Article

2003-05-30 Home Front

Burqa Girl Update: Judge holds fate of veil

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tu3031 2003-05-30 11:36 am|| || Front Page|| [8 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I'm sorry, but I really have to laugh. Guess who came up with the mendaciously named "Religious Freedom Restoration Act", and why. Now it occurs to them that other religous zealots can ALSO use the Act to cause problems.

Whadda ya say we put FIVE bullets in the revolver this time, huh?

Posted by mojo 2003-05-30 12:43:11|| 2003-05-30 12:43:11|| Front Page Top

#2 She didn't seem to mind showing her face for the mugshot when she was convicted of assault.... for beating up a foster child. She seems the perfect candidate for the Religion of Peaceâ¢. BTW, Zufari is right....that kind of face covering is cultural so she should STFD and STFU.

Posted by Rex Mundi 2003-05-30 14:23:41|| 2003-05-30 14:23:41|| Front Page Top

#3 "If certain Christians are allowed not to have their faces photographed on drivers licenses, then the Muslims should have the right to wear the veil," he said.

Excuse me? I've never heard of such a thing. Is this CAIR guy talking out his ass even more than the usual CAIR spokesliar?

Posted by growler 2003-05-30 14:28:47|| 2003-05-30 14:28:47|| Front Page Top

#4 growler See here for a fairly spirited analysis of the issue. You will have to page down for several entries over a few days.

http://volokh.com/

Posted by DORF 2003-05-30 16:57:27|| 2003-05-30 16:57:27|| Front Page Top

said the Winter Park woman, whose soft voice could barely be heard

Yeah, she only raises her voice when screaming at the children she's beating...
Skank hag...

Posted by Celissa 2003-05-30 18:42:49|| [www.celissasblog.com/weblog.php] 2003-05-30 18:42:49|| Front Page Top

#6 "Dajani said, adding that even in the most conservative of Muslim countries, women are required to show their faces for photo identifications"

That's not true.

As reported on Rantburg, Soddie women do not have any ID card of their own. They are put on the bottom of their husbands (or nearest male relative's) ID card.

They are not real human beings, after all, are they?

I mean they are only of slave-status in Soddie.

All those people who cried out at the injustice of Apartheid between blacks and whites in South Africa couldn't give two f*ing hoots about the actual physical and social enslavement of an entire gender.

At least under apartheid, south african blacks were allowed to drive and have their very own identity. So they were actually better off than Saudi women.

Posted by Anon1 2003-05-31 06:58:30|| 2003-05-31 06:58:30|| Front Page Top

09:28 Raptor
09:16 Raptor
08:22 Aris Katsaris
08:08 Raptor
08:03 Aris Katsaris
07:59 Aris Katsaris
07:31 Raptor
07:25 Raptor
07:17 Raptor
06:58 Anon1
06:48 Raptor
06:39 Raptor
06:03 Raptor
00:33 mojo
00:32 Tremor
23:54 Celissa
23:46 True German Ally
22:32 Barbara Skolaut
22:16 Anonymous Troll
22:14 Anonymous Troll
22:10 Anonymous Troll
22:07 Bomb-a-rama
22:04 Bomb-a-rama
21:50 Bomb-a-rama