Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 07/24/2003 View Wed 07/23/2003 View Tue 07/22/2003 View Mon 07/21/2003 View Sun 07/20/2003 View Sat 07/19/2003 View Fri 07/18/2003
1
2003-07-24 Afghanistan
B-52 bombs attackers of US base in Afghanistan
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2003-07-24 10:22:10 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 ...nice comment....

coffee on the keyboard again.
Posted by Anonymous 2003-7-24 10:35:20 AM||   2003-7-24 10:35:20 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 B-52? Sounds like a message to future mortar/rocket attackers.
Posted by Frank G  2003-7-24 10:51:59 AM||   2003-7-24 10:51:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 > B-52? Sounds like a message to future mortar/rocket attackers.

No, I think it is the new paradigm. I just talked to my niece’s husband (just back with a broken foot) and he said they are flying the B-52 in cold-war era mode loaded with JDAMs. The “boots” on the ground can call for support with a GPS number and these old birds (sitting high and safe) can respond. If you look at any photo footage coming out of there you can see big circular “con trails” in the sky.

An old bird with dumb bombs (but smart tail fins) giving the boots on the ground precision air support ….now that is a Tax dollar that was well spent!
Posted by Red 2003-7-24 12:25:19 PM||   2003-7-24 12:25:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 I was suprised by the rapid response of the B-52 myself, but your comment makes sense, Red. I recall a paper a looooong while ago (+15 years), called "An embarassment of riches", which advocated re-arming B-52s with Tomahawks or flechette dispersing bombs. Old idea, old tactics, updated with new technology for a new mission. *thumbs up* Good job, and good comment!
Posted by Ptah  2003-7-24 3:43:37 PM|| [http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]  2003-7-24 3:43:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 It seems that Gulf II did not fully incorporate afghan lessons, but then those high-speed drive-by probes set their own new standard.

I know an old SAC pilot whose has a son that now flies a BUFF (b52) that is older than he is. He says that it is not the best place to spend a workday.

There seems to be a (post afghan) report circulating that states that a properly armed BUFF wing with minimal Fighter support could have done a better job in the IRAQ “No Fly Zones” at a fraction of the cost.

B52 and close air support should be some sort of oxymoron but I guess it is not!
Posted by Red 2003-7-24 5:49:46 PM||   2003-7-24 5:49:46 PM|| Front Page Top

00:37 Anonymous Troll
08:13 Ptah
02:00 mojo
23:32 tu3031
22:53 Tokyo Taro
22:27 mojo
22:24 mojo
22:21 mojo
22:18 mojo
22:12 Beau - CA Escapee
21:55 john
21:53 Zhang Fei
21:24 mer
20:45 parallaxview
20:25 Zhang Fei
20:21 Ptah
20:19 flash91
19:50 Anon1
19:29 Captain Kirk
19:28 Scottie
19:27 Matt
19:27 Mr. Spock
19:24 Aris Katsaris
19:18 Korora









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com