Sarge  2005-03-22 11:58:39 AM||   2005-03-22 11:58:39 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Bab's Boxer's solution is to "Close the SUV Loophole. We need to hold SUV's to the same mileage standards as other vehicles. We can have 16 ANWARs if we just do that."
My truck is classed as an SUV simply because it has 4-wheel drive. She doesn't have a clue about power-to-weight ratios or mileage-to-horsepower/gear ratios. To her it's very simple. Mandate that all SUV's get 30 mpg. When Detroit (or any other group) makes a truck that will haul 40 bails of hay or pull a trailer with 5 horses and still gets 30 mpg I'll be the first in line. Reducing our dependance on foreign oil is the only thing that will work, not some new mandate from congress.
Posted by Deacon Blues  2005-03-22 12:29:39 PM||   2005-03-22 12:29:39 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Deacon Blues, Babs doesn't have a clue about anything, really. And when you call her on it, she cries.
Chicks like that tork me off.
Posted by Desert Blondie 2005-03-22 1:00:36 PM|| [http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2005-03-22 1:00:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 I think all SUVs should be required to get 90 mpg (driveway) and we should raise the minimum wage to $25.00/hr to help pay for it. My plan also saves social security and will bring a sense of empowerment to bus riders.

Posted by Shipman 2005-03-22 2:37:15 PM||   2005-03-22 2:37:15 PM|| Front Page Top

23:46 Bobby
23:43 Glitle Craviter4997
23:40 Elmoting Granter5118
23:39 SteveS
23:36 Bobby
23:34 Bobby
23:29 mrp
23:18 Unugum Sneth6886
23:13 phil_b
23:10 AzCat
23:04 True German Ally
23:03 mom
23:00 badanov
22:59 True German Ally
22:54 Peppah
22:54 Desert Blondie
22:52 Frank G
22:52 True German Ally
22:51 Frank G
22:49 Aris Katsaris
22:47 True German Ally
22:45 jn1
22:45 Peppah
22:38 Barbara Skolaut









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com