Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 08/05/2003 View Mon 08/04/2003 View Sun 08/03/2003 View Sat 08/02/2003 View Fri 08/01/2003 View Thu 07/31/2003 View Wed 07/30/2003
1
2003-08-05 India-Pakistan
India has to sacrifice on Kashmir, says Jamali
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 11A5S 2003-08-05 12:40:45 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 After India's recent efforts to open doors, this is rather a slap in the face, it seems. Mebbe RamaLamaDinDong Jamali should avoid live interviews in the future. I can only imagine the steam this generated in the Indian Govt. I think they're both half-assed moronic asshat stuck-in-amber and/or crazed-loonie Govt's, but still...
Posted by Â·com 2003-8-5 2:30:39 AM||   2003-8-5 2:30:39 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 11 - i dont think hes actually asking for money, just using money to quantify how little he thinks Pak should concede on Kashmir. The big question is whether to keep Kashmir as one or divide it. If you keep it as one it seems clear that the majority would votefor independence or Pakistan - if you divide it a big chunk would vote to stay Indian.
Posted by liberalhawk 2003-8-5 9:24:52 AM||   2003-8-5 9:24:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 LH - Methinks you're spot-on. If they divide Kashmir, the Paki's "win", however, in that tiny speck of grey matter shared amongst the Indians. The Izzoids use the pop count when it suits them, other measures when it doesn't. In any case, it appears to be IsmoCreep to me - and somewhere around 800 million Indians will see it that way, too. Should be interesting to see what sort of response India decides upon.
Posted by Â·com 2003-8-5 10:30:36 AM||   2003-8-5 10:30:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Agreed LH. He's saying that India is a big, wealthy (by Pak standards anyway) country and should make all of the concessions. The irony as I see it is that India and the rest of the NAM used to use the same exact negotiating ploy with the US. (Forgive our debts! After all we are poor and you are so rich. It's exploitation, I tell ya!) I think that this is a purposeful insult to India.
Posted by 11A5S 2003-8-5 10:34:10 AM||   2003-8-5 10:34:10 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Liberalhawk is right, they should accept the status quo in kashmir and build a fence (along the lines of the one the Israeli's are building). Problem is, every Indian I've every talked too about the situation is not really flexible on the issue and status quo is not good enough.
Posted by Yank 2003-8-5 10:43:04 AM||   2003-8-5 10:43:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 given topography a fence is probably out of the question. Look how many infiltrators cross the misleadingly named "Line of Control"
Posted by Frank G  2003-8-5 11:22:03 AM||   2003-8-5 11:22:03 AM|| Front Page Top

05:45 LXD
02:23 R. McLeod
00:43 mojo
00:33 Anonymous
00:32 mojo
23:29 BJD (The Dignified Rant)
23:19 Anonymous
23:09 11A5S
23:03 Igs
22:03 Anonymous
21:52 tu3031
21:46 tu3031
21:46 Anonymous
21:39 Frank G
21:39 tu3031
21:32 tu3031
21:31 Raphael
21:19 Ptah
21:14 tu3031
21:03 Â·com
21:00 tu3031
20:52 tu3031
20:44 tu3031
20:32 tu3031









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com