Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 04/16/2006 View Sat 04/15/2006 View Fri 04/14/2006 View Thu 04/13/2006 View Wed 04/12/2006 View Tue 04/11/2006 View Mon 04/10/2006
1
2006-04-16 Home Front: Politix
Clarke opposes Iran invasion
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Flelet Spavinter3070 2006-04-16 01:09|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Who in the f&ck has been advocating an invasion? Headlines should read "Clarke and rest of world (including W and Rumsfeld) opposes Iran Invasion"


what a weak-ass piece of "journalism" agit-prop
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2006-04-16 01:32||   2006-04-16 01:32|| Front Page Top

#2 Who?

Iran's likely response, assuming it's done correctly, thoroughly, and mercilessly, will be to roll over into the dying dead cockroach position. And stay there as Iran disintegrates.

Who do these "experts" and "geniuses" think will be around to keep up the payments on the terror networks? Aren't they smart enough to realize that once the regime goes down, so do the networks they supported? No, I guess not.

More of the anti-weathervane at work here. Whatever these clowns are against doing, we should do forthwith.
Posted by Elmens Cheretle8179 2006-04-16 04:37||   2006-04-16 04:37|| Front Page Top

#3 You know it is a good idea when Clarke sez not to.
Posted by djohn66 2006-04-16 09:00||   2006-04-16 09:00|| Front Page Top

#4 You beat me to it, #3.
Posted by  Barbara Skolaut"> Barbara Skolaut  2006-04-16 09:05|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/page/15bk1/Home_Page.html]  2006-04-16 09:05|| Front Page Top

#5 "Iran has forces as its command far superior to anything Al Qaeda was ever able to field," they said, citing Iran's links with the militant group Hezbollah.

And that's supposed to be an argument for NOT crushing the Mad Mullahs????

Fucking idiots...

Posted by Dave D.">Dave D.  2006-04-16 09:34||   2006-04-16 09:34|| Front Page Top

#6 Here's a brief symposis: Clinton (including Clarke) chickened out in late-1990s, so it is a bad idea now.

Meantime, in the subsequent years, we have reaped the difficulties of a lame Clinton administration.
Posted by Captain America 2006-04-16 12:12||   2006-04-16 12:12|| Front Page Top

#7 This idiot would have advised Roosevelt to stay out of World War II. We'd all be either Nazis or dead.
Posted by Darrell 2006-04-16 12:50||   2006-04-16 12:50|| Front Page Top

#8 We'll subdue the mullahs with computer virii.
Posted by R. Clarke, Terrorism and Computer Crime Expert 2006-04-16 13:33||   2006-04-16 13:33|| Front Page Top

#9 Clarke opposed my potato salad, but it was irrelevant to my guests.
Posted by 6 2006-04-16 19:41||   2006-04-16 19:41|| Front Page Top

#10 I oppose Clarke's continued breathing my oxygen.
Posted by DarthVader 2006-04-16 21:27||   2006-04-16 21:27|| Front Page Top

23:49 CrazyFool
23:42 CrazyFool
23:27 zazz
23:26  Barbara Skolaut
23:22 twobyfour
23:17 john
23:17 RD
23:15 john
23:00 Lancasters Over Dresden
22:58 Lancasters Over Dresden
22:56 Lancasters Over Dresden
22:54 Lancasters Over Dresden
22:49 Dave D.
22:40 Bama Marine
22:40 borgboy
22:39 RWV
22:38 Mike Kozlowski
22:35 Redneck Jim
22:28 Bobby
22:26 Redneck Jim
22:26 Bobby
22:20 Redneck Jim
22:19 Alaska Paul
22:18 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com