Article

2004-01-06 East Asia

Japan mulls 30% cut in number of tanks, artillery

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by phil_b 2004-01-06 5:35:06 AM|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Yep, guess they accepted the fact that tanks and artillery are not much good against incoming missiles. Practical lot, those Japanese...

Posted by Carl in NH 2004-1-6 5:43:00 AM|| 2004-1-6 5:43:00 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Sorry Fred, I seem to have mixed up Source with Posted By. My apologies!

Posted by phil_b 2004-1-6 6:02:56 AM|| 2004-1-6 6:02:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Yep, guess they accepted the fact that tanks and artillery are not much good against incoming missiles. Practical lot, those Japanese...

Additional infantry aren't much good against missiles either. This is a really bad move. It sounds like the defense budget is running short of cash, and officials had to choose between men and equipment. The problem with this approach is that infantry don't have much killing power - they serve mainly to direct artillery fire, less of which will be available because of this downsizing.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2004-1-6 11:19:47 AM|| 2004-1-6 11:19:47 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Zhang, are you sure that this is not a transition to create more heads for overseas deployment?

Posted by Super Hose 2004-1-6 11:49:01 AM|| 2004-1-6 11:49:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 If I ran a govt. in Asia I would get a little nervous if the Japanese started to deploy peacekeepers in the South East Asian Coprosperity Sphere.Backed up by aircraft carriers-er,"really large destroyers".

Posted by Stephen 2004-1-6 2:19:18 PM|| 2004-1-6 2:19:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Those would be "through-deck frigates", I believe.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2004-1-6 2:42:16 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com] 2004-1-6 2:42:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 But they still have Godzilla in storage somewhere, right?

Posted by Phil Fraering 2004-1-6 4:11:44 PM|| [http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com] 2004-1-6 4:11:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 They may have Godzilla in storage but we've triple cloned Raymond Burr.

Posted by Shipman 2004-1-6 4:44:23 PM|| 2004-1-6 4:44:23 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Yes, I see.

Posted by Phil Fraering 2004-1-6 9:43:51 PM|| [http://newsfromthefridge.typepad.com] 2004-1-6 9:43:51 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 If I ran a govt. in Asia I would get a little nervous if the Japanese started to deploy peacekeepers in the South East Asian Coprosperity Sphere.Backed up by aircraft carriers-er,"really large destroyers".

These aircraft carriers have displacements of 20,000 tons and can carry a few helicopters at most. WWII Japanese carriers displaced 70,000 tons and carried 100 warplanes. Worry isn't the first thought that comes to mind when one thinks of these upsized destroyers. More like a belly-laugh. It would be nice if Japan started putting together British-sized carriers, though - they could help in any scrap over Taiwan. (For some perspective, modern-era Nimitz-class carriers have displacements of 100,000 tons and carry 90 planes).

Posted by Zhang Fei 2004-1-6 11:11:29 PM|| 2004-1-6 11:11:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 Zhang Fei,the Japaneses designed and ordered these ships a few years ago when there was supposed to be a true VTOL version of the F-35.I remember reading a couple of years ago that Britain,Spain and Japan were interested in buying the VTOL version,and wondering why the Japanese were interested.Now that the F-35 has become an over-priced runway hog,the Japaneses are stuck w/helos.But you have to start somewhere,and I fearlessly predict the Japanese will have 1-2 full-fledged aircraft carriers by the end of the decade.Won't faze China,but,Thailand,Malaysia,et al might get nervous.

Posted by Stephen 2004-1-7 12:02:56 AM|| 2004-1-7 12:02:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 You'd think those Super-Saiyens and Gundams would be sufficient defense. :-) Seriously, sounds like they're starting to switch over from a 'cold war' military, to one that can deploy rapidly. Could be handy if Kim Sung Il has a particularly bad hair day.

Posted by A Jackson 2004-1-7 12:07:43 AM|| 2004-1-7 12:07:43 AM|| Front Page Top

06:49 Anonymous
07:33 raptor
03:18 Scott
01:21 Old Patriot
01:11 triticale
01:10 Old Patriot
00:55 Lucky
00:55 Old Patriot
00:41 Lucky
00:29 Lucky
00:07 A Jackson
00:05 CujoQuarrel
00:02 Stephen
00:00 tu3031
23:46 Old Patriot
23:46 A Jackson
23:44 Ed Becerra
23:41 4thInfVet
23:35 Stephen
23:35 A Jackson
23:27 S
23:23 Frank G
23:13 Raj
23:11 Zhang Fei