Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 07/16/2004 View Thu 07/15/2004 View Wed 07/14/2004 View Tue 07/13/2004 View Mon 07/12/2004 View Sun 07/11/2004 View Sat 07/10/2004
1
2004-07-16 Home Front: Tech
Computerized fingerprint matching 99 percent accurate
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dar 2004-07-16 2:26:03 PM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 This technology continues and the terrorists will be really easy to locate: they will remove their fingers.
Posted by Capt America  2004-07-16 2:32:13 PM|| [http://captamerica.blogspot.com/]  2004-07-16 2:32:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Capt, Then arresting or shooting them would be 'profiling' aginst fingerless people.......
Posted by CrazyFool  2004-07-16 2:34:29 PM||   2004-07-16 2:34:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 99.6%? that's GREAT! why hell, that means only 1 in a 250 will be missed!
ugh.
and only a 1 in a thousand will be wrongly accused.. (maaan I aint touchin nuttin no more, this is as bad as dna)
Posted by Dcreeper 2004-07-16 7:11:27 PM||   2004-07-16 7:11:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Would you throw all forensic science in the bin then, Dc? "As bad as DNA"?! Come on, you're joking, right?
Posted by Bulldog  2004-07-16 7:15:16 PM||   2004-07-16 7:15:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 no, innocent people go to jail because of this stuff
do you think the lawyers stand up there and tell you "Well this system gives a false positive once for every thousand people checked, the finger prints of some 30,000 (whatever) people in the police database were checked against the ones found, that means 30 people have likly been wrongly identified and there is a 1 in 250 chance that the system actaully missed the culprit.. "

so much of forensic science is crap when you get a good look at it
don't get me started on the gun finding bullet shot stuff or the 'lie detector'
Posted by Dcreeper 2004-07-16 7:42:25 PM||   2004-07-16 7:42:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 meh mangled that
"don't get me started on gun finding from a shot bullet stuff"
makes more sense
Posted by Dcreeper 2004-07-16 7:43:49 PM||   2004-07-16 7:43:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 DC - that's nonsense. Nobody's been convicted on a fingerprint alone. Motive, method, no alibi, yadda yadda
Posted by Frank G  2004-07-16 8:15:17 PM||   2004-07-16 8:15:17 PM|| Front Page Top

16:51 Tom
16:25 Tom
15:43 Anonymous6534
10:11 Anonymous6360
07:04 Howard UK
06:53 Sock Puppet of Doom
06:14 Travis
21:11 cingold
20:33 rex
20:13 cingold
10:16 raptor
09:34 Frank G
09:32 raptor
00:44 Mark Espinola
00:41 CrazyFool
00:36 Zenster
00:09 trailing wife
23:56 rex
23:55 Mike Kozlowski
23:52 Bomb-a-rama
23:43 Mike Kozlowski
23:40 Barbara Skolaut
23:36 A Jackson
23:35 trailing wife









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com