Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 12/12/2003 View Thu 12/11/2003 View Wed 12/10/2003 View Tue 12/09/2003 View Mon 12/08/2003 View Sun 12/07/2003 View Sat 12/06/2003
1
2003-12-12 Iraq
New Iraq army hit by resignations
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Paul Moloney 2003-12-12 12:00:56 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Yup--ya gotta pay us more if we're gonna get blown up by the Fedayeen remnants
Posted by NotMikeMoore 2003-12-12 12:52:34 AM||   2003-12-12 12:52:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 So they figured out that life in the private sector might be more profitable. Good for them. This says that the economy in Iraq is expected to pick up in the near future, if it's not already doing better. Secondly, the ones that stay are the ones that we want. The only bad thing about this that I can think of is if they left to join the other side.
Posted by Rafael 2003-12-12 2:42:20 AM||   2003-12-12 2:42:20 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 mmm the republican mind ahaha...everything that happens in IRAQ IS PROGRESS..if terrorist blow up cops it is a good thing and a sign of desparation..now desertion is a good thing...werent they(new Iraqi Army) supposed to be free and proud of their country and ready to die for it ..is this the future of the IRAQI aRMY...40% desertion within a fortnight. So If perennially under-paid American soldiers go Awol it will be sign thAT Bush's tax cuts are working ahaah
Posted by stevestradamus 2003-12-12 3:10:49 AM||   2003-12-12 3:10:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Desertions? Oh geez, I'm sorry. I thought the story was about resignations. I stand corrected.
Posted by Rafael 2003-12-12 3:27:56 AM||   2003-12-12 3:27:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 If you want to argue Rafael's point, it would do well to actually argue the point he made. Which is a good one, that this resignation is basically of people who are not committed to the defense of their own country. The ones that stayed, are the ones we want and the Iraqi people need.

Instead of creating straw men, and simply laughing at the point, you might want to engage your brain. Amazing how well it will improve your percieved credibility.
Posted by Ben  2003-12-12 3:28:28 AM||   2003-12-12 3:28:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Things are improving in Iraq. A year ago these recruits would have lost an ear or worse.
Posted by Gasse Katze 2003-12-12 3:36:17 AM||   2003-12-12 3:36:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Stevestrdamus, your an idiot. Thank you for letting me share.
Posted by Anonymous 2003-12-12 5:14:48 AM||   2003-12-12 5:14:48 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Finding the right level of pay for a volunteer army isn't always easy, especially when an economy is immature and hasn't stabilized around price levels for other goods and services yet.

Saddam's economy was extremely distorted; for the last decade+ it really was barely an economy at all and certainly not a market economy where prices reflect value. The trick to paying volunteer soldiers is to ensure a sufficiently decent lifestyle so that you attract good people, without feathering the nest so much that you attract those who aren't dedicated to serving.

Yup, when my husband was a junior officer we did need dedication, because nobody gets rich as a 1LT or a Captain.

I don't know what the right salary is for enlistees in Iraq, but I'm pretty sure this is the line of thinking behind the pay rate we've established.

Of course, one could build the kind of unionized army that several European countries have, but we probably want an effective fighting force in Iraq ...
Posted by rkb  2003-12-12 6:28:52 AM||   2003-12-12 6:28:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 The prime issue was that they were being paid as much as the cops and the civil defense folks, and, of course, the army has more prestige!

I'm afraid the secondary issue was that they wanted the training and insight into operations. That's a bad thing and I hope we have good info on the home addresses of these guys.
Posted by Chuck Simmins  2003-12-12 8:38:50 AM|| [http://blog.simmins.org]  2003-12-12 8:38:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 There's also the possibility that veterans of Saddam's "army" expected the new army to be another cushy job, but found that Western training methods require brains and hard work.

We are talking about a part of the world known for being piss-poor with maintenance, training, etc.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2003-12-12 9:16:11 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2003-12-12 9:16:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 400 is 1% of the standing 40,000 desired, and Chicken Stevey sez the sky is falling. Please, stevey, find a paper bag and take some deep breaths. Better yet, stick your head in a plastic bag and seal it.

This isn't great news, but it's not the end of the world either. Even if 100% stayed in, 700 soldiers is but a drop in the bucket. At least with the 400 remaining we know who is serious and willing to commit, and they will be invaluable in using their training to instruct still more troops.

Note, too, that these are paid volunteers, not conscripts. At least now they have the freedom to resign without being tortured and shot--immediately after their families have been tortured and shot.
Posted by Dar  2003-12-12 9:24:07 AM||   2003-12-12 9:24:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 When I went through OCS in Quantico, after week 7 of the 10 week program, Officer candidates had fulfilled their legal obligation of officer training and could DOR (drop on request) if desired. There are always some that do that. Good I say. Leaves the ones who want to still play. Resignation is much different then desertion - just ask the Russians.
Posted by Jarhead 2003-12-12 10:18:28 AM||   2003-12-12 10:18:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 "...now the recruits are being paid $60 a month..." Not enough, maybe? What's /capita income in Iraq? The Marines paid me about $106 a month to start.
Posted by Glenn (not Reynolds) 2003-12-12 2:26:21 PM||   2003-12-12 2:26:21 PM|| Front Page Top

15:54 Doc H
09:47 raptor
05:36 The Dodo
01:47 ,comma
01:05 Tresho
01:01 Aris Katsaris
23:27 Anonymous
23:24 Steve White
23:13 4thInfVet
23:09 Anonymous
22:57 4thInfVet
22:50 4thInfVet
22:22 Fred
22:13 Fred
22:05 Denny
22:02 ruprecht
21:54 Fred
21:29 Kentar
21:25 NotMikeMoore
21:23 Glenn (not Reynolds)
21:21 Jarhead
21:17 4thInfVet
21:16 Jarhead
21:06 Jarhead









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com