Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 10/22/2008 View Tue 10/21/2008 View Mon 10/20/2008 View Sun 10/19/2008 View Sat 10/18/2008 View Fri 10/17/2008 View Thu 10/16/2008
1
2008-10-22 Science & Technology
BlackLight Power, Inc.
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by BrerRabbit 2008-10-22 05:20|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 how long before the gas companies buy this up and we never hear of it again?
Posted by chris 2008-10-22 12:42||   2008-10-22 12:42|| Front Page Top

#2 This is pretty interesting. It would be very easy to dismiss if they didn't have an impressive board and supposed results.

Posted by Penguin 2008-10-22 13:17||   2008-10-22 13:17|| Front Page Top

#3 Not only is blacklight wonderful for power but if you have a painting done on black velvet the blacklight makes it look so bitchin, duuuuuude.
Posted by Bill S. Preston Esq. 2008-10-22 16:16||   2008-10-22 16:16|| Front Page Top

#4 Impressive boards are there for impressing the rubes. It's bullshit, people. Haven't you ever seen a perpetual motion machine scam before?
Posted by Mitch H.">Mitch H.  2008-10-22 17:06|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]">[http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2008-10-22 17:06|| Front Page Top

#5 nah, but my wife seems to be in slow motion alot
Posted by chris 2008-10-22 17:49||   2008-10-22 17:49|| Front Page Top

#6 Ball bearings, people. Forget this BLP stuff. Everything is ball bearings these days.
Posted by Scott R 2008-10-22 18:40||   2008-10-22 18:40|| Front Page Top

#7 Mills explains that in this contraption, resembling a souped-up home furnace, water is electrically then catalytically broken down into atoms of oxygen and hydrogen. Potassium atoms are introduced as a gas into the very low-pressure hydrogen gas waiting inside the cell. Under specific conditions, the potassium acts as a catalyst to collapse hydrogen's electron orbit. The energy once used to maintain the higher orbit is released as ultra-violet light, Mills says.

Utter nonsense.
Posted by john frum 2008-10-22 19:48||   2008-10-22 19:48|| Front Page Top

#8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randell_Mills

Hydrino theory was developed by physician Randell L. Mills as a new model of the hydrogen atom that posits the existence of orbital states for the electron of a hydrogen atom with enhanced binding energy compared to the conventional ground state of hydrogen.[1] Mills proposed that the electron in a hydrogen atom can reach an orbital state below the ground state of conventional quantum theory via a non-radiative transfer of an integral number of Hartrees to a suitable catalyst, thus releasing large amounts of energy and converting the "ground-state" hydrogen into a lower-energy hydrogen atom called a hydrino.[1] Most[1] physicists agree that the existence of hydrino states with the properties Mills attributes to them is incompatible with quantum mechanics. Moreover, no hydrino states have ever been agreed by independent sources to have been observed to exist.[1]

Mills asserts that his theory, which he terms "Classical Quantum Mechanics" (CQM), unifies Maxwell's Equations, Newton's Laws, and Einstein's General and Special Relativity, and that it is founded on the principle that physical laws hold over all scales—from that of subatomic particles to that of the cosmos—thus overturning conventional quantum field theory.[2] Mills first put forth his proposition of the hydrino in 1991 to explain the disputed reports of cold fusion experimentalists of excess heat in certain electrolytic cells.[2]

Andreas Rathke of the European Space Agency has pointed out that the existence of a hydrino is unlikely in the environment proposed by Mills.[1] A 2005 evaluation by Rathke, found "severe inconsistencies" in Mills' theory, including a lack of "solutions that predict the existence of hydrinos". Rathke also stated that Mills' equations were not Lorentz invariant, a requirement of any theory that explains the behavior of particles moving close to the speed of light.[3]
Posted by john frum 2008-10-22 19:55||   2008-10-22 19:55|| Front Page Top

#9 1.88 gigawatts and a flux capacitor is all that is needed
Posted by Emmett Brown, Prof. Bttf 2008-10-22 23:06||   2008-10-22 23:06|| Front Page Top

23:58 3dc
23:57 Sherry
23:52 Don Vito Omeling5062
23:51 ex-lib
23:46 ex-lib
23:42 General_Comment
23:39 Betty
23:35 General_Comment
23:35 clipatuillath
23:34 JosephMendiola
23:31 USN, Ret.
23:24 Sherry
23:24 Betty
23:22 General_Comment
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:19 Betty
23:19 Steve White
23:17 General_Comment
23:17 Betty
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:14 USN, Ret.
23:13 CrazyFool
23:09 Betty
23:09 JosephMendiola









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com