Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/18/2007 View Sat 11/17/2007 View Fri 11/16/2007 View Thu 11/15/2007 View Wed 11/14/2007 View Tue 11/13/2007 View Mon 11/12/2007
1
2007-11-18 Home Front: Culture Wars
Burglary in Progress
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by anonymous5089 2007-11-18 11:14|| || Front Page|| [8 views ]  Top

#1 Dr. Szasz is an atheist, and being 87 years old, will also be testing that theory shortly. Meanwhile, Great Britain puts homeowners in jail and anger management classes for defending their property against the misunderstood yobs who are just as sane as they are, and maybe moreso.
Posted by Phinater Thraviger 2007-11-18 12:44||   2007-11-18 12:44|| Front Page Top

#2 The reason the pols really don't care directly about crime is because it is not a direct threat to their power. It only becomes a threat when enough voters get pissed off and start backing someone promoting 'law and order'. To paraphrase Governor William J. Le Petomane, "We've gotta protect our phoney baloney jobs, gentlemen!" That's why they went after Benny Goetz. He was treated as a direct threat to the legitimacy of the state which had/has treated its citizens as expendable to the sociopathic elements of the society. That's why governments around the world will spend an inordinate amount of time and effort going after those who defend themselves, their families, and their property because it shows the rest of the citizenry that the state is unable or unwilling to perform one of the fundamental rationales for the existence of the government.
Posted by Procopius2k 2007-11-18 14:13||   2007-11-18 14:13|| Front Page Top

#3 Szasz is being unfairly pilloried as relativizing deviancy, though it is fair to say that he helped empty the institutions, but not as much as Jack Nicholson. Szasz also said that society could pass laws to punish behaviour and that people were responsible for their behaviour, i. e. no insanity defence as there is no such thing as insanity but there is such a thing as anti-social behaviour. You do the crime, you do the time.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2007-11-18 15:39||   2007-11-18 15:39|| Front Page Top

#4 If they are in your house they are fair game to shoot.
Posted by 3dc 2007-11-18 16:33||   2007-11-18 16:33|| Front Page Top

#5 Texan.
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2007-11-18 16:35||   2007-11-18 16:35|| Front Page Top

#6 To admit that the terrorist is deviant, or that something is awry in his culture, would violate one of the central tenets of progress: all cultures are equal—on the condition that they be oppressed. Western culture, like the homeowner, deserves no protection.

Good article. This is precisely why I have ZERO faith in the democrats ever managing to adequately deal with terrorism. They simply will not accept responsibility for the logical outcome of their multiculturalist agenda.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-11-18 16:57||   2007-11-18 16:57|| Front Page Top

#7  The reason the pols really don't care directly about crime is because it is not a direct threat to their power.
P2K gets the Qupie Doll.
Posted by Deacon Blues">Deacon Blues  2007-11-18 18:58||   2007-11-18 18:58|| Front Page Top

23:16 Mike
23:14 Barbara Skolaut
22:58 Mike
22:06 Procopius2k
21:48 Injun Flavise8457
21:38 Injun Flavise8457
21:36 GK
21:23 Zhang Fei
21:00 Frank G
20:56 Slappy
20:37 Frank G
20:32 trailing wife
20:32 Injun Flavise8457
20:29 Injun Flavise8457
20:19 Mike N.
20:19 Pappy
20:17 Anonymoose
20:11 Dave D.
19:59 Phinater Thraviger
19:59 eLarson
19:58 Nimble Spemble
19:52 Frank G
19:40 Slappy
19:40 Pappy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com