Article

2003-04-21 Iraq

Galloway was in Saddamâs pay, say secret Iraqi documents

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Phil B 2003-04-21 11:15 pm|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Well, thanks for screwing up the page width...

Posted by mojo 2003-04-21 23:18:15|| 2003-04-21 23:18:15|| Front Page Top

#2 Man, this is a massive story. Given the UK's libel laws you gotta know that the Telegraph has something real or they're finished as a publication.

Posted by R. McLeod 2003-04-21 23:39:39|| 2003-04-21 23:39:39|| Front Page Top

#3 Hint: should a similar situation ever pop up where the link is really LONG, go to http://tinyurl.com to get a reduced length link that points to the original.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2003-04-21 23:56:09|| 2003-04-21 23:56:09|| Front Page Top

#4 Anonymous: that is a dead-set, ball-busting BRILLIANT STORY what a piece of investigative journalism.

This will crack the left in britain wiiiide open.

Just follow the money a wise man said to me once: we should ask these penetrating questions of many leftie organisations and individuals.

Posted by anon1 2003-04-22 00:15:08|| 2003-04-22 00:15:08|| Front Page Top

#5 Holy hell, someone fix the article before the page width makes my monitor explode...

Posted by someone 2003-04-22 00:45:25|| 2003-04-22 00:45:25|| Front Page Top

#6 This is a fantastic story, but I'm not sure if it has legs. The establishment media are curiously reluctant to cover the exposure of "agents of influence" for some reason. The open, undisputed financial connection between ANSWER and the Saddam regime is a case in point. This came in the form of "legal fees" paid to ANSWER's top shill and point man, former Attorney-General Ramsey Clark, who also happens to have been Saddam's official legal representative in the United States. This has received little attention from the media, though, again, the facts are not in dispute. ANSWER simply dismisses the idea that they could be so low as to be influenced by mere money, while hypocritically suggesting that the Bush Administration would commit practically any crime to sharpen the profit margin of any company with whom it has the slightest association.

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2003-04-22 00:52:25|| [www.nuclearspace.com] 2003-04-22 00:52:25|| Front Page Top

11:32 Anonymous
11:27 Anonymous
11:20 Anonymous
11:07 Anonymous
09:42 raptor
09:30 raptor
08:57 raptor
08:18 raptor
08:06 raptor
21:00 Ed Becerra
20:58 anon1
20:46 Bomb-a-rama
19:56 KP
19:45 Bomb-a-rama
19:41 Lu Baihu
19:35 KP
19:24 Anonymous
19:15 Ed
19:14 Sassafrass
19:06 KP
19:05 11A5S
19:04 KP
18:59 Better safe than sorry
18:48 john