Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 05/09/2005 View Sun 05/08/2005 View Sat 05/07/2005 View Fri 05/06/2005 View Thu 05/05/2005 View Wed 05/04/2005 View Tue 05/03/2005
1
2005-05-09 Britain
Major Nuclear Boo-Boo In Britain
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-05-09 15:19|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I bet the clean-up crew will be using a lot of Mop and Glo.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2005-05-09 15:46||   2005-05-09 15:46|| Front Page Top

#2 AC? 20 tons of fuel?
Posted by Shipman 2005-05-09 16:11||   2005-05-09 16:11|| Front Page Top

#3 Oh loward, now the "We're gonna glow green and DIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEE" loonies are getting the Moonbat call.
Posted by Laurence of the Rats  2005-05-09 4:17:16 PM|| [http://www.punictreachery.com/]  2005-05-09 4:17:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 I find it hard to believe there are 20 tonnes of fuel in half an Olympic size swimming pool. I don't remember just how much uranium is in a critical mass but it's a lot less than 20 tonnes. It doesn't take a lot of uranium to make up a tonne volume wise and it is dissolved in nitric acid, which is very nasty stuff itself, but that number still seems quite high. One can have a critical mass but not a nuclear explosion if the concentration and shape aren't right. A nuclear reactor has more than enough for a critical mass but there isn't a nuclear explosion because the fuel rods are long and not concentrated. You do get extremely high heat as seen in the Chernoybol and 3 Mile Island accidents. Hmmm, I'll have to do some cipherin' on that 20 tonnes.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2005-05-09 16:34||   2005-05-09 16:34|| Front Page Top

#5 At one time, fast breeder reactors running on plutonium seemed like good idea and reprocessing was needed to make it work. Since then reprocessing has provided way to much ammunition for the anti-nuclear ideologues. Let's accept reprocessing is a bad idea, shut it down, bury nuclear waste in disused coal mines and start building uranium fueled reactors.
Posted by phil_b 2005-05-09 16:42||   2005-05-09 16:42|| Front Page Top

#6 There's about 126 tonnes of water in an Olympic pool, if my google is correct, 63 tonnes in half a pool. I wonder about the 20 tonnes thingy, too.

FYI:
Plutonium is removed from spent fuel by chemical separation; no nuclear or physical separation (as for example in uranium enrichment) is needed. To be used in a nuclear weapon, plutonium must be separated from the much larger mass of non-fissile material in the irradiated fuel.

The jargon 'head end' is applied to those operations which must be carried out before the separation process itself begins. They include receipt of the fuel in the head end plant and mechanical operations to reduce the fuel elements to a more suitable form for the processes which follow.

Once free of the supporting structure, the elements are cut up, placed in a dissolver and dissolved in hot nitric acid. During this process, the 'dissolver off-gases' krypton, xenon, iodine and carbon dioxide, together with nitrogen oxides and steam (from the nitric acid) are released. All of these, except krypton and xenon which are chemically inert, but radioactive, gases, are typically trapped or recycled for re-use. Any particles of fuel cladding or fission products which have not dissolved are removed by filtering them out in a centrifuge.

After being separated chemically from the irradiated fuel and reduced to metal, the plutonium is immediately ready for use in a nuclear explosive device. If the reactor involved uses thorium fuel, 233 U, also a fissile isotope, is produced and can be recovered in a process similar to plutonium extraction.

Posted by Chuck Simmins">Chuck Simmins  2005-05-09 16:43|| http://blog.simmins.org]">[http://blog.simmins.org]  2005-05-09 16:43|| Front Page Top

23:48 Sherry
23:46 DMFD
23:25 Dar
23:07 3dc
23:04 CrazyFool
23:03 muck4doo
22:57 Angie Schultz
22:49 Glenmore
22:47 Frank G
22:36 3dc
22:32 mom
22:30 mom
22:29 SC88
22:18 crazyhorse
22:08 Pappy
22:01 mojo
21:55 Seafarious
21:45 Barbara Skolaut
21:17 trailing wife
21:16 Frank G
21:13 trailing wife
21:11 .com
21:11 Mike Kozlowski
21:09 Cyber Sarge









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com