Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/18/2007 View Sat 11/17/2007 View Fri 11/16/2007 View Thu 11/15/2007 View Wed 11/14/2007 View Tue 11/13/2007 View Mon 11/12/2007
1
2007-11-18 Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Debka so Salt to taste: Putin decides to fuel Bushehr
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2007-11-18 00:26|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top
 File under: Govt of Iran 

#1 However, if the Pahlavi Monarchy still held sway in Iran, then we wouldn't care if they operated a reactor. I wonder if defense planners have found a way to topple the Ayatollahs, without destroying much of the country. Iran still has a professional military that might want to see Qom replaced by a lake. A coup would be very bloody, but who cares? I don't.
Posted by McZoid 2007-11-18 02:34||   2007-11-18 02:34|| Front Page Top

#2 A coup would be very bloody, but who cares?

The Muslim ass-kissing Mainstream Media?
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-11-18 02:59||   2007-11-18 02:59|| Front Page Top

#3 a reactor unconnected with Iran’s suspect military program

Ha! Just more raw material if nothing else.

Moscow's decision to let Iran have the uranium to fuel its Bushehr reactor six months before its scheduled start-up

Just more muddied water to hide behind - and another nail in Iran's coffin. I figure Russia will be happy as long as they get paid. And when Iran gets whacked it raises the price of oil (which more than offsets the economic impact of Iran's disappearance to their economy) and gets rid of Iran as a competitor for influence in the region - a win|win situation for the Russians.

The step was gladly welcomed in Tehran

By who? Are they in such desperate need of energy for their blossoming economy?
Posted by gorb 2007-11-18 03:21||   2007-11-18 03:21|| Front Page Top

#4 Are they in such desperate need of energy for their blossoming economy?

Peaceful "nuclear" energy? Yes.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-11-18 03:33||   2007-11-18 03:33|| Front Page Top

23:16 Mike
23:14 Barbara Skolaut
22:58 Mike
22:06 Procopius2k
21:48 Injun Flavise8457
21:38 Injun Flavise8457
21:36 GK
21:23 Zhang Fei
21:00 Frank G
20:56 Slappy
20:37 Frank G
20:32 trailing wife
20:32 Injun Flavise8457
20:29 Injun Flavise8457
20:19 Mike N.
20:19 Pappy
20:17 Anonymoose
20:11 Dave D.
19:59 Phinater Thraviger
19:59 eLarson
19:58 Nimble Spemble
19:52 Frank G
19:40 Slappy
19:40 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com