Article

2004-05-17 Europe

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Howard UK 2004-05-17 8:35:15 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 One of those battles pushed by the generals, that in hindsight, could have been avoided.

Posted by Chuck Simmins 2004-05-17 9:17:17 AM|| [http://blog.simmins.org] 2004-05-17 9:17:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 It was a monastery, right?

Who says we don't fire on holy places?

Posted by Anonymous2U 2004-05-17 11:55:30 AM|| 2004-05-17 11:55:30 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 IIRC, there was an agreement to avoid the religious building that was in the area (it was a prime highground spot, would have been highly contested and church woulda gone boom)
in any event the nazis lied and used it anyway

Posted by Dcreeper 2004-05-17 12:06:17 PM|| 2004-05-17 12:06:17 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 we do not fire on holy places unless fired upon..this is not a new policy...

Posted by Dan 2004-05-17 4:47:52 PM|| 2004-05-17 4:47:52 PM|| Front Page Top

10:29 Aussie Wife
03:37 Mark Espinola
07:53 Anonymous4937
07:06 Bravo Bravo
06:36 Brit: Tourist
06:33 ViroBono
06:11 Brit: Tourist
19:50 docob
19:35 Antiwar TROLL
08:06 B
01:46 Anonymous4617
01:26 Rafael
01:24 Mark Espinola
01:10 Super Hose
01:04 Anonymous4828
01:02 Super Hose
00:58 Super Hose
00:32 Mark Espinola
00:25 Mike Sylwester
00:15 Laurence of the Rats
00:09 Paul Moloney
00:01 Long Hair Republican
23:56 Atomic Conspiracy
23:54 ruprecht