Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 11/13/2007 View Mon 11/12/2007 View Sun 11/11/2007 View Sat 11/10/2007 View Fri 11/09/2007 View Thu 11/08/2007 View Wed 11/07/2007
1
2007-11-13 -Short Attention Span Theater-
What would the world look like if compressed to 100 people?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by gorb 2007-11-13 03:49|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 5 US Americans and Canadians

5 would control 32% of the entire world’s wealth, and all of them would be US citizens

Except the ones who are Canadians and not "US Americans".

It irritates me to no end India gets lumped in with Afghanistan and North Korea. "Asian", indeed. They must all be from Asialand.

This leftist garbage is always overtly racist. Not just masochistically anti-white but racist in the old fashioned sense.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-11-13 09:39||   2007-11-13 09:39|| Front Page Top

#2 80 would live in substandard housing

If 80 out of 100 live in it - whatever it is - then it is standard housing. Al Gore palaces would be above standard.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-11-13 09:41||   2007-11-13 09:41|| Front Page Top

#3 # 1 (only one) would have a college education.

And that one means the market is still so saturated with useless qualifications someone with a Master's degree is permanently underemployed in downtown Toronto.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-11-13 09:44||   2007-11-13 09:44|| Front Page Top

#4 7 people would have access to the Internet

Which, given the above, explains the comments to videos on YouTube.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-11-13 09:45||   2007-11-13 09:45|| Front Page Top

#5 50 would be malnourished and 1 dying of starvation

And her name is Kate Moss.
Posted by Excalibur 2007-11-13 09:47||   2007-11-13 09:47|| Front Page Top

#6 100% of the people reading that page will suffer an epilectic attack.

I gotta go lie down now.
Posted by Seafarious">Seafarious  2007-11-13 11:17||   2007-11-13 11:17|| Front Page Top

#7 95% would be batshit insane and do things daily that are against their own best interests, and those of their neighbors, because of (religion/clan/honor/tribe/laziness/pride).
Posted by rjschwarz 2007-11-13 12:01||   2007-11-13 12:01|| Front Page Top

#8 5 would control 32% of the entire world’s wealth, and all of them would be US citizens
Okay, apparantly the Queen of England, King of Saudi Arabia and the Catholic Church are all American citizens? Not buying it? Controlling wealth while excluding land is bogus twisting of numbers.
Posted by rjschwarz 2007-11-13 12:04||   2007-11-13 12:04|| Front Page Top

#9 Lets see the real benefit of a college education:

5 Americans (including Canada) control 32% of the world's wealth, yet there is only 1 person in the whole world with a college education and by odds is most likely to be a non-white, male, heterosexual Asian. So, you see, we don't need no freeking colleges. Save your money and teach your kids Golf.
Posted by Jack is Back!`">Jack is Back!`  2007-11-13 12:59||   2007-11-13 12:59|| Front Page Top

#10 100% of the people reading that page will suffer an epilectic attack.

Sea: Apparently you forgot to subtract the LLL crowd.
Posted by gorb 2007-11-13 14:48||   2007-11-13 14:48|| Front Page Top

#11 Hey, how come the gay guy's Greek?
Posted by tu3031 2007-11-13 14:51||   2007-11-13 14:51|| Front Page Top

#12 Noticed that too, eh
Posted by Chedderhead 2007-11-13 15:19||   2007-11-13 15:19|| Front Page Top

#13 Hey, how come the gay guy's Greek?

And Charlie Nanook don't surf ski, neither. What the hell's up with that?
Posted by Angie Schultz 2007-11-13 15:34||   2007-11-13 15:34|| Front Page Top

#14 "33 would be without access to a safe water supply"
That's 2 billion people without safe water, and yet they live long enough to reproduce. I think that's a bit like Excaliber's point in comment #2. How safe is "safe"?
Posted by Darrell 2007-11-13 15:45||   2007-11-13 15:45|| Front Page Top

#15 And 20 of you are plotting on how to convert, enslave, or kill the other 80.
Posted by Angu Dingle 2007-11-13 16:19||   2007-11-13 16:19|| Front Page Top

#16 Leftist carp about wealth and scheme to come to power and redistribute wealth without realizing it must be created. This particual bunch of loonies act like the US took wealth from others. Bull. Its not a zero sum game.

Hey leftists:

We control much of the world's wealth because WE CREATED IT!

Biotech, transistors, cell phones, the PC, the internet, etc - they did not exist wordl-wide and now they do thanks to the US. Our brains, our work, our inventiveness and adaptability created wealth where there was none.

Go piss up a rope with your socialist collectivist BS.
Posted by OldSpook 2007-11-13 16:29||   2007-11-13 16:29|| Front Page Top

#17 5 Americans control 32% of the wealth? Sweet! Now go wash my car.
Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader  2007-11-13 16:35||   2007-11-13 16:35|| Front Page Top

#18 "What would the world look like if compressed to 100 people?"
And Rosie O'Porko would still be one fat ass biotch.....
Posted by USN,Ret. 2007-11-13 16:36||   2007-11-13 16:36|| Front Page Top

#19 Since when did Yosemite Sam move to Latin America?
Posted by Ulaising Jones3412 2007-11-13 18:42||   2007-11-13 18:42|| Front Page Top

23:20 JosephMendiola
23:19 CrazyFool
23:17 Don Vito Shens6025
23:13 JosephMendiola
22:57 JosephMendiola
22:51 JosephMendiola
22:49 Zhang Fei
22:49 Eric Jablow
22:39 JosephMendiola
22:24 JosephMendiola
22:24 Redneck Jim
22:17 JosephMendiola
22:12 JosephMendiola
22:04 Redneck Jim
22:01 Rob Crawford
21:56 JosephMendiola
21:55 trailing wife
21:54 Redneck Jim
21:52 JosephMendiola
21:51 Phaigum Untervehr4039
21:47 JosephMendiola
21:47 Redneck Jim
21:43 Wholuque Gonque5344
21:42 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com