Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 05/17/2004 View Sun 05/16/2004 View Sat 05/15/2004 View Fri 05/14/2004 View Thu 05/13/2004 View Wed 05/12/2004 View Tue 05/11/2004
1
2004-05-17 China-Japan-Koreas
US troops in S Korea ’off to Iraq’
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tipper 2004-05-17 12:50:17 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 about friggin' time. Off the tit, SK!
Posted by Frank G  2004-05-17 12:57:54 AM||   2004-05-17 12:57:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 like Frank said.
Posted by B 2004-05-17 7:20:55 AM||   2004-05-17 7:20:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Strategically makes sense but look for the Dems and media to jump up and down and use it to prove Iraq is a quagmire.
Posted by AWW 2004-05-17 8:02:24 AM||   2004-05-17 8:02:24 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 IIRC Jimma Carter wanted to drastically reduce the number of US troops in Korea. I wonder how he feels about this?;)
Posted by Spot  2004-05-17 9:41:21 AM||   2004-05-17 9:41:21 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 AWW: The spin's already started. This morning NPR local guy said the troops were being moved because of the "worsening" situation in Iraq.
Posted by growler 2004-05-17 9:56:43 AM||   2004-05-17 9:56:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Actually, I am concerned about how we work this out with SK. If we get their agreement, then no problem, but if they object, then the obvious tit for our tat is to withdraw their forces from Iraq (claiming they are needed to replace US forces to protect SK), which can hurt us.
Posted by Carl in N.H 2004-05-17 11:50:27 AM||   2004-05-17 11:50:27 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Nope! Don't need more troops in Iraq. Have just exactly the right number. Have provided all the combat commanders exactly what they say they need. Force size and structure just perfect. Don't need to expand the Army by two divisions. National Guard and Reserves can fill the slack. Won't have any impact on retention. Every day, in every way, things are getting better and better.

Sorry, I heard that stuff from McNamara in the 60s and 70s. Whatever his merits, Rumsfeld just doesn't have a clue when it comes to military operations tempo. The reality of Iraq/Afganistan/Horn of Africa don't map to his Pentagon restructing plan.
Posted by Highlander 2004-05-17 12:04:18 PM||   2004-05-17 12:04:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Ohh, how I do remember the South Koreans protesting us last year, in they're streets! They should be in the streets raving with joy...where are they?
Posted by smn  2004-05-17 12:43:34 PM||   2004-05-17 12:43:34 PM|| Front Page Top

10:29 Aussie Wife
03:37 Mark Espinola
07:53 Anonymous4937
07:06 Bravo Bravo
06:36 Brit: Tourist
06:33 ViroBono
06:11 Brit: Tourist
19:50 docob
19:35 Antiwar TROLL
08:06 B
01:46 Anonymous4617
01:26 Rafael
01:24 Mark Espinola
01:10 Super Hose
01:04 Anonymous4828
01:02 Super Hose
00:58 Super Hose
00:32 Mark Espinola
00:25 Mike Sylwester
00:15 Laurence of the Rats
00:09 Paul Moloney
00:01 Long Hair Republican
23:56 Atomic Conspiracy
23:54 ruprecht









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com