Article

2003-12-03 Home Front

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2003-12-03 12:26:50 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 HILLARY, in a new gray green pants suit from De Spiel, said I'm very concerned! She was also quoted as saying "whats the problem?"

Posted by Lucky 2003-12-3 1:33:35 AM|| 2003-12-3 1:33:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Over the Clinton years, 8 regular Army divisions, 2 reserve divisions, 20 Air Force and Navy air wings (about 2,000 planes), 13 SSBN, 4 aircraft carriers, and 121 other ships and submarines were cut. Now complains we don't have enough troops and tools to do the job.

Which is why her reception in Iraq and Afghanistan was "polite". Our troops are pretty smart.

Posted by Ben 2003-12-3 4:17:56 AM|| 2003-12-3 4:17:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Good point Ben, but remember back in May that pig in a pantsuit was bellowing that our quick victory in Iraq was made possible by the "Clinton" military. Its a testament to our guys that their able to do more with less.

Posted by Mike 2003-12-3 7:44:47 AM|| 2003-12-3 7:44:47 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 "We need the legitimacy of the United Nations...

That's pretty funny Hillary. Changing your plans from president to standup comic?

saying he had dispatched the wrong "mix of troops" to secure the country and that victory "is not certain."

Well put, Hillary, except you are your hubby did everything they could to punish the military for being the military. The resulting 'force mix', for all of your efforts to deprecate our defense capability was way more than needed.

As for the 'victory is not certain' remark: You are a defeatist socialist traitor. You can start removing this tag by:

1) Apologizing to the troops in Iraq, beginning with the commander in chief for your defeatist comments.

2) State without equivocation that you and your husband will stand by Bush as he prosecutes the war as silent and willing participants.

3) You renounce your socialist tendencies and admit to the world your goal has been destruction of the United States.

Signal your willingness to comply by writing an $8 million check to military.com... Maybe shoot some money over to my website too.

Posted by badanov 2003-12-3 8:19:50 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org] 2003-12-3 8:19:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Usually a fact finding mission entails keeping one's mouth shut and one's ears open. It figures Billary couldn't even accomplish that simple task right.

Posted by Jarhead 2003-12-3 8:25:49 AM|| 2003-12-3 8:25:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Can anyone visualize that ass-wipe HELL-ary as POTUS? I honestly cannot.

Posted by alaskasoldier 2003-12-3 9:53:12 AM|| 2003-12-3 9:53:12 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 I'm suprised she took so long to bash Bush. I thought she would have started as soon as she left Iraqi air space.

Posted by Charles 2003-12-3 10:36:29 AM|| 2003-12-3 10:36:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Has anyone noticed how many times Hillary's name appears on an equivalent level w. that of the President in that article? We all know her motives, and it seems that the media is being utterly complicit (Ethel, Get My Pills!=EGMP) in her desire to present HERSELF as an equal but alternative choice to Bush...I'm not entirely convinced she won't run in '04...

Posted by mjh 2003-12-3 10:59:15 AM|| 2003-12-3 10:59:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, fresh from her own trip to Iraq, accused President Bush yesterday of conducting the war by a "political calendar," saying he had dispatched the wrong "mix of troops" to secure the country and that victory "is not certain."

The operative words here are "fresh from her own trip to Iraq", meaning, this criticism came after she left there. Way to go, Senator! No use peddling a worthless little "message" to an unreceptive and possibly hostile crowd. :)

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2003-12-3 12:41:06 PM|| 2003-12-3 12:41:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 I am just saddened that the Jr. Shrew from NY doesn't jump into the Presidential race. How great would it be for Bush to beat the chief poster gal for the Demoncrats? The day after the election, the DNC Chairman would say something like: "Apparently there has been wide-spread voter fraud because we cannot understand why Senator Clinton failed to secure a single delegate." Yup 2004 is going to be a bumpy ride folks, strap in and get ready.

Posted by Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter) 2003-12-3 1:13:41 PM|| 2003-12-3 1:13:41 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 I wonder who Hillary hired as her military "expert". She should immediately fire him/her - she learned NOTHING from her experience, and still knows squat about the US military and the people that fill it. To have someone who is a Senator on the Armed Services Committee who is so lacking in knowledge is a grave concern for this nation. The people of New York, who elected this walking ego, should be ashamed of themselves.

Posted by Old Patriot 2003-12-3 3:12:23 PM|| [http://users.codenet.net/mweather/default.htm] 2003-12-3 3:12:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Good news:Hillary will NOT run in 2004 because she did learn one thing from Bill,"its the economy stupid!".With evidence the economy is improving no way Bush can be defeated.
Really,really bad news:Hillary will run in 2008,so we are going to be constantly hearing from her for next 5 years.Especially since liberal-left holdouts in the press will be looking at Hillary as their saviour.

Posted by Stephen 2003-12-3 3:44:41 PM|| 2003-12-3 3:44:41 PM|| Front Page Top

19:31 Pastor Lee Wasson
04:11 SK
00:37 CrazyFool
23:43 possecommietaters
23:19 whatmoderatemuslim
23:14 Robert Crawford
22:38 whydoessuhaliveinparis?
22:35 Hyper
22:29 Catfish N. Cod
22:28 Catfish N. Cod
22:08 Catfish N. Cod
22:01 Old Patriot
21:58 Catfish N. Cod
21:57 Super Hose
21:46 Catfish N. Cod
21:43 Super Hose
21:42 tu3031
21:41 Super Hose
21:25 Dan Darling
21:25 babsthelimousineliberal
21:24 Super Hose
21:22 john
21:21 Rawsnacks
21:21 Super Hose