Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/01/2004 View Wed 03/31/2004 View Tue 03/30/2004 View Mon 03/29/2004 View Sun 03/28/2004 View Sat 03/27/2004 View Fri 03/26/2004
1
2004-04-01 Afghanistan/South Asia
Afghanistan: Return of the jihadis
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Paul Moloney 2004-04-01 1:45:13 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Yep, Bring your your bad asses. Your not going against soviets anymore and you RPGs are crap. Your funding is going away and your cadres are led by morons with a koranic education. So fuck@@f and die. Like cord wood.
Posted by Lucky 2004-04-01 1:56:15 AM||   2004-04-01 1:56:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 [Troll droppings deleted]
Posted by Murray TROLL 2004-04-01 8:01:19 AM||   2004-04-01 8:01:19 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 1. Eurasianet says the Uzbek troubles are the result of local tensions, not international at all
2. Atimes say attackers are a Sufi org - yet cooperating with Osame, Hekmatyar, ISI and other pro-Wahabi elements - seems unlikely to me - any other evidence for this?

3. Article mentions 43 dead, as if this were a danger sign - IIUC most of these dead were terrorists (I assume Jihadis)

4. No real evidence that this is connected to an attack in Afghan, other than the old (and unproven) connection to Hekmatyar.


So what the basis for the headline? :

Assertion - there will be a new wave of attacks in afghanistan. Why? there has been a wave of bloody attacks in Uzbek, these were done by the Sufis, and the Sufis are connected to Hekmatyar and ISI.

But A. The attacks in Uzbek have failed thus far and the blood has been the attackers. B. The attribution to Sufis is unproven C. The Sufi connection to HIA is unproven D. Even IF the attacker WERE Sufis connected to HIA, this would hardly show that new attacks in Afghanistan are likely.

Another piece of entertaining Asia Times speculation.
Posted by Liberalhawk 2004-04-01 11:06:12 AM||   2004-04-01 11:06:12 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Side note: Asia Times was the source that put Fallujah's population at 500K when I googled for it yesterday - more than double almost all other sources' estimates. A Paragon of truth, they are...
Posted by .com 2004-04-01 1:47:58 PM||   2004-04-01 1:47:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 2,000 Marines will welcome them with open arms.
Posted by Raptor  2004-04-01 4:39:18 PM||   2004-04-01 4:39:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Fred TROLL 2004-04-01 8:01:19 AM||   2004-04-01 8:01:19 AM|| Front Page Top

22:48 JJ TROLL
22:44 JJ
22:44 JJ
22:44 JJ
22:44 JJ
22:37 GJ TROLL
22:35 GJ
22:35 GJ
22:24 Fred TROLL
22:21 Patrick TROLL
22:17 Patrick
22:17 Patrick
22:15 John TROLL
22:13 John
22:13 John
22:11 Joe TROLL
22:09 Jackson TROLL
22:07 Jackson
22:07 Jackson
22:04 Fred TROLL
21:59 Fred
21:59 Fred
21:56 Jason TROLL
21:52 Jake TROLL









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com